Duobeje

The acting is truly exceptional, especially the main character's emotional struggle between hope and despair, which allows the viewer to live through each moment with him. Every scene feels authentic, from the carefully portrayed challenges of nature to the human ingenuity and will to survive.

The cinematography is simply stunning. The beauty of the wilderness perfectly contrasts with its brutality, and the camera work is so immersive that it's hard to look away. The director skillfully creates an atmosphere where even moments of silence are just as important as the action scenes, further intensifying the sense of isolation and danger.

Duobeje is an ambitious movie that succeeds in creating an atmospheric experience but struggles to deliver a fully satisfying narrative. The cinematography is undeniably stunning-each frame feels meticulously crafted, with moody lighting and symbolic imagery that pull you into its melancholic world.

The performances are solid, particularly from the lead actors, who bring subtle emotion to roles that often feel underwritten. The film explores themes of isolation and identity, but its pacing can be slow, and at times it leans too heavily on ambiguity without offering enough payoff.

While Duobeje is admirable for its artistic intent and aesthetic, it left me wanting more in terms of character development and emotional connection. It's the kind of film that may resonate deeply with some viewers, but for others, it might feel more like a beautiful puzzle missing a few crucial pieces.

Not much to say here, but movie which was supposed to bring intensity, fear and everything associated with survival movies made me laugh throughout entire film.

Random story line, casuall rascism, r*pe ( which was super not needed (as 80% of characters in the film).

Logical issues, terrible acting from most of the actors except the main actor Ainis Storpirstis.

Movie had no idea, it lacked some sort of action about the main character ( who btw was doing everything except trying to survive).

Movie was so bad that most people in the cinema started laughing, cringing and talking because the director of this move had no idea how to captivate audience.

Terrible move 1/10.

In fact, it was very surprising. Not only the plot, but also the acting of the actors, the plot twists, the thought itself. Finally, you can see something else in the lithuanian work. I think it wasn't appreciated by The Lithuanian audience, and here these pieces of Malinauskas Fools' Guard, I watched all this nonsense, when the rating of the film fell to 1.3 per day. Absurdity. Lithuanians, as always, turn out to be all the more beautiful, not that they are driving it, because they are jealous.

Going back to the film, Kanyushoni is a wonderful actor and I think he's revealed himself the most as an actor and all his roles.

Ainis perfectly fulfilled everything emotionally. I wonder if there will be a second part, because the ending surprised. Orginal. Congratulations to the developers.

There's not much to say here, but a film that was meant to evoke intensity, fear, and the essence of survival ended up being unintentionally funny from start to finish.

The plot felt random, with unnecessary elements like casual racism and an out-of-place assault scene (which, like 80% of the characters, served no purpose).

The film was filled with logical inconsistencies, and most of the acting was subpar, with the exception of the lead actor, Ainis Storpirstis, who stood out.

The movie lacked direction, failing to focus on the main character's survival journey (ironically, he did everything except try to survive).

It was so poorly executed that people in the theater began laughing, cringing, and talking, as it became clear that the director had no grasp on how to engage the audience.