Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA group of 13 contestants compete in dangerous games on a private island for a cash prize in an intense season-long reality competition overseen by an enigmatic Banker.A group of 13 contestants compete in dangerous games on a private island for a cash prize in an intense season-long reality competition overseen by an enigmatic Banker.A group of 13 contestants compete in dangerous games on a private island for a cash prize in an intense season-long reality competition overseen by an enigmatic Banker.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
It is not bad. I will say that Rob is the factor keeping this show interesting.
As one reviewer said, the person facing the banker technically needs to eliminate high cases to be personally successful thus is ultimately working against the goal of driving up the grand total. This needs to be addressed.
A change that I think would make the show more interesting is this: If the person facing the banker loses they are eliminated. However, if the person facing the banker wins, they stay in the game, now have immunity, and the remaining contestants who aren't facing the banker have to do a Survivor type of vote to decide who goes home. The winner of that day's challenge would still have immunity thus would not be eligible to be voted off either.
This would drastically up the strategy and the alliance factors of the show which they are trying to make us feel like is important this season but they really are not.
Think about the game play back at camp before the evening's game with this change made. Just a suggestion.
As one reviewer said, the person facing the banker technically needs to eliminate high cases to be personally successful thus is ultimately working against the goal of driving up the grand total. This needs to be addressed.
A change that I think would make the show more interesting is this: If the person facing the banker loses they are eliminated. However, if the person facing the banker wins, they stay in the game, now have immunity, and the remaining contestants who aren't facing the banker have to do a Survivor type of vote to decide who goes home. The winner of that day's challenge would still have immunity thus would not be eligible to be voted off either.
This would drastically up the strategy and the alliance factors of the show which they are trying to make us feel like is important this season but they really are not.
Think about the game play back at camp before the evening's game with this change made. Just a suggestion.
The classic game of deal or no deal that we all know and love just got a little more entertaining!
With more high skates and bigger prizes it makes the game that more interesting! And the fact that the only way to stay in the game is to have a better deal is smart!
The whole "survivor" aspect is perfect where each week the contestants go through challenges to collect briefcases and do what they can to avoid the lowest one
This concept works really well and it seems like this is going to be a fun show and season with twist and turns..
Also I'm wondering if Howie is the banker it would only make sense especially if they're revealing who it is at the end of the season..
With more high skates and bigger prizes it makes the game that more interesting! And the fact that the only way to stay in the game is to have a better deal is smart!
The whole "survivor" aspect is perfect where each week the contestants go through challenges to collect briefcases and do what they can to avoid the lowest one
This concept works really well and it seems like this is going to be a fun show and season with twist and turns..
Also I'm wondering if Howie is the banker it would only make sense especially if they're revealing who it is at the end of the season..
Totally get it mix Deal or No Deal with Survivor which isn't a bad idea. But it makes no sense whatsoever.
I pushed through the first episode because it looked like it was going somewhere. But it didn't lol
The casting isn't bad - Boston Rob is naturally saving the series from some people who think this is their meal ticket to stardom.
Then in the last 5 minutes they turn the tables and get rid of someone completely invisible for the entire episode. Nah...
That poor guy didn't even get anything through the episode so you can't just blindside the audience like that and it made no sense because it negates the entire deal or no deal part... Play fair
Editing is shocking. Don't have all these contestants if you're focusing on the most weird and desperate for fame.
I pushed through the first episode because it looked like it was going somewhere. But it didn't lol
The casting isn't bad - Boston Rob is naturally saving the series from some people who think this is their meal ticket to stardom.
Then in the last 5 minutes they turn the tables and get rid of someone completely invisible for the entire episode. Nah...
That poor guy didn't even get anything through the episode so you can't just blindside the audience like that and it made no sense because it negates the entire deal or no deal part... Play fair
Editing is shocking. Don't have all these contestants if you're focusing on the most weird and desperate for fame.
I've never watched Deal or No Deal for more than a couple minutes because the concept just isn't that interesting to me (it's just statistics), especially if I'm not invested in the player. In this case, I was intrigued by the island competition aspect and enticed by Joe Manganiello and Boston Rob.
However, I ended up being pretty disappointed. Joe's charisma was dialed way down by the structure, and his lines seemed overly scripted. I enjoyed seeing Rob compete, but it wasn't enough to make up for many of the the other contestants, who schemed, back-stabbed and lied for no discernible reason, certainly not for gameplay. Without the excuse of starvation and exhaustion, I felt embarrassed for these people displaying such unearned personal vitriol for other players, and it ended up leaving a bad taste in my mouth.
It was interesting seeing the compassionate side of Rob unable to hold back the bloodthirst of first-time players, the personal offers spiced things up sometimes, and I didn't so much mind the final player, but I doubt I'll be watching future seasons.
However, I ended up being pretty disappointed. Joe's charisma was dialed way down by the structure, and his lines seemed overly scripted. I enjoyed seeing Rob compete, but it wasn't enough to make up for many of the the other contestants, who schemed, back-stabbed and lied for no discernible reason, certainly not for gameplay. Without the excuse of starvation and exhaustion, I felt embarrassed for these people displaying such unearned personal vitriol for other players, and it ended up leaving a bad taste in my mouth.
It was interesting seeing the compassionate side of Rob unable to hold back the bloodthirst of first-time players, the personal offers spiced things up sometimes, and I didn't so much mind the final player, but I doubt I'll be watching future seasons.
This program is so unbelievably bad, the only thing that has kept me watching it is Boston Rob. They better make him a co-host if, miraculously, it gets picked up for a second season. Some people haven't like the Survivor aspects of it but to me, that's the only interesting part and even they are pretty tame and lame. The actual game of Deal or No Deal is not too bad, it's the 45 minutes of blather inbetween that make me feel like I'm wasting my life. And it's another American program of scheming, unpleasant, dishonest, backstabbing people will ill intent that I'm sure no one needs. If I wanted to watch that, I'd watch the news.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesSeason 1 & 2 have had a contestant from Survivor.
- VerbindungenReferenced in The Traitors: Reunion (2025)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen