PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,8/10
14 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una mujer opta por un procedimiento para ser clonada luego de ser diagnosticada con un mal terminal, pero cuando milagrosamente se recupera, sus intentos de retirar su clon fracasan, lo que ... Leer todoUna mujer opta por un procedimiento para ser clonada luego de ser diagnosticada con un mal terminal, pero cuando milagrosamente se recupera, sus intentos de retirar su clon fracasan, lo que lleva a un duelo a muerte ordenado por la corte.Una mujer opta por un procedimiento para ser clonada luego de ser diagnosticada con un mal terminal, pero cuando milagrosamente se recupera, sus intentos de retirar su clon fracasan, lo que lleva a un duelo a muerte ordenado por la corte.
- Premios
- 2 premios y 5 nominaciones en total
Kristofer Gummerus
- Tom
- (as Kristofer Gummerrus)
Reseñas destacadas
I wish I'd have known it was the "Art of Self-Defense" guy going into this. I was expecting something vey different from the trailer. Something more interesting or exciting. Even knowing that now I still dont think it comes close to measuring up.
The premise is true to the synopsis. Sarah is dying and decides to get cloned, but upon learning she wont be dying, in order to live she has to kill her clone in ritual combat. Sounds really cool. Its not. It's drab and boring, not accidently, intentionally. Everyone talks like robots and you're supposed to be only amused by the general absurdity of it all. Its barely longer than a short film, so that is literally all of it.
The problem is that it's just not funny or interesting. There's no highs or lows here. There's no humor in 90% of the film. Theres exactly 2 gags and the rest is played painfully straight. It's hard to describe but imagine a wes anderson movie except theres nothing hipster, bizarre or ridiculous. Its very very subdued, cloyingly desperate for you to think it's funny because of that. It reminded me of the Monty Python sketch "I came for an argument", except played straight and there's no punchlines or audience surrogate and you're supposed to laugh at the idea of such a facility. You get what its "trying" to do, but instead of laughing you just roll your eyes and feel bored.
Whats really disappointing is that I liked the "Art of Self-defense". It was pretty wacky and out there. There was some tension, hilarity and twists. Remove all that and this is what you have.
I assume this wes anderson-esque monotone absurdist comedy is this writer/director style otherwise Id say this movie would have worked better if the characters all acted like real people. If it "needs" to have this tone then it needed to be much more interesting or ridiculous. Like have them hunting each other throughout the movie instead of it mostly being people sitting around being awkward robots.
I'd give it a lower score but theres a few scenes I briefly found "fun". Especially when Karen Gillian gets angry and actually shows some emotion. I wanted much more of that. Otherwise this doesn't rate slowburn. Its just boring.
The premise is true to the synopsis. Sarah is dying and decides to get cloned, but upon learning she wont be dying, in order to live she has to kill her clone in ritual combat. Sounds really cool. Its not. It's drab and boring, not accidently, intentionally. Everyone talks like robots and you're supposed to be only amused by the general absurdity of it all. Its barely longer than a short film, so that is literally all of it.
The problem is that it's just not funny or interesting. There's no highs or lows here. There's no humor in 90% of the film. Theres exactly 2 gags and the rest is played painfully straight. It's hard to describe but imagine a wes anderson movie except theres nothing hipster, bizarre or ridiculous. Its very very subdued, cloyingly desperate for you to think it's funny because of that. It reminded me of the Monty Python sketch "I came for an argument", except played straight and there's no punchlines or audience surrogate and you're supposed to laugh at the idea of such a facility. You get what its "trying" to do, but instead of laughing you just roll your eyes and feel bored.
Whats really disappointing is that I liked the "Art of Self-defense". It was pretty wacky and out there. There was some tension, hilarity and twists. Remove all that and this is what you have.
I assume this wes anderson-esque monotone absurdist comedy is this writer/director style otherwise Id say this movie would have worked better if the characters all acted like real people. If it "needs" to have this tone then it needed to be much more interesting or ridiculous. Like have them hunting each other throughout the movie instead of it mostly being people sitting around being awkward robots.
