PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,5/10
1,1 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una heredera descubre que el simpático joven que conoció en Sun Valley es en realidad un reportero de investigación, ella arruina su carrera al afirmar falsamente que están casados.Una heredera descubre que el simpático joven que conoció en Sun Valley es en realidad un reportero de investigación, ella arruina su carrera al afirmar falsamente que están casados.Una heredera descubre que el simpático joven que conoció en Sun Valley es en realidad un reportero de investigación, ella arruina su carrera al afirmar falsamente que están casados.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Jimmy Ames
- Truck Driver
- (sin acreditar)
Charles Arnt
- Mr. Bissell
- (sin acreditar)
William Bailey
- Reporter at Airport
- (sin acreditar)
Brandon Beach
- Reporter
- (sin acreditar)
John Butler
- Process Server
- (sin acreditar)
Harry Carter
- Reporter
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesTyrone Power also starred in the original version of the film, Amor y periodismo (1937), in much the same role. His co-stars were Loretta Young, Don Ameche and George Sanders.
- Citas
Sara Farley: Oh, I'll - I'll call the police.
Thomas Jefferson Tyler: Good! Tell them I'm not your husband. Don't let me go through life with that blot on my record.
- Créditos adicionalesOpening credits shown against a background of newspapers.
- ConexionesRemake of Amor y periodismo (1937)
Reseña destacada
This is an odd film--not because it is a remake but because both the original (LOVE IS NEWS) and the remake star Tyrone Power. It's rare to see a star do this, as the studios often remade films but hardly ever used the same actors. In addition, both films are bundled together on one DVD so you can compare them. After seeing both, I would definitely recommend you see LOVE IS NEWS, as it's superior in every way.
The film is about newspaper man (Power) harassing a rich heiress (Gene Tierney) in order to make headlines. It really didn't seem to matter if his articles were true and when Gene finds out that Tyrone is NOT the man he claims to be but a reporter, she is furious. However, instead of blowing her top, she decides to give him a taste of her own medicine by announcing to all the newspapers that she and Power are married--as she knows that the papers will now make Power's life miserable as well. Oddly, in the original film, the heiress announces they are engaged--here she claims they are married--though this hardly improves the quality of the film (though it does provide a bit of sexual innuendo the original didn't have).
The acting is decent enough, though I really think Loretta Young did a better job in the original--probably because she seemed to have a better gift for comedy. Also, while Tyrone tries, he just doesn't seem to have quite the charm he did in the original. Part of this is naturally because it's a remake and part of this is because the supporting characters weren't nearly as strong. In particular, the Justice of the Peace was a big weak point here, as instead of coming off as comical, he's a sadist and pretty much ignores the law--surefire comedy killers! My advice is see the original. Then, if you insist, see the remake. BUT, don't see the remake first--it just doesn't stack up well and might convince you not to bother with the first film and that would be a big mistake.
The film is about newspaper man (Power) harassing a rich heiress (Gene Tierney) in order to make headlines. It really didn't seem to matter if his articles were true and when Gene finds out that Tyrone is NOT the man he claims to be but a reporter, she is furious. However, instead of blowing her top, she decides to give him a taste of her own medicine by announcing to all the newspapers that she and Power are married--as she knows that the papers will now make Power's life miserable as well. Oddly, in the original film, the heiress announces they are engaged--here she claims they are married--though this hardly improves the quality of the film (though it does provide a bit of sexual innuendo the original didn't have).
The acting is decent enough, though I really think Loretta Young did a better job in the original--probably because she seemed to have a better gift for comedy. Also, while Tyrone tries, he just doesn't seem to have quite the charm he did in the original. Part of this is naturally because it's a remake and part of this is because the supporting characters weren't nearly as strong. In particular, the Justice of the Peace was a big weak point here, as instead of coming off as comical, he's a sadist and pretty much ignores the law--surefire comedy killers! My advice is see the original. Then, if you insist, see the remake. BUT, don't see the remake first--it just doesn't stack up well and might convince you not to bother with the first film and that would be a big mistake.
- planktonrules
- 9 ene 2009
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is That Wonderful Urge?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- That Wonderful Urge
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 1.650.000 US$
- Duración1 hora 22 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Ese impulso maravilloso (1948) officially released in India in English?
Responde