La sombra del zar amarillo

Gregory Peck is a Nobel Prize-winning American scientist who has been recruited by the US government to go into China to steal the secret for a new enzyme that would do much to feed the starving of the world. And, oddly, the extremely closed Chinese let him in and wine and dine him. He even gets a nice cozy little audience with the ever-adorable Mao (just because he was responsible for more deaths than Hitler doesn't mean he's not a swell guy in this film). Little does Peck know, however, that the evil US government implanted an explosive device into his skull along with a transmitter (which he does know about). Will they detonate him to kill the Chairman or is there mission the one they stated at the beginning of the film?

Considering that the film is about an American espionage agent in Communist China circa 1969, you'd sure think it would be an exciting film. Add to that the talent of Gregory Peck and it seems like a guaranteed winner. Instead, the film just limps along to a less than thrilling and ridiculous conclusion.

One of the major problem is that Peck plays a scientist who hates working for US intelligence but has done so in the past. Yet oddly, despite his strong bias against the spy game, he agrees to risk his life by going into China--and you keep wondering why. His motivations seem mixed at best and this is perhaps the worst part of the film. Additionally, as the film progresses, you see that the film makers employ moral relativism--showing the US and China are basically the same. In this film, the US would love to starve the world in order to maintain its power. But comparing Mao's regime (best estimates 25-100 million killed during his rule--I guess you gotta break a few eggs to make this omelet) to the US seemed a bit...well....insane. Throw into the mix that the US and USSR are now good buddies in the film and you are left wondering who, if anyone, to root for in the movie. This really is THE main problem with the film.

Another problem, though not as severe, is the relative ease with which Peck enters China and eventually leaves China. You didn't just do this in the 1960s--heck, you don't just do this today! His ease in escaping seemed rather dumb and you know that in reality the Chinese during this time were pretty ruthless and far from dumb. Purges and counter-revolution fever were rampant--as was xenophobia (which, fortunately, has changed a lot over the years). In such a crazed environment, a 6' 3" American would probably be spotted and captured very, very quickly!

Overall, this is one of Peck's misfires. The film never seems credible though it is an interesting time-passer provided you don't think through the details too much.

Energetic hokum treated as a bit of a lark by director J. Lee Thompson, that plays like a tv pilot combining elements from 'Fantastic Voyage' and 'Escape from New York'; and anticipates the TV series 'Search Control'.

Anne Heywood is hardly in it, so most of her role was probably lost in the final edit; instead we see much more of classy thesps in uniform Arthur Hill and Alan Dobie, back at Mission Control.

Summoned by the President of the United States on the red phone, internationally famous molecular biologist Gregory Peck swaggers into a fanciful version of Cultural Revolution China (actually shot at Pinewood and in Wales and Taiwan) full of glamorous females, one of whom he endears himself to with the charming compliment "I read your paper on peptides. I thought it was brilliant - for a woman!"; after which he discusses realpolitik with Chairman Mao over a game of table tennis, with one of the Chinese in attendance inevitably played by Burt Kwouk.

An earlier review dismisses the "Cold War paranoia " reflected in this 1969 film. How ignorant. The Cold War was a product of the unremitting hostility of Soviet Russia and China against the U.S. Historical fact and anyone who thinks otherwise, like this commenter, merely reflects the moral equivalence and political correctness of our time, which doesn't believe in good and evil. Ironically it is these people who have the distorted view, not the earlier generation they patronize. Evidently this commenter never heard of the Korean War, in which we fought North Korea's and China's invasion of South Korea from 1950-53. Nor does he appear to have heard of the Quemoy- Martsu crises of the fifties, when the communists were threatening the nationalist regime on Taiwan, our ally. Nor the torrent of hostile propaganda against us. Again, look in the mirror before patronizing an earlier period of history.

I confess to not having seen this in 30 years,but politics and aging aside,I still remember it as a film that took on a different/ not usual subject(Red China) and had Gregory Peck giving an all out performance as a "layman" spy . It had a somewhat novel gadget factor with the monitoring listening device and the introduction of Mao's country as another "Player" in the big game of world control.The chase for the border was tense and very memorable (the U.S. actually working with the Soviets...who woulda thunk it?)It also boast top-notch production qualities(Score, direction and a fine supporting cast.)There's a funny part that I still remember ... Military guy Arthur Hill is taking the trigger-detonator of Peck's "brain-bomb" from a safe and noticing there's a "skull and crossbones" on it. Hill-"Whose the joker who did this?".........

It's discovered by Western authorities that Chinese scientists have developed a miracle enzyme that will enable crops to grow in the most unlikely of places. Naturally, these same Western authorities are very dubious that China will want to share this enzyme with the rest of the world, so they devise a mission, to be undertaken by a civilian. That civilian is Nobel Prize-winning American scientist / professor John Hathaway (Gregory Peck), and he will have to go into China and try to retrieve the formula to this enzyme. What he DOESN'T know is that his handlers (including Arthur Hill as a gruff, humorless General) just might have inserted an explosive device into Hathaway's head, to be set off should things go wrong.

"The Chairman" does have some things going for it, for sure, including the fact that some of it was indeed shot in the Far East. It receives capable direction from J. Lee Thompson, and features a typically excellent Jerry Goldsmith soundtrack, but it's true that it hinges far more on its dialogue than action / suspense set-pieces. Characters frequently discuss philosophies and politics in a true Cold War piece in which the Russians are actually America's allies in this mission. It isn't until the final third that "The Chairman" becomes more of a genuine spy *thriller*, as Hathaway flees for his life from Chinese soldiers, heading for the China-Russia border.

Peck makes the whole journey worthwhile, delivering a consistently engaging performance; when he's righteously indignant at the end of the story, you can't hardly blame him. He's well supported by Hill, the great Keye Luke as Hathaway's aged mentor, Francesca Tu as Lukes' daughter, Conrad Yama in a rather interesting, amiable turn as Chairman Mao, Ric Young as Yin, and Burt "Cato" Kwouk, who only turns up near the end.

While "The Chairman" may not appeal to espionage cinema fans across the board, the fact that it's so very much of its time does make it an interesting viewing.

Six out of 10.