PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,4/10
695
TU PUNTUACIÓN
La envejecida estrella de cine Alexandra del Lago, también conocida como la Princesa Kosmonopolis, se empareja con un joven apuesto, Chance Wayne, que en su día fue una promesa como actor, p... Leer todoLa envejecida estrella de cine Alexandra del Lago, también conocida como la Princesa Kosmonopolis, se empareja con un joven apuesto, Chance Wayne, que en su día fue una promesa como actor, pero que ha caído en la vida de gigoló.La envejecida estrella de cine Alexandra del Lago, también conocida como la Princesa Kosmonopolis, se empareja con un joven apuesto, Chance Wayne, que en su día fue una promesa como actor, pero que ha caído en la vida de gigoló.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Teddy Wilson
- Fly
- (as Theodore Wilson)
John Fleck
- Mission Man
- (as John W. Fleck)
Michael Wilding Jr.
- Morton Frasier
- (as Michael Wilding)
Reseñas destacadas
I was not aware when I went to watch this film that it was a remake of the classic Paul Newman Geraldine page one. We know that Elizabeth Taylor was in other Tennessee Williams movies and also with Paul Newman why she decided to make this one I have no idea. Her costars are negligible except for Rip Torn in a repeat performance. I love Elizabeth Taylor she's a very beautiful woman and a very fine actress I'm purposely not using was I can understand empathy for this character because she was also older and out of shape etc. but there's no comparison really and she does not shine through in this at all. When you have as good a movie as the original was sometimes it's just hard to remake and maybe shouldn't even be tried
First off, I have never seen the original, so there won't be any comparisons to Geraldine Page. I wouldn't know her if I fell over her, actually. When I said unbiased, I meant I would not be comparing this to the original film. I will say that this movie is awful.
Tennessee Williams is a bit over my head, I think, so parts of this film were lost on me. It seems that Alexandra De Lago (Elizabeth Taylor) had been a star, but she's faded considerably. Apparently, she was away from the screen for some time, so her appearance surprised people. I shouldn't doubt it, as the poster for her attempted comeback shows Elizabeth Taylor in her early 20s. No wonder they're startled. She's 30-odd years older than they thought. Senility has set in early, and she simply can't keep her train of thought going for more than a few minutes before it derails, leaving her hopelessly confused. I found myself giggling every time she yelled "Where I am? Who are you?" I don't think it's supposed to be funny, but I laughed. Hard.
While staying at what looks like a hotel on the beach, Alexandra (a.k.a. the Princess Kosmonopolis, of all things) meets a hunky "masssage therapist." I put that in quotation marks, because while people seem to think he's a massage therapist, he's really a gigolo that preys on weak-minded older women. Who's more weak-minded than our laid-off legend, Alexandra. Oh, he's all over her, rubbing her back, which I didn't want to see, and unzipping her muumuu. (That's what it is, you know. Didn't want to see it, either.) Next scene, they're driving down the road. What road? What happened? At this point, I was in the same fix as Alexandra--completely confused. I realized that they'd been involved intimately, but why in the heck would she hook up with that goofball? (Goofball is played by the dreadfully horrible Mark Harmon, I guess.) As the "plot" develops, Goofball reveals himself to be a pathetic would-be blackmailer, and Alexandra reveals herself to be an equally pathetic, blackmailing, sex-starved "monster." That's her word for them--they're monsters. She's right about something, for once.
Along the way, we're forced to watch Goofball try to find his dream girl, aptly named Heavenly; we also have to sit through Elizabeth Taylor's slightly confused portrayal. Did anyone help her with this? Did the director ever tell her what to do? Is she supposed to be hilarious? What is going on?!?
I give this two out of five stars, as I enjoy a good bad movie.
Tennessee Williams is a bit over my head, I think, so parts of this film were lost on me. It seems that Alexandra De Lago (Elizabeth Taylor) had been a star, but she's faded considerably. Apparently, she was away from the screen for some time, so her appearance surprised people. I shouldn't doubt it, as the poster for her attempted comeback shows Elizabeth Taylor in her early 20s. No wonder they're startled. She's 30-odd years older than they thought. Senility has set in early, and she simply can't keep her train of thought going for more than a few minutes before it derails, leaving her hopelessly confused. I found myself giggling every time she yelled "Where I am? Who are you?" I don't think it's supposed to be funny, but I laughed. Hard.
While staying at what looks like a hotel on the beach, Alexandra (a.k.a. the Princess Kosmonopolis, of all things) meets a hunky "masssage therapist." I put that in quotation marks, because while people seem to think he's a massage therapist, he's really a gigolo that preys on weak-minded older women. Who's more weak-minded than our laid-off legend, Alexandra. Oh, he's all over her, rubbing her back, which I didn't want to see, and unzipping her muumuu. (That's what it is, you know. Didn't want to see it, either.) Next scene, they're driving down the road. What road? What happened? At this point, I was in the same fix as Alexandra--completely confused. I realized that they'd been involved intimately, but why in the heck would she hook up with that goofball? (Goofball is played by the dreadfully horrible Mark Harmon, I guess.) As the "plot" develops, Goofball reveals himself to be a pathetic would-be blackmailer, and Alexandra reveals herself to be an equally pathetic, blackmailing, sex-starved "monster." That's her word for them--they're monsters. She's right about something, for once.
Along the way, we're forced to watch Goofball try to find his dream girl, aptly named Heavenly; we also have to sit through Elizabeth Taylor's slightly confused portrayal. Did anyone help her with this? Did the director ever tell her what to do? Is she supposed to be hilarious? What is going on?!?
I give this two out of five stars, as I enjoy a good bad movie.
The success of a film is based on one thing and one thing only - chemistry - and Elizabeth Taylor and Mark Harmon positively sizzle in this film. You cannot take your eyes off them. The casting is right out of heaven. The story, of course, is pure Tennessee Williams, sordid and nasty and southern, but who cares when you're looking at two utterly gorgeous creatures like Elizabeth Taylor and Mark Harmon. The story really takes a back seat to this production which is quite lavish and hardly has the look of a television movie which is what it was. With a top flight director like Nicholas Roeg, how can you miss? You can't! Valerie Perrine in a supporting role really stands out. She is absolutely luminous and holds her own with Taylor in their scenes together. The supporting cast generally is excellent but Taylor and Harmon just cannot be beat when they are together they are so extraordinary.
Sweet bird of youth... the liz taylor one. With mark harmon, probably best known for ncis. Princess is much older than the young beach boy and wannabe actor she's dating. And she has numerous health and psychological issues. They have made an agreement; princess will help chance become an actor, and he will provide companionship and sexual favors. A power struggle! But... chance has already made a date to see his old girlfriend. But the girlfriend's father (rip torn) is a bigshot in town, and wants chance punished. And gone. What will princess and chance learn? Will they find what they are searching for? Keep an eye out for valerie perrine.. she was samantha in can't stop the music. Directed by nicolas roeg. He had also done the man who fell to earth! This story is from tennessee williams, so we knew it was going to be a painful lesson. It gets pretty rough. Liz taylor had already won her oscars for woolf and butterfield 8.
Consider Tenneessee Williams one of the greats when it comes to play writing. 'Sweet Bird of Youth' is not quite 'Cat on a Hot Tin Roof', 'A Streetcar Named Desire' and 'The Glass Menagerie', but it is nonetheless classic Williams and one of his best. Due to many things, the powerful emotional impact, challenging themes daring and ahead of the time to tackle back then, richly drawn characters and intelligent, realistic dialogue.
There are two filmed versions. One being the 1962 feature film with Geraldine Page and Paul Newman. The other being this 1989 television film. While neither are in the same league as the play, there is no doubt in my mind that the former is the better version. The bold themes may not have had their full impact, but they were intact still (more so than other film adaptations of Williams' work at that time that, although with much to recommend on their own terms, not just toned down the material but ommitted content which the film didn't do as badly), the chemistry was electric and the performances powerful. In the 80s and 90s, there were a number of television films made adapted from Williams' work and most of them were more faithful in detail and content (if not always in spirit) than their feature film counterparts. This 1989 'Sweet Bird of Youth' is an exception.
In that while Williams' intentions are clear this felt like 'Sweet Bird of Youth' re-ordered and re-invented, which it actually essentially was. It contains revisions made by Williams himself and a wider range of his writing, but a large part of me felt that it was not for the better, while its dilligence is admirable it is somewhat too on the academic side. The chemistry isn't on the same level here than to before, the steam generally is missing and personally thought that Elizabeth Taylor and Mark Harmon didn't quite sizzle enough together all the way through. Pace-wise, it feels rather staid, needed more edge, and the action could have opened up more because there can be a filmed stage play feel here and don't think that was quite the intent.
Due to the re-work and re-interpretations, some of the story is rather jumpy and can feel confused, and some of the characters that were major before are abridged to extended cameo-like. Taylor looks beautiful but unlike the out of this world portrayal of Geraldine Page in the 1962 film (am really trying not to compare but it is inevitable rather in this aspect because the difference in quality is so wide) her performance is uneven. There are some intensely moving moments, but also some overwrought ones and those that show a lack of energy. Surprising seeing as she was experienced in Williams, especially good in 'Suddenly, Last Summer'.
Mark Harmon though is good and has the right amount of intensity, his chemistry with Taylor has moments. This is a case though of the supporting cast making more of an impression than the leads. Ronnie Claire Edwards and Cheryl Paris make a lot out of their rather abridged roles and Valerie Perrine is heavenly as Miss Lucy. The best performance comes from Williams specialist Rip Torn, and also the cast member being most familiar with the play so knows it inside out, as a malevolent with a pinch of subtlety Boss Finley.
'Sweet Bird of Youth' is pleasing to look at, with Taylor's costumes looking ravishing. Williams' dialogue has lost none of its order despite the nature of how the play has been adapted. The direction is respectable if never properly distinguished and there are parts that have tension and poignancy (just wish there was more though). If there is one thing this does better than the feature film, it is the ending which doesn't feel as tidy or as odds with the mostly bleak tone.
Altogether, interesting and worth a peek but somewhat bland. 5/10
There are two filmed versions. One being the 1962 feature film with Geraldine Page and Paul Newman. The other being this 1989 television film. While neither are in the same league as the play, there is no doubt in my mind that the former is the better version. The bold themes may not have had their full impact, but they were intact still (more so than other film adaptations of Williams' work at that time that, although with much to recommend on their own terms, not just toned down the material but ommitted content which the film didn't do as badly), the chemistry was electric and the performances powerful. In the 80s and 90s, there were a number of television films made adapted from Williams' work and most of them were more faithful in detail and content (if not always in spirit) than their feature film counterparts. This 1989 'Sweet Bird of Youth' is an exception.
In that while Williams' intentions are clear this felt like 'Sweet Bird of Youth' re-ordered and re-invented, which it actually essentially was. It contains revisions made by Williams himself and a wider range of his writing, but a large part of me felt that it was not for the better, while its dilligence is admirable it is somewhat too on the academic side. The chemistry isn't on the same level here than to before, the steam generally is missing and personally thought that Elizabeth Taylor and Mark Harmon didn't quite sizzle enough together all the way through. Pace-wise, it feels rather staid, needed more edge, and the action could have opened up more because there can be a filmed stage play feel here and don't think that was quite the intent.
Due to the re-work and re-interpretations, some of the story is rather jumpy and can feel confused, and some of the characters that were major before are abridged to extended cameo-like. Taylor looks beautiful but unlike the out of this world portrayal of Geraldine Page in the 1962 film (am really trying not to compare but it is inevitable rather in this aspect because the difference in quality is so wide) her performance is uneven. There are some intensely moving moments, but also some overwrought ones and those that show a lack of energy. Surprising seeing as she was experienced in Williams, especially good in 'Suddenly, Last Summer'.
Mark Harmon though is good and has the right amount of intensity, his chemistry with Taylor has moments. This is a case though of the supporting cast making more of an impression than the leads. Ronnie Claire Edwards and Cheryl Paris make a lot out of their rather abridged roles and Valerie Perrine is heavenly as Miss Lucy. The best performance comes from Williams specialist Rip Torn, and also the cast member being most familiar with the play so knows it inside out, as a malevolent with a pinch of subtlety Boss Finley.
'Sweet Bird of Youth' is pleasing to look at, with Taylor's costumes looking ravishing. Williams' dialogue has lost none of its order despite the nature of how the play has been adapted. The direction is respectable if never properly distinguished and there are parts that have tension and poignancy (just wish there was more though). If there is one thing this does better than the feature film, it is the ending which doesn't feel as tidy or as odds with the mostly bleak tone.
Altogether, interesting and worth a peek but somewhat bland. 5/10
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesWhile a guest on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in December 2019, Mark Harmon told a story about Elizabeth Taylor from the set of this movie: "She was such fun. She had a thing in her contract: she worked eight hours a day, and that was it. She'd arrive in the morning, and she was in wardrobe and made up, and she'd get out of her car, and she was ready to work. And then she had a woman who would come on the stage at eight hours and she'd just go [taps his watch], like this, and wherever we were she'd stand up and go, 'good night,' and was gone. And then we'd work for another six hours. And then I ended up doing all my closeups that first week with a stand-in , which is hard because [she's] a nice person, but [she's] not an actor, right? I was having a hard time, and I went to the producers and said, 'I've got a problem here,' and they said 'what do you want us to do about it, it's in her contract.' And I said [shrugs]. So now it's Monday and were on a location out in Altadena somewhere and for some reason that day she's been there two hours longer than her time and everybody knows it. It's like a working crew, so she's sitting on a couch, I'm standing right behind her, I'm on my mark, people are moving lights, and she's just sitting there like this [he crosses his hands on his lap]. And noise and people, you know, production, and all of a sudden in a voice about this loud [indicating his own moderate speaking tone] she says, 'all i have to say'--and everybody stops. and she waits until it's dead silent. And she said, 'is today, I have been here two hours longer than I am supposed to have been.' I'm standing behind her, and I go, 'Hey, Elizabeth, all I gotta say is welcome to the fucking club.' And she turned on me, with those blue eyes, and she went 'Oooh!' And I said, 'No, I'm not pitching you any grief at all, I'm really not. But here's the deal: you go home and we work another eight hours, and we're never going to get this done.' And she turned around, she just sat there very still, for twenty minutes, sat there. They come out, they go, 'we're ready,' she goes, 'Good night,' and she got up and left. So I'm looking to get fired, right? Next day, and from that point on to the rest of that picture, she's there every moment of that film to do everything there is to do. And at the wrap party, which she had at her house, with [her] Butterfield 8 Oscar and [her] Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf [Oscar] standing on that mantel, she wants to meet [everyone] at the door, and as you leave, she has a present for you...and she wants you to open it as she gives it to you. Its a sterling silver frame with a cast and crew picture, that says 'Thank you very much, Elizabeth Taylor.' And she gives me a little box, and I open it up, and it's a 1959 Hamilton Sea-Lectric watch, solid gold, and on the back, you flip it over, it says 'M.H., Two Hours, Tick-Tock, Love E.T.'"
- PifiasThis remake is set in the late 1950s. Yet Alexandra del Lago pays with a credit card, not with checks as in the original play and original film. Also some of the costuming, especially Heavenly's, is much later in style than the 1950's-early 1960s.
- Citas
Princess Kosmonopolis: By the time I was your age, I was already a legend
- ConexionesReferenced in The Late Show with Stephen Colbert: Mark Harmon/Caitlin Weierhauser (2019)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Sweet Bird of Youth
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta