IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,1/10
1689
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Dinesh D'Souza untersucht die Herausforderungen, mit denen Donald Trump bei seiner Rückkehr ins Präsidentenamt konfrontiert ist, darunter politische Opposition, Rechtsstreitigkeiten und Atte... Alles lesenDinesh D'Souza untersucht die Herausforderungen, mit denen Donald Trump bei seiner Rückkehr ins Präsidentenamt konfrontiert ist, darunter politische Opposition, Rechtsstreitigkeiten und Attentatsversuche.Dinesh D'Souza untersucht die Herausforderungen, mit denen Donald Trump bei seiner Rückkehr ins Präsidentenamt konfrontiert ist, darunter politische Opposition, Rechtsstreitigkeiten und Attentatsversuche.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Fotos
Joe Biden
- Self - U.S. President
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Wolf Blitzer
- Self - T.V. Reporter
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Tucker Carlson
- Self - Political Broadcaster
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Hillary Clinton
- Self - Democrat Politician
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
James Comey
- Self - Former FBI Director
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Dianne Feinstein
- Self - Democrat Senator
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Kamala Harris
- Self - U.S. Vice President
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
- Self - U.S. Political Candidate
- (Archivfilmmaterial)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
As a former "Never Trumper" who is going to vote for Trump in 2024, I highly recommend seeing this movie. The most shocking part of it was the part about what is legal and possible in terms of fake ballots. Really shocking James O'Keefe-like footage showing what is possible in terms of cheating. This is so alarming. Without proper elections there is no hope for the world. Venezuela here we come. I am so sorry I misjudged Trump in the past. And I honestly do think that the West will fall unless we elect Trump and other republicans, aided by Democrats including Bobby, Tulsi, the Weinsteins and so many other good people who reject the insane leftist agenda of changing the rules of the game to create a one-party state (weaponising the Justice system, rigging the vote, riding roughshod over our constitutional rights like free speech and the second amendment), etc. I want a president who respects the constitution, rather than a tyrannical Maoist bent on destroying America. This film by Dinesh was excellent.
This is a movie well worth seeing with the Election drawing near. Dinesh D'Souza has made a movie, which tops the previous three. The use of actors to help tell the story of the Establishment's crackdown on the American people improves pacing. Casting Nick Searcy as a Democrat operative is a stroke of brilliance. The movie's dark humor is a welcome surprise. Some things could have been done better. John Wayne makes for a better Western hero than Clint Eastwood. There could have been some discussion about how deep state will be dealt with if Trump regains White House. Still an amazing film. Stay past the beginning of the closing credits.
Tough to watch at times, due to the reality of the corruption and devisiveness we're seeing in our country. This documentary by Dinesh was well produced and included behind the scenes footage and information to give the viewer a clearer picture of what is happening with our elections and politics. Much actual footage was used to illustrate the corruption and frankly it was shocking to learn that anyone can order ballots to be printed and submitted. The only one who would think this was acceptable would be someone who wants to control the election outcome, vs respect the voice of the people. It needs to be corrected. Corruption at so many levels...
This review is actually to point out the after election spin of a review written on oct the 6th. Just about one month before we knew which was the wind really blew.
Now the best part is carefully reading the dated narratives and assertions about authority and quality of the individuals judgment or negative things like lying.
Of course its rated a not at all unreasonable 1 out of 10.
Heck if you want an idea of how much total bs is in the ratings read about weighted ratings methods and then look at any trump content and see the vast numbers of people so dumb they still almost exclusively vote 1 or 10 thinking thats the most effective way to toss partisan skewing in under the radar.
Even the one 5 of 10 review that tries to paint itself as a review of reason. Still the deep bias is there plain to see.
Most people won't like it. That along with plenty other tale tell signs as it progresses give way to the reality this is someone with fairly strong left anti trump bias role playing some sort of reasoned moderate.
