Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Estrellas
Angela Paula Stander
- $50,000 Bucks Audience Member
- (as Angela Stander)
6,316.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Reseñas destacadas
Fast and Flippant. Entertainment with plot falls. Too many characters
This film delivers plenty of fun, energetic moments and strong chemistry among the cast, and my 11-year-old-along with many kids age 8-18 in the theater-absolutely loved the absurd, fast-moving magic and humor. Kids don't worry about whether the tricks make sense, and for them it's a blast.
But the writers, director and producers GROSSLY overproduce this flashy sequel to the max. Isla fisher wears a fancy dress in the woods or in action sequences that make your eyes roll. ANY REALISM from filmmakers would help.
For adult, the movie often feels closer to reality-show spectacle-think Masked Singer meets America's Got Talent-than a grounded cinematic story. Your magicians fight WWII Evil. The sets and character design are impressive, but the nonstop implausible stunts and plot holes make it hard to stay invested in the world they're trying to build.
Still, if you overlook the "jump-the-shark" magic moments and just enjoy the popcorn-movie chaos, it's entertaining enough. My daughter gave it an A. I landed on a B mostly thanks to Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg, who bring enough charm and humor to offset the rapid-fire absurdity. (We completed premier with Cinemascore voting.)
Like many sequels since the '80s, it tries to do too much-too many new characters, too much flash, too much caffeine-and in the process loses warmth, character focus, and believability. But it is entertainment, and we're glad we saw it in a theater, where the spectacle feels bigger and more fun than it would on a streaming screen.
But the writers, director and producers GROSSLY overproduce this flashy sequel to the max. Isla fisher wears a fancy dress in the woods or in action sequences that make your eyes roll. ANY REALISM from filmmakers would help.
For adult, the movie often feels closer to reality-show spectacle-think Masked Singer meets America's Got Talent-than a grounded cinematic story. Your magicians fight WWII Evil. The sets and character design are impressive, but the nonstop implausible stunts and plot holes make it hard to stay invested in the world they're trying to build.
Still, if you overlook the "jump-the-shark" magic moments and just enjoy the popcorn-movie chaos, it's entertaining enough. My daughter gave it an A. I landed on a B mostly thanks to Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg, who bring enough charm and humor to offset the rapid-fire absurdity. (We completed premier with Cinemascore voting.)
Like many sequels since the '80s, it tries to do too much-too many new characters, too much flash, too much caffeine-and in the process loses warmth, character focus, and believability. But it is entertainment, and we're glad we saw it in a theater, where the spectacle feels bigger and more fun than it would on a streaming screen.
Now You Wish You Hadn't See Them...
This was a very disappointing sequel that manages to completely miss anything good from the previous entries. The new characters don't come across as clever or appealing in any way and instead come across as annoying and ridiculous. The previous entries were entertaining and often thought provoking. This latest entry feels more like a chore to sit through and if they can't make a better sequel than this, it's probably time to stop making new entries in this "Now You See Me" franchise.
I wanted to love it
I have just watched the third film in this series, set roughly 10 years after the last.
The whole movie is around 10 people bickering. It is exhausting to watch and listen to. This movie is definitely for a younger generation than the last as this sort of constant barrage of verbal intercourse reminds me more of college kids bantering than anything else.
So, regardless of that its okay. Nice to see the band back together. Nothing going to set the world alight here just okay.
We do end up with what feels like the 10 horsemen but feel free to disagree.
The whole movie is around 10 people bickering. It is exhausting to watch and listen to. This movie is definitely for a younger generation than the last as this sort of constant barrage of verbal intercourse reminds me more of college kids bantering than anything else.
So, regardless of that its okay. Nice to see the band back together. Nothing going to set the world alight here just okay.
We do end up with what feels like the 10 horsemen but feel free to disagree.
10 Horsemen is 6 too many.
There are just far too many team members now (9 active to the plot and 1 more thrown in at the very end), and still it was missing one notable name from the second movie that would have elevated it more.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
Now you see me, but never again
How did a big budget, solid actor, much anticipated film yield such poor writing, directing and editing? Magic, apparently.
The trick here is to fool audiences into paying for this nonsense. Want to spend 2 hours of your life watching someone else ooh and aah in in a magic show or play in an escape room filmed on screen?. Only thing worse than the script may be Rosamund Pike's accent. Oy.
The trick here is to fool audiences into paying for this nonsense. Want to spend 2 hours of your life watching someone else ooh and aah in in a magic show or play in an escape room filmed on screen?. Only thing worse than the script may be Rosamund Pike's accent. Oy.
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
See a full list of all the movies coming to theaters this fall.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film was announced by Lions Gate Entertainment CEO Jon Feltheimer in May 2015, more than a year before Ahora me ves 2 (2016) was released in June 2016.
- PifiasMerritt McKinney knew what had happened to Thaddeus Bradley after Merrit was brought directly to the police station and the cell, likely without talking to anybody. He would not have known as he didn't see the shooting.
- ConexionesFollows Ahora me ves... (2013)
- Banda sonoraCrusades
written by Max Bassin, Dominic DiGesu, Gus Green, Foster Hudson, Cameron Winter
performed by Geese
courtesy of: Partisan Records / PIAS
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
- How long is Now You See Me: Now You Don't?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Now You See Me: Now You Don't
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Bélgica(Exterior)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 90.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 49.678.000 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 21.013.793 US$
- 16 nov 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 186.978.000 US$
- Duración
- 1h 53min(113 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta






