Tarzán en el Amazonas

Plenty of eye-candy in the awesomely athletic form of Mike Henry, but too much monkey business (literally), too much "precocious orphan boy" stuff, and not nearly enough action until the climactic mano-a-mano fight between Tarzan and the evil tribal chief. The story is plodding and tiresome, and the direction is sometimes inept - strange, because it was done by the same man (Robert Day) who also made the solid "Tarzan The Magnificent" in 1960. ** out of 4.

It is some years since I saw this film but I still remember it vividly.I rate it much higher than all the other Tarzan films from the late forties to the present day.Mike Henry is adequate as Tarzan and Manuel Padilla Jr. is very natural in his role(he was later to play a similar role as Jai in the "Tarzan" television series of the sixties.)The supporting cast are fine too and the scenery is magnificent.Best of all however is the casting of Diana Millay as Ann.Combining beauty and brains this talented actress makes the lovely doctor she plays one of the most memorable heroines in any "Tarzan" film.

Mike Henry returns for another Tarzan adventure. Barcuna is a ruthless tribe leader who attacks and destroys villages, and takes young men as slaves so he can continue his reign of terror. Barcuna claims to own the jungle, and is feared by the tribesmen.

Tarzan is called upon to track down Barcuna, and stop him. He hitches a ride on the river with Captain Sam Bishop and a young orphan kid, Pepe, whom Sam looks after. Sam is to deliver medical supplies to Dr Anne Philips, who treats the natives. I enjoyed the bond that formed between Tarzan, and Sam and Pepe.

There's plenty of action and adventure in true Tarzan style. I've said this before and I'll say it again: Mike Henry is still the best cast actor to portray Tarzan. He is the epitome of a hunk with that muscled body and big stature, and does the famous character justice.

The nature setting allows for some stunning views, and the final fight scene between Tarzan and Barcuna on a bridge was quite thrilling, actually.

Would I watch it again? Well, even if just to drool over Mike Henry, yes!

What's with Jan Murray as a faux-Bogart from The African Queen? I can't even begin to describe how insane this movie is.

And what about Olympic decathelete Rafer Johnson as the evil Barcuna? -- Incidentally, how did all of these folks end up in Brazil? Jan Murray's interplay with little Pepe is like nothing I've ever seen.

Infamous Tarzan movie because of accident suffered by Mike Henry: he was bitten on the chin by Dinky, the chimpanzee playing Cheetah, which was "destroyed" for its action. But it is not as bad as I had been told. It is a welcome and nice, wide-screen change of setting in the Amazonian jungle, where the Ape Man goes after diamond-greedy Rafer Johnson and his bunch of painted mercenaries, all belonging to the ancient Jaguar cult. But as Henry's hair and make-up are in place most of the running time, the plot that could have been resolved in 70 minutes was "spiced" with footage and more footage (quite often scratched) of wild animals, vast views of the jungle, monkey's humor, the Amazon river, more animals, and a never-ending duel between ex-linebacker Henry and decathlon champ Johnson. But in the end the movie is colorful and bearable nonetheless.