Bookish
- Fernsehserie
- 2025–
Gabriel Book, Inhaber eines Antiquariats, stützt sich auf seine umfangreiche Sammlung, um rätselhafte Fälle zu lösen. Er kümmert sich um eine Gruppe liebenswerter, aber problembehafteter Men... Alles lesenGabriel Book, Inhaber eines Antiquariats, stützt sich auf seine umfangreiche Sammlung, um rätselhafte Fälle zu lösen. Er kümmert sich um eine Gruppe liebenswerter, aber problembehafteter MenschenGabriel Book, Inhaber eines Antiquariats, stützt sich auf seine umfangreiche Sammlung, um rätselhafte Fälle zu lösen. Er kümmert sich um eine Gruppe liebenswerter, aber problembehafteter Menschen
- Stoffentwicklung
- Hauptbesetzung
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I wanted to watch that series because of Gatiss as a Sherlock and Doctor Who fan.
But after 2 first episodes I'm bored and disappointed. Sucha a pity. Nice idea of a bookworm solving crimes in post war London.
Firstly the main character is a boring show off. His is constantly acting like "Look at me, I'm a genius". He likes to be in the center of the attention, not carrying about the others.
His wife is acting like some kind of overacting actress from the theatre. There's completely no chemistry between them. Like they just friends, pretending that they are in love, cos he's gay?
And what with that lisping girl from the neighbourhood, acting like 15 years old?!
She's grown up and acting like a schoolgirl.
Jack is completely bland and the series would be OK without him, he adds nothing in the script.
Ok, now the mistery. We have a few red herrings and of course a murderer is a person, which is showed earlier. People with strong motives are innocent like always. Murderer is punished.
But why they wasted 2 whole episodes to solve such an easy mistery?! Why not 1 episode with less dialogues?!
Little less conversation, a little more action! Like Elvis once said.
Believe me, they're better series that that one.
Now you can hate me, I don't care. That's my opinion, and I will keep it.
But after 2 first episodes I'm bored and disappointed. Sucha a pity. Nice idea of a bookworm solving crimes in post war London.
Firstly the main character is a boring show off. His is constantly acting like "Look at me, I'm a genius". He likes to be in the center of the attention, not carrying about the others.
His wife is acting like some kind of overacting actress from the theatre. There's completely no chemistry between them. Like they just friends, pretending that they are in love, cos he's gay?
And what with that lisping girl from the neighbourhood, acting like 15 years old?!
She's grown up and acting like a schoolgirl.
Jack is completely bland and the series would be OK without him, he adds nothing in the script.
Ok, now the mistery. We have a few red herrings and of course a murderer is a person, which is showed earlier. People with strong motives are innocent like always. Murderer is punished.
But why they wasted 2 whole episodes to solve such an easy mistery?! Why not 1 episode with less dialogues?!
Little less conversation, a little more action! Like Elvis once said.
Believe me, they're better series that that one.
Now you can hate me, I don't care. That's my opinion, and I will keep it.
It's rare for a show with such a brilliant theme and concept to fall apart so quickly, but Bookish manages it with surprising speed. What starts as a gentle, character-driven world in the first episode devolves into a frustrating and aimless experience by the second.
Unfortunately, this promising premise was let down by poor execution. The second episode squanders all narrative momentum, turning the possibly deliberate pace of the premiere into a frustrating meander.
The central mystery, which should be the show's driving force, struggles to move forward, or may I say just entangles itself repeatedly... making the plot feel aimless and repetitive.
Instead of building tension, the story feels too clever for its own good, introducing a series of convoluted scenes that go on with no clear end in sight. The show relies heavily on its quirky characters, but without a compelling narrative, their unique traits become a tedious way to fill time.
Ultimately, Bookish fails to deliver, leaving me with a sense of disappointment and a feeling that the series is a book best left unfinished.
Unfortunately, this promising premise was let down by poor execution. The second episode squanders all narrative momentum, turning the possibly deliberate pace of the premiere into a frustrating meander.
The central mystery, which should be the show's driving force, struggles to move forward, or may I say just entangles itself repeatedly... making the plot feel aimless and repetitive.
Instead of building tension, the story feels too clever for its own good, introducing a series of convoluted scenes that go on with no clear end in sight. The show relies heavily on its quirky characters, but without a compelling narrative, their unique traits become a tedious way to fill time.
Ultimately, Bookish fails to deliver, leaving me with a sense of disappointment and a feeling that the series is a book best left unfinished.
I'm not a fan of everything that Mark Gatiss has been in, like "Moonflower Murders" or the "Sherlock Holmes" series, but I did enjoy "Bookish". I've always been a fan of Polly Walker from "Enchanted April" to "Bridgerton", she's great in any role. And Connor Finch is a nice addition.
It's a very English detective series, something to relish like an Agatha Christie mystery. You just need a cup of tea and some biscuits and a comfortable chair. Trottie and Gabriel's lavender marriage wasn't that unique, it had a name. The episodes are different, not recycled plots that have been done before.
It's already been renewed for a 2nd season. I hope season 2 has 8 episodes instead of 6. It's a different take on the amateur detective genre and worth a second season.
It's a very English detective series, something to relish like an Agatha Christie mystery. You just need a cup of tea and some biscuits and a comfortable chair. Trottie and Gabriel's lavender marriage wasn't that unique, it had a name. The episodes are different, not recycled plots that have been done before.
It's already been renewed for a 2nd season. I hope season 2 has 8 episodes instead of 6. It's a different take on the amateur detective genre and worth a second season.
This looks great and has very fine writing and performances. There's a limit to how many plot variations an amateur detective can have and Bookish doesn't really try to push the envelope.
But that is part of its charm.. familiarity with the characters and plots makes it all more enjoyable.
The one negative and itis a big one is that the sound quality s not good enough to make the dialogue clear in all circumstances. Could badly do with optional subtitles.
But that is part of its charm.. familiarity with the characters and plots makes it all more enjoyable.
The one negative and itis a big one is that the sound quality s not good enough to make the dialogue clear in all circumstances. Could badly do with optional subtitles.
I must admit that I had been looking forward to this debuting from the moment I found out of its existence.
I was not disappointed.
I love the characters. Book and Trottie are a wonderful couple, tender and loving. But at the risk of divulging spoilers, I shall say no more on that.
At the time of writing I have only 'binged' four of the six episodes (why are there not more?!). The supporting cast are equally compelling, hinting at depths not yet explored.
The cinematography, direction, set and costume design are all superb.
The storylines are well thought out, with allusions of other famous whodunnits, but with spins on them that only bring them to light during the denouement.
Gatiss is a superb writer, like all of his works he knows his subject matter and he sprinkles Easter eggs and nods throughout whilst creating something truly original.
I am sad that only six episodes have been made. So far. The series, the characters, the mysteries, deserve many, many more outings. If there is any justice, we will see Book and co. Again.
10/10.
I was not disappointed.
I love the characters. Book and Trottie are a wonderful couple, tender and loving. But at the risk of divulging spoilers, I shall say no more on that.
At the time of writing I have only 'binged' four of the six episodes (why are there not more?!). The supporting cast are equally compelling, hinting at depths not yet explored.
The cinematography, direction, set and costume design are all superb.
The storylines are well thought out, with allusions of other famous whodunnits, but with spins on them that only bring them to light during the denouement.
Gatiss is a superb writer, like all of his works he knows his subject matter and he sprinkles Easter eggs and nods throughout whilst creating something truly original.
I am sad that only six episodes have been made. So far. The series, the characters, the mysteries, deserve many, many more outings. If there is any justice, we will see Book and co. Again.
10/10.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAlthough set in London, it's mostly filmed in Belgium.
- PatzerThe London taxis are FX3, which were not produced until 1948 - 2 years on from the setting of the series.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen