Christian Wolff aplica su mente brillante y sus métodos poco legales para reconstruir el rompecabezas sin resolver del asesinato de un jefe de Hacienda.Christian Wolff aplica su mente brillante y sus métodos poco legales para reconstruir el rompecabezas sin resolver del asesinato de un jefe de Hacienda.Christian Wolff aplica su mente brillante y sus métodos poco legales para reconstruir el rompecabezas sin resolver del asesinato de un jefe de Hacienda.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio y 3 nominaciones en total
Fernando Chien
- Sorkis
- (as Fernando Funan Chien)
Reseñas destacadas
It's been years since I watched "THE ACCOUNTANT" and I didn't watch it before going to see this one. I liked this movie and enjoyed it, but I felt like it was missing something. What that is, I don't know, I can't put my finger on it. Maybe I missed something. And whatever that something might have been, I think the movie could have been better.
I liked the dance scene, not so much the troupe that followed. The movie had a hero's heart and some great action. A solid matinee movie.
When the day comes when it goes to streaming, I'll be sure to watch the both movies back to back. Hopefully, I'll discover that missing ingredient.
I liked the dance scene, not so much the troupe that followed. The movie had a hero's heart and some great action. A solid matinee movie.
When the day comes when it goes to streaming, I'll be sure to watch the both movies back to back. Hopefully, I'll discover that missing ingredient.
The Accountant 2 doubles down on the action and humor over the first film. It does however try to juggle too many subplots that are poorly connected, leading to a less coherent film and a lack of a singular, hateable villain.
On the plus side, making Jon Bernthal a co-lead this time was incredibly smart. He and Affleck have great chemistry and Bernthal's Braxton is both a lethal threat and downright hilarious. This is easily his best role since The Punisher.
Like the first film, action isn't the primary focus, with a lot of time spent on enjoyable character moments. But when the action does arrive, it really delivers. Depending on what the new Mission: Impossible has in store for us, the Juarez shootout in this film may go down as the best action sequence of the year.
Again, I wish more of the character development had been focused on the villains, so we'd have a central antagonist who seems like a real threat. Instead we get several boring micro-villains.
I also wish the writing and editing were working in better harmony to bring us a more coherent story.
But all that said, Affleck and Bernthal have charm to spare, the final act is awesome, and this is a decent follow up to the admittedly better first film. 7/10.
On the plus side, making Jon Bernthal a co-lead this time was incredibly smart. He and Affleck have great chemistry and Bernthal's Braxton is both a lethal threat and downright hilarious. This is easily his best role since The Punisher.
Like the first film, action isn't the primary focus, with a lot of time spent on enjoyable character moments. But when the action does arrive, it really delivers. Depending on what the new Mission: Impossible has in store for us, the Juarez shootout in this film may go down as the best action sequence of the year.
Again, I wish more of the character development had been focused on the villains, so we'd have a central antagonist who seems like a real threat. Instead we get several boring micro-villains.
I also wish the writing and editing were working in better harmony to bring us a more coherent story.
But all that said, Affleck and Bernthal have charm to spare, the final act is awesome, and this is a decent follow up to the admittedly better first film. 7/10.
Tonally extremely different to the original movie as they aim to increase the comedic moments. Very weak plot which seemed to rely on paper thin character links.
Terrible oversights with character continuity for the actual accountant. He sounded and looked different - his wardrobe was actually that of Forrest Gump and they even mentioned that as a reference at one point. He doesn't seem to be working in the same way now, and just messing about with dating algorithms for laughs now?! Even if you buy into him making 9 years of effort to integrate, it just seemed too different and ultimately fans of the first movie are coming back for more of the same so development must be within some bounds, otherwise he is just a different character.
I was really upset that they turned his "Solomon Grundy" stim/soothe into a joke and then had him use it in absolutely the wrong moment - more like a punch/tag line. His father's routine over overstimulation that dominated the original to help him cope with the world was completely absent - nothing really seemed to trigger him this time at all.
Would go so far as to say that Jon Bernthal was absolutely wasted and his character was made to look like an idiot rather than a dangerous and whimsical guy.
Agent Medina was a bit of an afterthought who got in the way. Little character development and it seemed like she was just there to remind us all how "off book" the accountant and his brother are.
Honestly this was a terrible follow up to the first movie and we came home and immediately put on the original to try and wash away the mess that was this sequel. It was such an opportunity to really do something cool with the concept, and it was absolutely wasted.
Terrible oversights with character continuity for the actual accountant. He sounded and looked different - his wardrobe was actually that of Forrest Gump and they even mentioned that as a reference at one point. He doesn't seem to be working in the same way now, and just messing about with dating algorithms for laughs now?! Even if you buy into him making 9 years of effort to integrate, it just seemed too different and ultimately fans of the first movie are coming back for more of the same so development must be within some bounds, otherwise he is just a different character.
I was really upset that they turned his "Solomon Grundy" stim/soothe into a joke and then had him use it in absolutely the wrong moment - more like a punch/tag line. His father's routine over overstimulation that dominated the original to help him cope with the world was completely absent - nothing really seemed to trigger him this time at all.
Would go so far as to say that Jon Bernthal was absolutely wasted and his character was made to look like an idiot rather than a dangerous and whimsical guy.
Agent Medina was a bit of an afterthought who got in the way. Little character development and it seemed like she was just there to remind us all how "off book" the accountant and his brother are.
Honestly this was a terrible follow up to the first movie and we came home and immediately put on the original to try and wash away the mess that was this sequel. It was such an opportunity to really do something cool with the concept, and it was absolutely wasted.
The Accountant, like pizza, is decent even when mediocre. Unfortunately, like most sequels, this doesn't measure up to the original. The story and characters are more bland and vague where they shouldn't be, and more detailed and defined where it doesn't really help. Frankly, it turned out more like a generic TV action movie. More of the same, but not as good. Bad guys get killed, but the reasons are far more generic and vague. The story and plausibility took a big hit. Not all the action sequences works as well as the last one. They tried to me more jokey here, but only about half land. But, given the sad state of movies these days, I don't mind supporting a "noble" effort.
I really enjoyed the first 'The Accountant' so had high expectations for the follow up.
Sadly, I was very dissappointed.
The first film had some logic, it made sense, it had a story. So made the all action nonsense plausible and therefore excusable as 'artistic license.
The Accountant 2 is all action nonsense.
It makes very little sense. Very weak on story and logic i.e. Not believable for the audience to invest in it.
E.g. Why would Ray King in retirement, spend all his money 'investigating' alone and particularly for one child ?
Why would Chris (Affleck) reveal his computer help source (Justine) and her location so glibly.
It was absurd how the woman assassin was supposed to be the woman in the picture, It was also absurd how she was more like a terminator than a person.
And there are many more such issues, that prevent the story from flowing logically and therefore immersing the audience in a journey.
Instead you are repeatedly 'jolted' out, asking what? Why? When? Sort of questions, which don't have answers.
Ben Affleck is looking a bit aged and gaunt, but he and the guy who plays Braxton , played their parts compentently, but were let down by the weak script.
It does have some laughs, It's not terrible, just very mediocre, certainly nowhere near as good as the first film.
Would I watch this again ? No, it's too glib and lacks cohesion.
Yet, I have watched the first film several times and I will watch it again.
Very dissappointed and I felt this was a missed opportunity.
Not worth a full price cinema ticket.
Sadly, I was very dissappointed.
The first film had some logic, it made sense, it had a story. So made the all action nonsense plausible and therefore excusable as 'artistic license.
The Accountant 2 is all action nonsense.
It makes very little sense. Very weak on story and logic i.e. Not believable for the audience to invest in it.
E.g. Why would Ray King in retirement, spend all his money 'investigating' alone and particularly for one child ?
Why would Chris (Affleck) reveal his computer help source (Justine) and her location so glibly.
It was absurd how the woman assassin was supposed to be the woman in the picture, It was also absurd how she was more like a terminator than a person.
And there are many more such issues, that prevent the story from flowing logically and therefore immersing the audience in a journey.
Instead you are repeatedly 'jolted' out, asking what? Why? When? Sort of questions, which don't have answers.
Ben Affleck is looking a bit aged and gaunt, but he and the guy who plays Braxton , played their parts compentently, but were let down by the weak script.
It does have some laughs, It's not terrible, just very mediocre, certainly nowhere near as good as the first film.
Would I watch this again ? No, it's too glib and lacks cohesion.
Yet, I have watched the first film several times and I will watch it again.
Very dissappointed and I felt this was a missed opportunity.
Not worth a full price cinema ticket.
New and Upcoming Sequels, Prequels, and Spin-Offs
New and Upcoming Sequels, Prequels, and Spin-Offs
Discover some of the most anticipated sequels, prequels, and spin-offs coming to theaters and streaming.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesIn February 2020, Ben Affleck revealed there were talks about a follow-up to El contable (2016), but they had yet to nail down a script. At the same time, he also mentioned there were talks of developing a TV series based on the film.
- PifiasWhen the hackers gain access to the selfie lady's computer, they have no reason to distract her. With anything close to the level of access they have at that point they would just copy the files out. Taking over her desktop is completely pointless.
- Citas
Christian Wolff: The fall didn't kill him. It was the abrupt stop.
- ConexionesFollows El contable (2016)
- Banda sonoraSee-Line Woman
Written by George Bass and Nina Simone
Performed by Danielle Ponder and Bryce Dessner
Produced by Bryce Dessner
Courtesy of Saddest Factory Records
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Accountant 2?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 80.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 65.523.366 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 24.533.959 US$
- 27 abr 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 103.223.366 US$
- Duración
- 2h 12min(132 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta