smartsagatrian

I went to watch the movie after watching movie like drishm2 ,ved .my expectations was i will see a masterclass . Pathaan movie is just a copied version of fast and furious, tiger Zinda Hain,war.plot of film is very common,not new story.. direction is good, some scenes are excellent shooted with abroad shooting.special effect and VFX are ok type.. shahrukh tries to give a good performance but he as action hero doesn't appeal.cameo of srk and Salman Khan was high point of movie.dimple kapadia was good,her performance was strong and powerful.deepika was more glamorous and Less agent,,she could have been used better.john abrahim was awesome,his swag was great his looks hunky, style,panesh,he was more better than srk...in all movie was not bad ,not good..I wouldn't watch movie for second time.my issue is after I left theatre thier was no scene tht I would remember for long time..it's a average movie not epic.. spend upto 300 rs only for ticket not more . Pathan hype is more content is less.

To start of the review its ok a ok ok movie, brahmastra if was properly narrated with proper explanation of the story with a pin point direction it would have been block buster with people waiting for next series Brahmastra which is theme of whole plot was not given perfect valuation and it's proper creation why and when instead director pays attention to love story of Shiva and isha aka Ranbir and alia.

Amitabh Bachchan was wasted In movie, dimple Kapadia why was she even thier , Sharukh khan and nagarjuna were good, specially Nagarjuna was good in small cameo.

Music is good.ranbir could have been better as Shiva,he is not good choice for role. Its larger than life role ,he could have been much better,he is just about ok Ayan Mukerji as director could have made a legendary movie but couldn't deliver knock out punch,you can just watch movie for visual effects which is new concept in Bollywood movie I would rate it 5 on 10.