Much of the focus is to invalidate as "the proof or evidence" simply isn't there. Im sorry are there an excess of political content like this where the undeniable cited evidence and proof is always present? Like what things has he been watching and what standard does they think exists in such media?
At any rate they almost have a point until their true and clearly purposefully masked bias comes creeping to the surface comforted that they are approaching their goal and its safe to reduce the effort before reaching it.
Most of the political figures and presidents who have been assassinated or attempted tended to be actually at risk of accomplishing something.
Its interesting to think about such things like the list of popular victims or survivors of assassins. How much promise they held for the future or threat to some.
Also its important to note the kind of times general attitudes of the people and parties when no assassinations are occurring or failed attempts.
You can't kill the truth but you can bury it alive.
Now wonder about the sheer volume of noise and distraction and how quickly it has changed in nature and tone post win.
Is that really because people or scared of revenge or some totalitarian regime coming for them in the future? Or is that simply a bunch of kids realizing the jig is up and mom has called them home for dinner.
Now the best part is carefully reading the dated narratives and assertions about authority and quality of the individuals judgment or negative things like lying.
Of course its rated a not at all unreasonable 1 out of 10.
Heck if you want an idea of how much total bs is in the ratings read about weighted ratings methods and then look at any trump content and see the vast numbers of people so dumb they still almost exclusively vote 1 or 10 thinking thats the most effective way to toss partisan skewing in under the radar.
Even the one 5 of 10 review that tries to paint itself as a review of reason. Still the deep bias is there plain to see.
Most people won't like it. That along with plenty other tale tell signs as it progresses give way to the reality this is someone with fairly strong left anti trump bias role playing some sort of reasoned moderate.
Much of the focus is to invalidate as "the proof or evidence" simply isn't there. Im sorry are there an excess of political content like this where the undeniable cited evidence and proof is always present? Like what things has he been watching and what standard does they think exists in such media?
At any rate they almost have a point until their true and clearly purposefully masked bias comes creeping to the surface comforted that they are approaching their goal and its safe to reduce the effort before reaching it.
Most of the political figures and presidents who have been assassinated or attempted tended to be actually at risk of accomplishing something.
Its interesting to think about such things like the list of popular victims or survivors of assassins. How much promise they held for the future or threat to some.
Also its important to note the kind of times general attitudes of the people and parties when no assassinations are occurring or failed attempts.
You can't kill the truth but you can bury it alive.
Now wonder about the sheer volume of noise and distraction and how quickly it has changed in nature and tone post win.
Is that really because people or scared of revenge or some totalitarian regime coming for them in the future? Or is that simply a bunch of kids realizing the jig is up and mom has called them home for dinner.
As a lifelong educator, historian, and journalist, i occupy a world of.common sense, ethics, facts, law, logic, math, morality, rationality, reason, and science in my critical-thinking processes on what constitutes the real world around me. This moviemaker does not live in my world; he lives in some fantasy land where he can make up anything that makes him happy, get someone else to pay for the equipment, and then present it to an audience who wants to hear the same kind of "truths" that have no basis in common sense, ethics, facts, law, logic, math, morality, rationality, reason, or science. When 75 percent of modern Americans lack critical-thinking skills, this kind of "art" is what happens. Americans have a choice: enlightened citizenry as the Founding Fathers intended, or ...willful ignorance in a reality-distortion zone created of their own cognitive dissonance. This attempt at a film falls into the latter category-especially when one realizes the moviemaker was a convicted felon, pardoned by his subject. Common sense would have any rational thinker automatically reject such an attempt at moviemaking due to subjectivity and implicit bias. History and posterity is already laughing at this moviemaker.
Wusstest du schon
- VerbindungenFeatured in I Watched Three Terrible Conservative Documentaries (2025)
- SoundtracksUnstoppable
Written by Bryan E. Miller
Courtesy of Sensory Overload Music
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- We the Jury
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 1.372.091 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 774.874 $
- 29. Sept. 2024
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 1.372.091 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 36 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen