Sarzameen

Sarzameen had all the ingredients for a gripping patriotic drama. But it's predictable, emotionally hollow, and ultimately exhausting to sit through. With a story that had the potential to strike a chord with viewers, the film could have been a compelling watch. Unfortunately, weak writing, uninspired direction, and sluggish pacing weigh it down from the very start.

The biggest culprit behind Sarzameen's failure is its below par performances and weak screenplay packed with unrealistic plot points. The direction is equally uninspired, lacking any real cinematic flair or purpose. The film tries to juggle emotion and action, aiming for nationalistic fervor while touching on personal sacrifice.

Prithviraj Sukumaran gives the film his all. He's a committed actor and tries hard to bring intensity to his role. However, even his sincere effort can't rise above the muddled writing. Ibrahim Ali Khan looks convincing in action sequences but struggles with his dialogue delivery and emotional scenes fall flat. Kajol feels entirely underused here. Other supporting actors gave below-average performances.

Direction 1.5/5 Acting 2/5 Dialogues 1.5/5 Story 1.5/5 Screenplay 1/5.

I recently watched Sarzameen with the hope that it would offer a powerful narrative about a complex geopolitical issue. Unfortunately, the film fell short on almost every front. It was disappointing, poorly structured, and left no lasting impression.

Plot: The storyline lacked depth and clarity. The plot revolved around sensitive themes like Kashmir, India, and Pakistan, but the treatment felt forced and oversimplified. There was no emotional buildup, no twists, and nothing that held the audience's attention. The movie felt like it was trying to say something important, but failed to deliver it meaningfully. Overall, the plot was confusing and bland.

Acting: The performances were underwhelming. Most of the actors appeared expressionless or overly dramatic in the wrong moments. It felt like they were trying too hard, yet failing to connect with the characters or the viewers. There was no standout performance that could save the film. Even intense scenes felt lifeless due to poor acting and lack of chemistry between the cast.

Direction & Visuals: The direction was sloppy. There was no consistent tone or pacing throughout the film. The visuals were plain and uninspired, and shockingly, the film had almost no background music, which made several scenes fall flat. Music is essential for building atmosphere, but here, the silence added awkwardness instead of tension.

Overall Impression: Sarzameen had potential, but it ended up being a paltu movie-confused, politically tinted, and emotionally disconnected. The lack of storytelling finesse, poor performances, and uninspired direction make it hard to recommend. I believe the makers could have done much better with such a relevant subject.

The much-hyped Sarzameen, a film that promised a gripping, high-stakes socio-political thriller, arrives with a resounding thud rather than a roar. Instead of a tense and immersive experience, viewers are left with a tedious, formulaic mess that struggles to justify its lengthy runtime. It's a cinematic misstep that fails on almost every conceivable level.

The primary issue lies in the convoluted and deeply unoriginal script. The narrative feels less like a finely tuned clock and more like a collection of discarded plot points awkwardly stitched together. The central mystery is so heavily telegraphed in the first act that any semblance of surprise is lost long before the climax. Subplots involving a generic family drama and a shoehorned romance not only fail to land but actively detract from the already weak main story. The pacing is glacial, with key moments stretched out to the point of exhaustion and crucial emotional beats completely glossed over, leaving the audience feeling detached and bored.

Compounding these script issues are the uninspired performances. The lead actor, often celebrated for their intensity, seems to be going through the motions here, delivering dialogue with a flat, monotonous tone. Their character lacks any real depth or motivation, making it impossible to root for them. The supporting cast fares no better, with many characters existing solely as exposition dumps or as archetypes who react in predictably clichéd ways. The palpable lack of chemistry between the leads makes their romantic arc feel entirely unearned and out of place, serving only to halt the plot's already stuttering momentum.

The direction is equally pedestrian. The camera work is static and uninspired, doing little to build tension or atmosphere. The film's washed-out color palette makes every scene feel drab and unengaging. The director appears content to rely on slow-motion shots and an overbearing background score to convey importance, rather than trusting the story or the actors to do so. In the end, Sarzameen is a monumental disappointment-a film that's neither thrilling nor emotionally resonant. Save your time and money; this "land" is not worth visiting.

Sarzameen (2025) ; Movie Review -

Kayoze Irani's Sarzameen is one of those films that sets up an ambitious emotional and patriotic premise, only to falter under the weight of its own overcomplications. While the trailer of the film may seem like it's given away the whole plot, rest assured - that's only a carefully laid-out misdirection. The real twist comes in the final quarter, flipping the story on its head. Sadly, that twist, as shocking as it is, arrives too late to rescue what is otherwise a dull, messy, and outdated narrative.

The story follows army officer Vijay Menon (Prithviraj Sukumaran), a man so loyal to his country that he chooses it over his own flesh and blood. He captures two deadly terrorists and soon receives a threat from the ISI, warning him that his son will be harmed if he doesn't cooperate. Faced with the ultimate dilemma, Vijay chooses duty. His son, Harman, is believed to be dead. Years pass, and out of nowhere, Harman (played by Ibrahim Ali Khan) returns. But Vijay has doubts. Is this really his son, or is it a ploy by the terrorists to breach his home and break his spirit?

