Durch den katastrophalen Rückfall ihres Adoptivsohns wird Lexi, eine Kleinstadtanwältin, mit der Realität des Unternehmensbetrugs auf höchster Ebene konfrontiert.Durch den katastrophalen Rückfall ihres Adoptivsohns wird Lexi, eine Kleinstadtanwältin, mit der Realität des Unternehmensbetrugs auf höchster Ebene konfrontiert.Durch den katastrophalen Rückfall ihres Adoptivsohns wird Lexi, eine Kleinstadtanwältin, mit der Realität des Unternehmensbetrugs auf höchster Ebene konfrontiert.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 15 wins total
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I thought the acting was outstanding. If you have been vaccine injured or have a family member in that position there will be some part which resonates no matter whether it was the MMR as in this story, or another vax (or redefined vax). Family relationships and the effects vaccine injuries have on the family dynamic for those who are living the hell caused by fraudulent motives of Pharmaceutical companies to make money no matter the cost to physical health is especially moving. True to life because it's based on a whistleblowers evidence. I wish it had been able to show the outcomes on company employees who messed up.
Well done Mr. Wakefield and cast! 👍
Well done Mr. Wakefield and cast! 👍
It is not anti-science to assert that much of "science" done today by Big Pharma is corrupt.
Andy walks us through a story, showing how the corporate pressures to make profits are putting our children's health at risk.
He shows how many who are now "anti-vaxxers" were very much pro-vaccine until their child was injured *right after* a "wellness visit."
People can make ad-hominem attacks all they want. Such attacks are a known category of logical fallacy for a reason.
Watch with an open mind. Afterwards, read Euripides' substack to see how Big Pharma launched a massive attack to discredit Dr. Wakefield.
All in all, great work by Andy.
Andy walks us through a story, showing how the corporate pressures to make profits are putting our children's health at risk.
He shows how many who are now "anti-vaxxers" were very much pro-vaccine until their child was injured *right after* a "wellness visit."
People can make ad-hominem attacks all they want. Such attacks are a known category of logical fallacy for a reason.
Watch with an open mind. Afterwards, read Euripides' substack to see how Big Pharma launched a massive attack to discredit Dr. Wakefield.
All in all, great work by Andy.
Beautifully takes you though troubling issues with our health care system. An important movie for everyone to see to stay alert and ask questions about medicines, vaccines, and the health care system process In general. The story arc keeps you wanting to know more and makes you wonder what one would do in their situation against such a powerful behemoth as the medical community. The actors did a great job and made you feel what it must have been like for the real people who went through this must have been feeling. More films like this need to continue to educate the public as to what goes on behind closed doors, at our expense and the health of not just children, but everyone.
I had a view of the inside seat in 2002 when Wakefield was sacked for his findings. It looked very much like a hit job on him to avoid him ruining a multi-billion dollar income stream for pharmaceutical companies.
Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.
Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)
Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?
Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.
Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)
Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?
At last the truth is out. Big Pharma, the government, and corporate medicine can't cover up the dangers of modern vaccine production any longer. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Is a whistleblower ahead of his time. Beware if you are forced into getting a jab! Ask questions. Do your own research. The acting and script were easy to follow, even for a layman. Showing what goes on behind the scenes at drug companies is a public service. Doctors spouting medical tropes with no regard for the rights of individual patients was terrifying but true. Dramatizing the actual deposition testimony was brilliant. The audience was deeply engaged.
Wusstest du schon
- Zitate
Josh Koprowski: [from trailer] No one will ever believe them again.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Protocol-7?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Protocol-7
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 38 Minuten
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.00 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen