Hostel Hudugaru Bekagiddare

This is called as simple fun , and it delivers you a value for money for fun especially for hostel boys.

1. They wanted create some good humor and they have created it ,

2 . Starting they created some intense , which made everyone confuse , but in the 2nd half it lost the intensity and there was no proper depth in the story , and it made me boring .

3. Cameo were not used properly I think , it was sudden and new experience , it was literally a ok experience

4. But everyone showed their dedication towards the movie , what holds you sit and watch the movie is their acting , and I am impressed by each and every newcomer acting .

5. It may be the worst movie for some , it may be fun for some , but if u want some fun like kirik party , u can add it to your list.

If I was Ramya, I too would have filed a case against the team!

The only good things about the cinema are the cinematography, editing and performances. Everything else is a minus, which includes, story, screenplay, music, sense, cameo by renowned actors and the list goes on.

The director should be applauded for his amazing marketing ability than the story-telling ability. He understands that today's youthiyaas are chutiyaas, who buy everything that is packaged well.

Good promos, self-trolling, superstars' engagement, liqour, weed are enough to bring a set of irresponsible people to theatres. Objectifying women (Ramya is made the brand ambassador for this), making weed and alcohol usage look cool among college going boys are frustrating to watch with families.

I am not even kidding when I say that at least 7,8 guys (not uncles.. guys) left during interval and didn't return.

Last week, the team's gimmick was "Mass bunk day" campaign. Slowly, students will start "make weed legal" campaign too.

It's sad that such horrible cinemas are being called the trend setters. If this is the trend that one wants to set, good luck with the new "Udta Karnataka!".

First of all, it is a youth movie made only for entertainment. It is creative in terms of narration, not in terms of story or in any other aspect.

It is made only for entertainment and delivers in that way.

It is not a 3-idiots or Kirik Party kind of story oriented movie.

There are many things going its way. Mainly, it is based on a bunch of characters and all of them are important in their own way, there is no single Protagonist. So, you just need to get involved in it.

Music is nice and complements the story. There is no main "love track" and movie doesn't get diverted in that way. Though all actors are new, they have delivered.

Promotion is a double edged sword. Though the movie got recognition because of so many celebrity actors, they are pulled in only for the sake of promotion. So, promotion has worked here.

On the other hand. We might feel these characters are just a waste and won't contribute to story apart from a bit of comical tough.

Anyhow, we can surely ignore drawbacks and enjoy the move for what it is. It surely tickles.funnybone unlike some senseless high octane masala movies.

It's not great as claimed You enjoy the movie there is no doubt about but it doesn't satisfy / conclude Could have been best for short movie or comedy web series.

--------------- Good ---------------- Story telling

One liner dailogues

Comedy

Music

Acting

Screenplay

------------- Bad ------------- Some what's feels dragged out to much

no plot

No end goal / message. (May end goal- director wanted prove its worst movie ever made as claimed on trailer / posters )

None of the guest appearance charcters make impact to story / movie it jus feels like they wanted to be part of it.

Above is only my view.

After an offbeat start, the first half of Hostel Hudugaru is absolutely hilarious. The character of Genie is genuinely one of the funniest characters I have seen, and the 'boys' dynamic is brilliant, with several gut busting lines that are delivered so well.

The interval twist is unexpected, but after the interval is where the film takes a dip in quality.

Whereas in the first half the meta comedy of the cameraman worked really well, in the second half they show the editor making comments which takes you out of the film's world. Furthermore, there are unnecessary shots of random woman dispersed throughout as that is what the 'editor' thinks will hook the audience. It detracts from the momentum after a very funny joke or a shocking moment.

However, the bad second half has a decent conclusion.

I rate this 5.5, rounded to 6, purely because the first half was absolutely brilliant.

(Furthermore, the camera style is great, and suits the film really well.)