It's a strong setup - one that could have offered rich emotional depth and edge-of-the-seat tension. But Sarzameen shoots itself in the foot with its convoluted writing and soap-opera style execution. The film tries so hard to be emotionally layered that it ends up feeling overly melodramatic and illogical at key moments. One of the biggest issues lies in the character choices and screenplay logic. Vijay, portrayed as a highly intelligent and decorated officer, brings Harman into his house without any real verification or caution. He later starts interrogating him over dinner, which is baffling considering the gravity of the threat. His lack of emotional intelligence and situational awareness reduces the credibility of his character and by extension, of the entire story. Harman's return and transformation into a possibly manipulated or brainwashed young man also lacks proper grounding. The portrayal of his emotional state - especially his grudge against his father for choosing the nation over him - feels immature and kiddish. A child might not understand such a sacrifice, but a grown man, aware of his father's duty, seeking revenge for it? That just doesn't land convincingly.

The emotional conflict could have worked if it was rooted in nuance and sensitivity. Instead, Sarzameen turns it into a loud, overdramatized shouting match. The film is stretched to 2 hours and 17 minutes with a pace so sluggish, it feels like a television soap stretched into a feature film. There are entire segments that could have been trimmed or rewritten to maintain focus. But the film seems too invested in surface-level emotions rather than letting its characters breathe or develop naturally.

Prithviraj Sukumaran, a powerhouse performer with acclaimed films like Classmates, Mumbai Police, Memories, and Ayyappanum Koshiyum, is largely wasted here. His performance feels forced, with visible loud expressions and dramatic pauses that the editing fails to cover up. There's little subtlety in how his character is handled - a sharp contrast to his past nuanced performances. Kajol, playing Mehar, does a decent job but is held back by repetitive lines and old-school emotional expressions. Her character lacks depth and falls into the trap of being the sobbing, helpless mother stuck between her husband and son. Ibrahim Ali Khan, in only his second film, delivers a better performance compared to his debut - which most would rather forget. He has a few solid emotional scenes and some action sequences that allow him to showcase potential. Jitendra Joshi, despite having minimal screen time, brings intensity and weight to his character. Mihir Ahuja is decent, Boman Irani is passable, and others like Abdul Quadir Amin and Rohed Khan are serviceable in their roles.

On the technical front, Sarzameen does offer some positives. The cinematography captures Kashmir's stunning landscapes with finesse, and a few close-up shots are particularly well-framed. The production design also reflects authenticity. However, these merits are quickly undermined by a lethargic frame rate and poor editing that makes the film feel slower than it already is. The tension never builds up to where it should be - a cardinal sin for a thriller. The music, composed in line with the film's serious tone, supports the story thematically but lacks any replay value. There are no memorable tracks, and the background score doesn't do enough to enhance key moments. Instead, it sometimes drags the narrative further, making already dull scenes feel longer. The lyrics in some songs are better written, but unfortunately, they get lost in the film's slow momentum.

The biggest disappointment, however, is in the film's overall treatment. The subject - about a soldier's conflict between nation and family, and a son returning from darkness - demanded an intense, sharp, and emotionally intelligent approach. A director like Neeraj Pandey (A Wednesday, Special 26, Baby) could have turned this into a nail-biting thriller. Kayoze Irani, on the other hand, seems more comfortable with theatrical melodrama than layered storytelling. The film ends up resembling a long-drawn serial rather than a taut cinematic experience. Yes, the final quarter of the film brings some excitement. The twist is unpredictable and adds a much-needed jolt. But by then, the damage is already done. The audience is too disconnected to care deeply about what happens. Overall, Sarzameen is a film with solid intentions and a genuinely promising storyline, but it loses direction with outdated storytelling and sluggish execution.

RATING - 4/10*

Review: Sarzameen 1.5/5

Sarzameen is a cinematic autopsy of what happens when a powerful premise is murdered by weak writing, hollow emotion, and a complete disconnect from truth. It doesn't move you, it doesn't disturb you-it just leaves you cold and disappointed.

A story that had the potential to explore identity, pain, and the deep scars of conflict instead becomes a confused mess of half-baked dialogue, implausible decisions, and characters who feel more like cardboard than flesh. Even Kajol, with her immense depth, is utterly wasted here. The emotional stakes are spoken of, but never felt. The performances float without weight, and the narrative-built on a critical revelation-falls apart under the simplest scrutiny.

When a supposed twist rests on a DNA test in a region soaked in surveillance and tension, you expect precision. Instead, we get melodrama over meaning. The script treats its audience as passive observers, never inviting them to engage, only to endure.

Cinema like this does more harm than good-because it pretends to speak truth, but it whispers fiction dressed as depth.

A missed opportunity. A wasted canvas. A story that deserved so much more.