The Mauritanian

This is a difficult movie to watch or write a review on. At the core is outrage. Those who don't want to believe that such outrageous things could be done by their beloved country and those entrusted with its values and justice will deny its assertions to protect the vision they hold as sacred. Others will raise their fist and proclaim they fight for the right of those abused and violated. Both sides will claim they know the truth. I am not surprised by man's inhumanity. Indeed, my faith calls it original sin. The difference being, I believe we are all capable of it. But my faith also believes in deliverance and hope, responsibility and the power of redemption. This film does a remarkable job of representing this man's story. The performances are flawless. The storytelling is compelling. The warning is important. For those reasons, I give this film an 8 (well told) out of 10. {Drama}

I think The Mauritanian gives a very insightful look at the extent governments will go to coverup how the treat prisoners. Here in the United States and other countries around the world. Doing all that can be done to get false witness against anyone. The end does not justify the means, which is something brought to light in this movie. This is a true story from the story told in the book Guantánamo Diary, written by Mohamedou Ould Slahi. It tells of his experiences in Guantanamo Bay. Maybe one day we will learn to treat each others as humans and respect deserved until the facts are proven.

The movie gets its title from the GITMO inmate that is featured in this movie, based on a real person and his experiences. He is a Mauritanian.

The whole movie centers on one man's fate, he was arrested and accused in 2002 of being a key figure in the 9/11 attacks, but was detained for years without any charges. He was tortured to get him to confess.

Two supporting stories are told in parallel, frequently switching from one to the other. One is the military attorney charged with building a case to find him guilty and executed. The other is a New Mexico law firm defending him, not so much focusing on whether he was guilty or not, more on whether the USA constitution and laws were being followed.

Very interesting and very well made, the actors in the featured roles are all excellent, especially Jodie Foster and Benedict Cumberbatch.

I watched it at home on BluRay from my public library. My wife skipped.

This is a very very powerful film, that brings a very dark page of history to light. My heart is so heavy from the horror I saw. When the credits rolled, I didn't want to stop the film. I'm amazed by how he keeps his positivity, or even the will to live through years of darkness.

One can argue that a society shouldn't torture even its most committed enemies; or that torture is wrong because you might inflict it on the innocent. But one thing that is certain is that torture is a very bad way of finding out the truth: the guilty may confess, but the innocent will do so too, just to get the torture to end. Yet, in the wake of the terrorist attacks on the United States in 2021 and the subsequent wars, the U. S. government rounded up those it suspected of involvement, imprisoned them without trial, and subjected them to torture. Kevin Macdonald's film 'The Mauritanian' tells the story of one such victim. At first the film is hard to get into: it raises the possibility of the suspect's guilt (a possibility it does not so much allay as subsequently ignore) and saves the story of his torture to the end; the tale of that torture is then told impressionistically, rather than as a precise claim of exactly what was done. Also, a man languishes in gaol for 14 years: where's the plot in that? But the essential truth of how people were treated has been very well established, and the film does us an important service by bringing this to a wider audience. If civilised people are defined by how we treat our enemies, the story is a major fail for the west.