Nick es un director de cine que está rodando una película independiente de bajo presupuesto. El problema es que todo lo que puede salir mal, le sale, y lo que es imposible que salga mal, tam... Leer todoNick es un director de cine que está rodando una película independiente de bajo presupuesto. El problema es que todo lo que puede salir mal, le sale, y lo que es imposible que salga mal, también.Nick es un director de cine que está rodando una película independiente de bajo presupuesto. El problema es que todo lo que puede salir mal, le sale, y lo que es imposible que salga mal, también.
- Premios
- 7 premios y 8 nominaciones en total
- Chad Palomino
- (as James LeGros)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDirector Tom DiCillo didn't want to beg people for money to make this film, so he asked his actors if they would work for free. All of them agreed and most of them even put up money themselves. Eventually anybody who contributed a few dollars got a part in the movie.
- PifiasWhen the gaffer talks about his private film project, the script on the bed flips between shots.
- Citas
[Little person Tito is not happy with the dream sequence]
Tito: Why does my character have to be a dwarf?
Nick: He doesn't have to be.
Tito: Then why is he? Is that the only way you can make this a dream, to put a dwarf in it?
Nick: No, Tito, I...
Tito: Have you ever had a dream with a dwarf in it? Do you know anyone who's had a dream with a dwarf in it? No! I don't even have dreams with dwarves in them. The only place I've seen dwarves in dreams is in stupid movies like this! "Oh make it weird, put a dwarf in it!". Everyone will go "Woah, this must be a fuckin' dream, there's a fuckin' dwarf in it!". Well I'm sick of it! You can take this dream sequence and stick it up your ass!
- Créditos adicionalesstatement after the end credits: The characters and incidents portrayed and the names herein are sort of fictitious, and any similarity to the name, character or history of any person is sort of coincidental and unintentional.
Witty and big-hearted satire of the process of making an independent movie. This comes in three parts, each act dealing with a particular scene and bringing a change of emphasis. The story is almost perfectly self-contained, with unity of action, place and time, and the writing and editing keeps it clipping along at a good pace. The writer/director uses the full potential of his set up by bringing in a host of characters and a range of technical aspects of the shoot, and yet wraps it up nicely through the romantic concerns of his creations.
Performances are good all round, and some real insights are delivered - the objection to dwarfs in dream sequences, the most self-obsessed person in the room coming up with the best idea (the blocking for the "admired from afar" scene). It's not a laugh a minute, but there are plenty of good moments.
The only time I noticed the music was when the director was giving a pep talk to one of the actors. Maybe there could have been more jokes on that "score" - or maybe I missed them.
Overall: Not a classic, but thoroughly enjoyable.
- begob
- 16 ago 2017
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
- How long is Living in Oblivion?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 500.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 1.111.790 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 47.965 US$
- 16 jul 1995
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 1.111.790 US$
- Duración1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1