La historia de Valerie Solanas, una radical de los años 60 que predicaba la misoginia en su manifiesto "Scum". Escribió un guion para una película que quería que produjera Andy Warhol, pero ... Leer todoLa historia de Valerie Solanas, una radical de los años 60 que predicaba la misoginia en su manifiesto "Scum". Escribió un guion para una película que quería que produjera Andy Warhol, pero después de que él la ignorara repetidamente.La historia de Valerie Solanas, una radical de los años 60 que predicaba la misoginia en su manifiesto "Scum". Escribió un guion para una película que quería que produjera Andy Warhol, pero después de que él la ignorara repetidamente.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 5 premios y 7 nominaciones en total
- Gerard Malanga
- (as Donovan Leitch)
- Paul Morrisey
- (as Reg Rodgers)
Reseñas destacadas
Lili Taylor is absolutely amazing. However Valerie's aggressively grating character makes it difficult to fully embrace this movie. There is no real tension. The ending is already shown. It's basically an one-woman show. It goes a long way but for me, it doesn't go far enough for greatness. It's one note played over and over again.
Judging biopics in terms of historical accuracy is for the most part a futile exercise. There is no 'truth', only interpretation, but if you want to get closer to the facts you really should be in the library, not the movie theatre. The story of Valerie Solanas is especially vexing in this case, because were this a work of complete fiction, the script would never have been made. The 'so what?' factor is superseded by the fact that this actually happened, and the legacy of Solanas still divides contemporary feminists.
As cinema, the film succeeds through the charisma exuded in Taylor's performance. Her descent into madness is sudden, vicious and uncompromising. The depiction of the shooting, the moment the film has been leading up to, shows a human being divorced absolutely from her conscience. The groovy scene around Warhol's the Factory is both decadent and, viewed from the 21st century, slightly twee. The pastiche of Sixties nostalgia is less foregrounded than Solanas's brutal victimhood. The film begins with a reading of her psychiatric evaluation, where a litany of unpunished crimes inflicted upon this woman by various men is laid out. The female director sets her stall out straight away - what you are hearing now leads through a direct line of cause and effect to the monstrous act you will see committed by Solanas later.
If the film has a major flaw, it is the title. Audiences could be mistaken for thinking it is about a documentarian of Warhol's life and work. Solanas and her SCUM manifesto, for better or worse, have made their mark, and perhaps 'Solanas' would have been a more fitting (if less marketable) title. Did it take the shooting for that to be the case? A polemical moment in recent history relayed straightforwardly, this is competent, entertaining, edifying cinema.
Imagine if the situation were reversed and Solanis was a man calling for the cutting up of all women and denouncing women as an inferior race. Such a viewpoint would be considered monstrous! Solanis is a crank and a fool, so it's impossible to take her character's world view any more seriously than the guy down by the subway station who mumbles to people who aren't there.
The entire Factory scene is rightly exposed as the pretentious, ridiculous collection of sub-mediocre talent it was. So the viewer isn't surprised when Solanis shoots Warhol, as he couldn't say no to anyone around him and surrounded himself with so many weirdos it was inevitable.
Would this film have been lauded had it been a biopic of Mark David Chapman? I don't see much difference between Solanis and Chapman frankly...both complete, colossal failures in life who managed to gain notierity through murder or attempted murder.
In summary, this was a well-executed take on a rather idiotic topic. I'd rather see the director use her talents to make a movie about people who deserve the effort. Not worthless no-talents like Warhol and Solanis.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film was originally planned as a documentary, but the filmmakers found almost no footage of Solanas or anyone to speak about her.
- PifiasAn end credit claims that Candy Darling died in 1975; she actually died in 1974.
- Citas
Valerie Solanas: You're a guy? My god, I thought you were a lesbian.
Candy Darling: Thanks, a lot of people say that.
Selecciones populares
- How long is I Shot Andy Warhol?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- I Shot Andy Warhol
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 1.875.527 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 57.053 US$
- 5 may 1996
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 1.875.527 US$
- Duración
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1