I'd give it a lower score but theres a few scenes I briefly found "fun". Especially when Karen Gillian gets angry and actually shows some emotion. I wanted much more of that. Otherwise this doesn't rate slowburn. Its just boring.
Dual has an intriguing (albeit not entirely original) concept with a lot of comic and dramatic potential.
But the film is stuck in tonal limbo, being neither really funny nor especially poignant.
Dual's setting is its greatest strength. Its world always feels a little off-kilter and subtly dystopian.
But the storytelling is simply not engaging.
The writing feels bland and lazy.
The actors look mostly bored.
Riley Stearns is an interesting filmmaker. His first (and best) film Faults struck the right balance between absurdity and realism.
Since then he's gone on to adopt a more Lanthimos-ish tone, which seems overly self-conscious and gimmicky.
While that may have worked in his previous film, The Art of Self Defense, it doesn't in Dual.
I hope he returns to his earlier style for the next one.
But the film is stuck in tonal limbo, being neither really funny nor especially poignant.
Dual's setting is its greatest strength. Its world always feels a little off-kilter and subtly dystopian.
But the storytelling is simply not engaging.
The writing feels bland and lazy.
The actors look mostly bored.
Riley Stearns is an interesting filmmaker. His first (and best) film Faults struck the right balance between absurdity and realism.
Since then he's gone on to adopt a more Lanthimos-ish tone, which seems overly self-conscious and gimmicky.
While that may have worked in his previous film, The Art of Self Defense, it doesn't in Dual.
I hope he returns to his earlier style for the next one.
It's not for everyone, I'd admit.
If you enjoyed "the art of self defense", I think you would like this movie.
I think the title is clever, having a dual meaning.
If you enjoyed "the art of self defense", I think you would like this movie.
I think the title is clever, having a dual meaning.
Imagine there's a clone, who's now living in your home, an almost perfect doppelganger, taken straight from the lab's hanger. It's a sympathetic swap, as your time has come to drop, all your family need to know, is you'll never let them go.
Though your clock continues ticking, while your feet are all still kicking, and the one who thinks they're you, has made an impressive debut. But the law has made a rule, to remove one in a duel, when your name is on the roster, you can fight your own imposter.
Not that original and with little reflective value.
Though your clock continues ticking, while your feet are all still kicking, and the one who thinks they're you, has made an impressive debut. But the law has made a rule, to remove one in a duel, when your name is on the roster, you can fight your own imposter.
Not that original and with little reflective value.
Great Sci-Fi that relies on the story and not unnecessary over-the-top special effects. I felt like this movie could be telling about what we have in store in the future. Every character is somewhat robotic, and without feeling or personality...much like a society where indoctrination has voided all critical thought and reason. That's my take anyway.
Beautifully shot, score was well done, and acting really portrayed the uncaring nature of society. Great film!
Beautifully shot, score was well done, and acting really portrayed the uncaring nature of society. Great film!
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesFilmed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tampere, Finland was chosen as the filming location because of the Finnish government's successful effort to curb corona cases.
- PifiasAt the start of the film when Robert Michaels is trying to kill his double, his double can be seen sticking his arm out from behind the table, but then a split second later the arrow misses his arm and hits him just above his heart. Given the double's body position and the fact that he's turning away from the arrow when it is being fired, it would be physically impossible for the arrow to strike him where it did.
- Créditos adicionalesIn the end credits, the credit for "Police Officers with Dog" lists the dog, Taika, first, and the trainer, Katja Kontu, last.
- Banda sonoraGrand March - Aida
Written by Giuseppe Verdi (uncredited)
Arranged by Cornelius Oberhauser and Ferdinand Oberhauser
Courtesy of APM Music
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Dual?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 4.500.000 € (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 185.212 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 118.254 US$
- 17 abr 2022
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 425.909 US$
- Duración1 hora 34 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta