Gangs of London

I dont think that the producers set out to make a realistic portrayal of gang life in London. This was created for entertainment purposes and needs to be viewed as such. Gareth Evans forte is extreme action sequences and this is undoubtedly where this series excels. The action set pieces are truly intense and very over the top. People don't just get killed on this show. they are butchered and the concept of less is more is left on the floor as teams of machine gun wielding mercenaries do battle with crazed criminal families and drug kingpins in seemingly never ending gunfights. The police never seem to hear all this gunplay and the criminals are able to "clean up". Now, i find all this totally acceptable ...as I said this is not an in depth of portrayal of gang culture in London it is a series made in the spirit of entertainment for those of us who like their action as stylised as a Kung Fu movie with a side order of extra tomato sauce ...by the bucket load!!

Sure, season 1 had its issues. Unbelievable scenarios, undercooked characters and weird pacing with it peaking at the halfway point, and then lumbering onwards. So yeah, you had to turn a significant portion of grey matter off to enjoy it, but man, it was worth it for the fights/shootouts choreography, editing and brutality. And if you could suspend the huge amount of disbelief and shark jumping, it was pretty entertaining with how over the top it ended up being.

Season 2, on the other hand, has made the mistake of doubling down on all the ridiculous and sub par elements of character writing and plot, asking us to turn off our brains to the point of drooling lobotomy, whilst offering almost none of the rewards of excellent fights/shootouts, editing, creative camerawork and crazy conspiracy cheese of the previous season.

I can't even be bothered to list or explain how bad all the elements of season 2 are. It is just SO stupid, it's beyond belief! Beyond the suspension of disbelief capability of anything with a consciousness.

From the practically total absence of police/ bystanders or concern for leaving evidence everywhere. Like just dragging a freshly murdered gangster from a car, for no reason, in front of security cameras and an amazingly oblivious staff member. To having a skinny woman who you could believe with some effort, could be capable of shooting many men in season 1, to entirely unbelievably beating a number of beefy men in hand to hand combat in season 2. To the point where a main character somehow has a 10x zoom level on a 1x optic at the end, to the ammo capacity of handguns rivalling a drum magazine, to the very poorly integrated digital blood/fire/explosion effects... to even call season 2 stupid is an insult to stupidity.

I don't know if the new producers, apparent non-involvement of Gareth Evans, if the budget was drastically reduced, if some kind of Covid related restrictions/ people just not bothering to do a half decent job at anything any more, or what is responsible for it... but it is borderline unwatchable now. However it does continue the story and have occasional flashes of what made season 1 good.

I can't fathom anyone greenlighting a season 3 after this, but if they do, they'd better make sure they wrap it up with a home run.

Here's the issue with trying to review series, where one season is vastly inferior to another. I'm leaving my overall rating as is, for the excellence in parts of season 1, which truly do deserve merit.

Season 1 - 8/10.

Season 2 - 4/10.

Gangs of London is just a flat out awesome show. I do agree with most of the reviews that season 1 was better than 2. Even though season 2 is still worth watching, it just doesn't measure up to the greatness which was season 1. Some people don't like it because of how brutal it gets but I don't get what they were expecting from a show about gangs? It is so much more than just some action show too...it's a very intense drama that will keep you at the edge of your seat. Some people want to compare it to Peaky Blinders and while it's not quite as good as that it's still a really good show. I think because both are violent British crime dramas they get compared a lot. I would highly recommend this to anyone who likes a good action drama.

Violence occurs not only in London but Internationally. It begins as a family response to the killing of a godfather figure in London that held the various gangs together for the greater good. With his demise killing became the focus of this series. But, if that was all there is to the series it would be completely unwatchable. The series goes much deeper than the violence and gore as individuals in the different gangs attempt to survive as well as retaliating against the violence directed at them. There are betrayals as well as loyalties and there are efforts to protect family members as the incredible violence increases. Some scenes are so intense and gory it becomes difficult to not avert watching. The one missing element in the series is a significant lack of law enforcement involvement with all of the unrelenting carnage occurring. There also is a total lack of morality with virtually every principle character.

Gangs of London is like a chaotic game of chess played by hooligans in the streets of Britain. This TV show takes the concept of organized crime and turns it into a bloody masterpiece. It's like watching a Shakespearean tragedy, but with more guns and explosions. The characters are as complex as a Rubik's Cube, and just as colorful. From the ruthless Finn Wallace to the enigmatic Elliot Finch, each one is like a piece on the board, moving with their own agenda. But be warned, this show is not for the faint of heart. It's like diving headfirst into a pool of sharks, where every episode leaves you gasping for air. So, if you're looking for a thrilling rollercoaster ride that will leave you questioning your own morality, then Gangs of London is the show for you.

The action in Gangs of London is like a fireworks display on Guy Fawkes Night. It's explosive, mesmerizing, and leaves you in awe. From the first episode to the last, the show delivers jaw-dropping fight scenes that will make your adrenaline spike. It's like watching a ballet, but instead of tutus and pointe shoes, you have blood and broken bones. The choreography is impeccable, and the violence is as British as a cup of tea. But don't let the action distract you from the intricate plot. It's like a spider's web, weaving together the different gangs and their power struggles. Each twist and turn is like a punch to the gut, leaving you breathless and wanting more.

Now, let's talk about the performances in Gangs of London. They are like a symphony conducted by a madman. Each actor brings their A-game, delivering performances that are as captivating as a Shakespearean soliloquy. Joe Cole as Sean Wallace is a force to be reckoned with, portraying the conflicted heir to the throne with intensity and vulnerability. But it's Sope Dirisu as Elliot Finch who steals the show. His performance is like a magic trick, keeping you guessing and questioning his motives until the very end. And let's not forget about Michelle Fairley as Marian Wallace, the matriarch of the family. Her performance is like a thunderstorm, commanding attention and leaving you in awe of her power.

In conclusion, Gangs of London is a wild ride that will leave you on the edge of your seat. It's like a rollercoaster that takes you through the dark underbelly of the city, where danger lurks around every corner. The show is a masterclass in storytelling, with a plot that is as intricate as a spider's web. The action is explosive and the performances are top-notch. But be warned, this show is not for the faint of heart. It's like diving into a pool of sharks, where every episode leaves you gasping for air. So, if you're ready to embark on a thrilling and bloody journey, then buckle up and join the gangs of London. Just don't forget to bring a helmet and a bulletproof vest.