Baila, Vini - Fußballlegende Vinícius Júnior

It's not a matter of supporting one team on another, it is a matter of not letting his attitude spread among the next generation! Worst movie woth worst human being and worst player ever,

Let's talk about the movie, it is focusing on his emotions instead of what happened, how it happened and most important why people are having such a negative impact upon his character,

The movie should included espain POV about hosting WC and Vini conference, and how the media talked about it,

Any way he feels he should have a huge respect in football, he thinks he should be treated like Ronaldinho and R9, boy be respectful like them, then we can talke.

Honestly, Baila, Vini is a disappointing documentary. Instead of giving viewers a raw, honest look at Vinícius Júnior's journey, it feels more like a forced tribute made to boost his ego. It's overly polished, full of cliché motivational lines, and lacks any real emotional depth or critical perspective.

The storytelling is shallow and repetitive - we get it, he's talented and successful. But there's barely any nuance. It avoids tough questions, skips over meaningful analysis, and just surrounds Vinícius with praise from his friends and teammates. That's not a documentary; that's marketing.

The worst part? It treats serious topics like racism as just another dramatic beat, instead of engaging with the complexity of the issue. It ends up feeling exploitative, not enlightening.

Overall, the film is boring, predictable, and feels premature - like it was made ten years too early. For someone with such a bright career, Vinícius deserves a better, more honest story.

Baila, Vini or whatever this is called tries to pass itself off as an inspiring story of overcoming adversity, but in reality, it's nothing more than a heavily biased PR campaign for Vinícius Jr. Disguised as a documentary. Instead of offering a balanced and honest look at his career and the controversies surrounding him, it paints him as a flawless hero while vilifying everyone else who has ever opposed him - particularly fans, clubs, and even entire cities.

The film repeatedly shows Vinícius as a victim, but fails to acknowledge how often he instigates confrontation on the pitch. His taunting celebrations, disrespectful gestures, and unnecessary theatrics are conveniently omitted or framed as "passion." There's zero accountability or nuance here - just a carefully curated narrative that rewrites every incident to suit his image.

Worst of all, the documentary unfairly defames others, especially Valencia CF and their supporters, with broad accusations that lack proper context. The film simplifies a complex and sensitive issue into a black-and-white story where Vinícius is always right, and everyone else is always wrong. This kind of lazy storytelling only stirs more division, rather than promoting real awareness or progress.

If you're looking for an honest exploration of a player's journey, skip this. Baila, Vini is not a documentary - it's damage control.

I had high hopes for a documentary about Vinícius Júnior - one of the most exciting young players in football today - but this film completely missed the mark. Instead of offering a deep dive into his journey, challenges, or growth as a player and person, we get a surface-level highlight reel padded with clichés and emotional music.

The storytelling is disjointed, and there's little real insight into who Vini actually is off the pitch. It feels more like PR than a true documentary. Even the serious moments, like tackling racism in football, are handled in a way that feels more like posturing than thoughtful engagement.

If you're looking for a raw, honest look at a footballer's life, this isn't it. It's a glossy commercial pretending to be a documentary. Save your time.

Another Netflix agenda has sparked yet another wave of discussions. At the center is a person many consider a victim, but in my opinion, he is more of a provocateur. His actions and statements are clearly aimed at attracting attention, which provokes various reactions from the public. On one hand, you can understand him - in a world where the noise of information grows every day, it's hard to go unnoticed. On the other hand, this kind of behavior raises many questions about the authenticity of his intentions. Is he truly a victim of circumstances, or is he consciously using his position for manipulation? This makes us reflect on how we perceive people in the media space and the role provocations play in shaping public opinion.

And honestly, I'm frustrated with IMDb for not allowing me to write in Cyrillic here! It's ridiculous that a global platform restricts users from expressing themselves in their native script. This kind of limitation only adds unnecessary barriers to genuine communication and cultural diversity online.