Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuShark Exorcist's flesh-eating demon shark returns, threatening everyone, especially the determined priest vowing to stop Hell's ultimate evil.Shark Exorcist's flesh-eating demon shark returns, threatening everyone, especially the determined priest vowing to stop Hell's ultimate evil.Shark Exorcist's flesh-eating demon shark returns, threatening everyone, especially the determined priest vowing to stop Hell's ultimate evil.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Jessa Jupiter Flux
- Kacey
- (as Jessa Flux)
Claude D. Miles
- Claude
- (as Ford Windstar)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Living in a small town, a series of strange deaths in the area are soon attributed to a curse enacted by a nun summoning a demon shark to prey on the town members after the treatment of her child years ago and force a disgraced priest into a battle of good and evil to stop it.
This was a generally fun and likable follow-up. One of the stronger elements here is the rather enjoyable setup that brings about an opportunity to revel in quite a bit of solid cheese. The overall setup of the shark's resurrection and presence in the community by going for the route of the beast as a physical manifestation of a nun's vengeance over her child's death and enacting a pact with Satan to ensure the demonic shark is the instrument of her revenge gives the film a great baseline to work with. Given the means through which the nun goes about taking victims to the shark as a sacrificial offering or tracking down survivors to ensure the attack is followed through on, as everything ties back to the curse as her actions spur the priest into action to stop her. It's all pretty well-connected with the other girls who become connected to everything over time, which gives this a solid start alongside the sense of cheesy and outright silly action featured in this one. The idea of the shark seen swimming around the lake getting ready to attack either the swimming mother, the series of sacrificial victims given to the shark, or the final attack on the beach which are extremely silly and provides a perfectly acceptable feel to the storyline provided here. Also, rather fun with everything here is the improved technical aspects from what happened to the original, as it's enhanced quite significantly, all keeping this one going along rather nicely. There are some drawbacks to this one that hold it down. The main drawback to this one is the same issue that plagued the original in an overlong sense of padding that arises from the scenes here not involving the shark. Having a majority of the scenes here go on far longer than they should, whether it's the endless scenes of characters wandering around a location with little purpose, talking about movies with friends, or the exploits of the dancer forcing a client to take a road trip to the beach, are all generally enjoyable scenes taken individually but manage to highlight how the pace is off with these taking up the time it could've spent on shark attacks. As well, there's also the expected low-budget antics featured here, which are expected but manage to also hold this one down.
Rated Unrated/R: Violence and Graphic Language.
This was a generally fun and likable follow-up. One of the stronger elements here is the rather enjoyable setup that brings about an opportunity to revel in quite a bit of solid cheese. The overall setup of the shark's resurrection and presence in the community by going for the route of the beast as a physical manifestation of a nun's vengeance over her child's death and enacting a pact with Satan to ensure the demonic shark is the instrument of her revenge gives the film a great baseline to work with. Given the means through which the nun goes about taking victims to the shark as a sacrificial offering or tracking down survivors to ensure the attack is followed through on, as everything ties back to the curse as her actions spur the priest into action to stop her. It's all pretty well-connected with the other girls who become connected to everything over time, which gives this a solid start alongside the sense of cheesy and outright silly action featured in this one. The idea of the shark seen swimming around the lake getting ready to attack either the swimming mother, the series of sacrificial victims given to the shark, or the final attack on the beach which are extremely silly and provides a perfectly acceptable feel to the storyline provided here. Also, rather fun with everything here is the improved technical aspects from what happened to the original, as it's enhanced quite significantly, all keeping this one going along rather nicely. There are some drawbacks to this one that hold it down. The main drawback to this one is the same issue that plagued the original in an overlong sense of padding that arises from the scenes here not involving the shark. Having a majority of the scenes here go on far longer than they should, whether it's the endless scenes of characters wandering around a location with little purpose, talking about movies with friends, or the exploits of the dancer forcing a client to take a road trip to the beach, are all generally enjoyable scenes taken individually but manage to highlight how the pace is off with these taking up the time it could've spent on shark attacks. As well, there's also the expected low-budget antics featured here, which are expected but manage to also hold this one down.
Rated Unrated/R: Violence and Graphic Language.
If you've seen some of the director's more recent works then you'll recognize several of the people here. I think one of the best things about this film is the editing from Tim Ritter who keeps everything moving at a nice pace. The film obviously isn't taking the subject matter too serious and that's a good thing. The CGI shark looks a lot better than what was used in the previous film and I'd also argue that this CGI shark looks better than a lot of the recent CGI shark films.
This doesn't contain the sleaze and nudity like a lot of the director's other films from the past few years but the CGI kills are mostly entertaining and make up for it. There are also some bloody scenes thrown in. There could always have been more shark kills but that could be said for any shark movie.
This doesn't contain the sleaze and nudity like a lot of the director's other films from the past few years but the CGI kills are mostly entertaining and make up for it. There are also some bloody scenes thrown in. There could always have been more shark kills but that could be said for any shark movie.
Shark Exorcist 2 is much less sleazy than the original Shark Exorcist, but is also somehow much more incompetently made. At times it felt like a Dustin Ferguson movie, because there so much obvious filler. This is really weird coming from Donald Farmer, who while not a master filmmaker, has nearly 40 years of experience. His movies aren't always "good" but they're at least competently made. Also, the CGI shark is somehow worse than the first movie. I'm going to give this movie a 3/10, mostly due to Jessa Flux chewing up the scenery in every scene she's in. Jessa has really become an indie horror juggernaut over the last few years. If you're a fan of hers, this is a much watch. If not, mostly just watch if you're into bad shark movies, which I am.
It's difficult to fairly review low budget movies and ignore the obvious technical limitations that the filmmakers are working with, but I try to do my best. That being said, I have seen indie films made on shoestring budgets shot well, edited professionally, with decent stories. This movie's technical missteps cannot be overlooked. The camera shakes and rattles when the wind gusts. There's a scene where the camera is obviously set on a table, and when the main character in the scene moves, the camera shakes like a webcam on a laptop. The sound design issues are myriad - with the volume and sound quality wildly varying between shots in the same scene... and the editing is terrible! The last scene of the movie, the conversation between Jessa Flux and the Autumn's friend character (whose name I cannot find in the credits) obviously took place in two very different locales, on different days, using different equipment. There were four directors of photography, and four FULL pages of producers, executive and otherwise. Is there an excuse for this? I can't think of one.
This is a profoundly bad movie, and I can't believe it turned out worse than the first.
This is a profoundly bad movie, and I can't believe it turned out worse than the first.
While I most certainly loathed the 2014 movie "Shark Exorcist", I still opted to watch the sequel, as I had the opportunity to do so here in 2025. Sure, I wasn't harboring the slightest of expectations to the movie. But on the way, way, way off chance that "Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" might actually be worthwhile watching, I opted to give the movie a fair chance.
The storyline in the movie was nothing to write home about. It was a rather simplistic script and storyline, so don't get your hopes up.
Of course I was not familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie. And while that is usually something I enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie, I have to say that the acting performances in "Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" just were subpar and proved anything but enjoyable.
The CGI rendered shark looked absolutely atrocious. It is rather amazing that something as laughable as this sees the light of day in 2024. And I absolutely love the fact that the shark in the movie is able to roar like some creature from a 1980s cartoon. Seriously, what were writers Donald Farmer and Jessa Jupiter Flux thinking here?
I am perplexed why Wild Eye Releasing actually spawned these movies.
"Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" is as bad as the 2014 movie was, so I would not recommend you to waste 74 minutes on this garbage.
The storyline in the movie was nothing to write home about. It was a rather simplistic script and storyline, so don't get your hopes up.
Of course I was not familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie. And while that is usually something I enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie, I have to say that the acting performances in "Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" just were subpar and proved anything but enjoyable.
The CGI rendered shark looked absolutely atrocious. It is rather amazing that something as laughable as this sees the light of day in 2024. And I absolutely love the fact that the shark in the movie is able to roar like some creature from a 1980s cartoon. Seriously, what were writers Donald Farmer and Jessa Jupiter Flux thinking here?
I am perplexed why Wild Eye Releasing actually spawned these movies.
"Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters" is as bad as the 2014 movie was, so I would not recommend you to waste 74 minutes on this garbage.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesRoni Jonah and Christy Moritz are the only actresses from the original film who reprise their roles for this sequel.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Shark Exorcist 2
- Drehorte
- Hendersonville, Tennessee, USA(Filmed at the Hendersonville Lake)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 100.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 14 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Shark Exorcist 2: Unholy Waters (2024) officially released in India in English?
Antwort