Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
Episodenguide
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
IMDbPro

Optics

  • Fernsehserie
  • 2025–
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,8/10
243
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Peter Phelps, Vic Zerbst, and Jenna Owen in Optics (2025)
Komödie

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuTwo young women, unexpectedly promoted, face crises at their PR firm. Managing celebrities and corporate scandals, they uncover a potential firm scandal and suspect sabotage.Two young women, unexpectedly promoted, face crises at their PR firm. Managing celebrities and corporate scandals, they uncover a potential firm scandal and suspect sabotage.Two young women, unexpectedly promoted, face crises at their PR firm. Managing celebrities and corporate scandals, they uncover a potential firm scandal and suspect sabotage.

  • Stoffentwicklung
    • Charles Firth
    • Jenna Owen
    • Vic Zerbst
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Jenna Owen
    • Vic Zerbst
    • Charles Firth
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,8/10
    243
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Stoffentwicklung
      • Charles Firth
      • Jenna Owen
      • Vic Zerbst
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Jenna Owen
      • Vic Zerbst
      • Charles Firth
    • 14Benutzerrezensionen
    • 1Kritische Rezension
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 1 Nominierung insgesamt

    Episoden6

    Folgen durchsuchen
    HöchsteAm besten bewertet1 Jahreszeit2025

    Fotos1

    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung73

    Ändern
    Jenna Owen
    Jenna Owen
    • Nicole Kidman
    • 2025
    Vic Zerbst
    Vic Zerbst
    • Greta Goldman
    • 2025
    Charles Firth
    Charles Firth
    • Ian Randell
    • 2025
    Bali Padda
    Bali Padda
    • Cody Smith
    • 2025
    Belinda Giblin
    • Meredith Laughton
    • 2025
    Claude Jabbour
    Claude Jabbour
    • Bobby Bahl
    • 2025
    Aaron Collins
    • Dod
    • 2025
    Virginie Laverdure
    Virginie Laverdure
    • Anna McDowell
    • 2025
    Will McNeill
    Will McNeill
    • Bundy Gribbons
    • 2025
    Stephen Hunter
    Stephen Hunter
    • Greg Hogg
    • 2025
    Arielle Carver-O'Neill
    Arielle Carver-O'Neill
    • Doctor Chailey
    • 2025
    Kate Walsh
    Kate Walsh
    • Hannah Halston
    • 2025
    Josh Helman
    Josh Helman
    • Archie Toole
    • 2025
    Rhys Muldoon
    Rhys Muldoon
    • Matthew Chamberlain
    • 2025
    Alex Lee
    • Lisa Dove
    • 2025
    Mandy McElhinney
    Mandy McElhinney
    • Olivia
    • 2025
    Peter Carroll
    Peter Carroll
    • Frank Fritz
    • 2025
    Matthew Whittet
    Matthew Whittet
    • Spence Tasker
    • 2025
    • Stoffentwicklung
      • Charles Firth
      • Jenna Owen
      • Vic Zerbst
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen14

    5,8243
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    8kimmgould

    Clashing worlds finding each other

    Expect some reviewers to be as blind to the world of Nicole and Greta as Ian is. Ian doesn't realise the world has moved on. But - and this makes this series loveable -it doesn't rely on boring tropes. Nicole and Greta soon learn that they need to call on Ian's experience when they find themselves out of their depth. Over time they form a grudging respect for each other.

    Nicole and Greta are perfect, their dialogue, their fashion, their relationship. So good. Their faces when Meredith has forgotten her wallet and phone and they ask how she got coffee on the way to work 🤣

    Love the references to the captains lounge, prayer rooms, and other Aussie political hot potatoes.

    There's also a gradual realisation of the difference between the two generations. One is so tolerant of corruption that it's just business and usual. The other is constantly blindsided by it, and has to find a way to navigate the moral dilemmas. Can't wait for the second series.
    3waynewoff

    Yeah ..... nah

    Couldn't make it through the first episode .... Broad set up was fine 👍 PR firm - different staff, clients, situations, generations 👍 So off we go but immediately we run into big trouble! A script that is desperately over written and way too dense & wordy. So called "Funny" bits that are made, then made again & then let's hammer that point one more time. Just too obvious, lacked any subtlety or nuance and most depressingly for a comedy - not funny. Felt like it was made in the 1990s on a limited budget (they just added in social media to make it contemporary & razor sharp - not!!) Had read good reviews so that I'd try - but absolutely a resounding "no thanks" from this viewer!
    5scopesclare

    Disappointing, again

    I thought that I was going to enjoy this. Actually, I was quite sceptical about enjoying it. Rarely does Australian comedy hit the mark for me. Usually it's a problem with the scripting, not enough money going into development, and this shows. I think there is a lot of telling rather than showing, and some basic problems which could easily be fixed with a good edit. For example, a small point, in the first episode, we know the sports person is called Bundy, but just about every time someone talks to him, his name is used in the line, he knows his name is Bundy, we know his name is Bundy there's no need to keep repeating it. If you were having a conversation with someone, say John, you wouldn't say, 'John how are you, John?' No, you would just say, 'How are you?' This kind of basic stuff brings the quality down. Having said that, some of the observations and lines are very witty and sharp, but the lead actors are unfortunately not experienced enough to pull it off. The comedic timing is off, something that could be adjusted with better editing, and I found it annoying having the two main characters in the same shot side by side all the time, echoing each other's thoughts, it would work better if the two characters were condensed into one. They seem to have the exact same job, do they? It is a double act, but for me, it doesn't work. And why would they promote two women if they are reluctant to even promote one?

    I'm sorry to say but Optics does not compare to top of the range comedies, unfortunately the Australian industry is too small for those inside it to be honest about the quality of some of the shows. So, a cycle of average gets churned out and everyone slaps each others' backs, at the expense of honest criticism. I don't think it's a lack of talent, it's a lack of money, and the way the industry is funded, grants awarded by bureaucrats to those who have already received grants. That combined with the fact that many of our talented people leave the shores for America.

    There was some enjoyable bits in it, and the writers are clearly extremely observant and intelligent, but this does not necessarily translate into good comedy.

    It's a big shame that this wasn't better, the premise is very promising.
    2akaslammin

    Incompetent

    The writing and acting of Optics is as incompetent as the character Ian in the show.

    It is a good concept. And the PR industry provides plenty of opportunities for comedy; clearly the farcical issues, people and business the PR industry deal with is ripe for a satirical comedy show. And the difference between traditional PR approaches compared to PR in the new social media world provides plenty of comedic tension that could be exploited.

    But unfortunately it is very badly executed and a missed opportunity. The comedy and jokes are clumsy and mostly the set-ups are stupid and boring. The actors playing the main characters have no comic timing or rapport and are just bad.

    It is a pity this wasn't done by working dog team who would have taken the opportunity this provides and created something g actually funny.
    7phaserphil80

    Couldn't enjoy it

    I seen the trailer for this and seen all the cameos and went "Oh yeah sweet" but got into the episodes when it released, maybe I don't understand the humour but I didn't really enjoy this and got through all the episodes and laughed about twice. But maybe I'll watch it again and give it another go later.

    But the cameos made it better, seeing Kate Walsh, like Grey's Anatomy Kate Walsh just pop up in an episode was really cool though and it was good to see her first role in an Australian comedy.

    Jenna and Vic have a great career ahead of them for sure to make a whole TV series, I won't knock them for trying because we know how hard it is for a show to come together and work.

    It's fine but for me I think it requires more then one viewing.

    Mehr wie diese

    Good Cop/Bad Cop
    6,8
    Good Cop/Bad Cop
    Bergerac
    6,5
    Bergerac
    Bay of Fires
    6,6
    Bay of Fires
    Nugget Is Dead?: A Christmas Story
    5,1
    Nugget Is Dead?: A Christmas Story
    The Last Anniversary
    7,1
    The Last Anniversary
    The Dog
    The Dog
    Small Town, Big Story
    6,1
    Small Town, Big Story
    Little Disasters
    7,1
    Little Disasters
    Brian and Maggie
    6,8
    Brian and Maggie
    Jane Austen: Rise of a Genius
    7,9
    Jane Austen: Rise of a Genius
    Sometime Other Than Now
    6,0
    Sometime Other Than Now
    Madam
    6,3
    Madam

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 29. Januar 2025 (Australien)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Australien
    • Offizieller Standort
      • Press
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Easy Tiger Productions
      • ITV Studios
      • Screen Australia
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Farbe
      • Color

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    Peter Phelps, Vic Zerbst, and Jenna Owen in Optics (2025)
    Oberste Lücke
    What is the French language plot outline for Optics (2025)?
    Antwort
    • Weitere Lücken anzeigen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeitenFolge hinzufügen

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.