PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,1/10
79 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un mercenario sin piedad renuncia a la violencia cuando descubre que su alma se dirige al infierno. Intenta redimirse cuando una joven es secuestrada y su familia asesinada por un hechicero.Un mercenario sin piedad renuncia a la violencia cuando descubre que su alma se dirige al infierno. Intenta redimirse cuando una joven es secuestrada y su familia asesinada por un hechicero.Un mercenario sin piedad renuncia a la violencia cuando descubre que su alma se dirige al infierno. Intenta redimirse cuando una joven es secuestrada y su familia asesinada por un hechicero.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio y 1 nominación en total
Candice Ivy
- Lieutenant Malthus
- (as Christian Michael Dunkley Clark)
Samuel Roukin
- Marcus Kane
- (as Sam Roukin)
- …
Reseñas destacadas
For me this came out of nowhere. I wasn't expecting much but was absolutely delighted by just how good Solomon Kane was.
Great acting, again a surprise, dazzling special effects and a story that was enjoyable to follow.
Good film fun :)
Great acting, again a surprise, dazzling special effects and a story that was enjoyable to follow.
Good film fun :)
in my book there are 3 classes of fantasy.
high, full of goblins elves and knights in shining amour.
low, a fantasy world without all the classical elements no elves no fairies no blazing swords,
and dark, born from madman's nightmares and populated with them dark place dark worlds and a serious take on the genre.
Kane falls into the latter,
for a low budget film its certainly well done, the character is fairly close to the story's, the props and costumes are reasonably accurate.
the fighting direction is also true to the character no frivolous swashbuckling here lethal moves to great effect.
Kane was not some marvelesque hero wasting motion and energy in his strikes, as one character in a story put it "he is the most lethal swordsmen I've ever seen". (paraphrased).
some parts of it could have been handled better the ending or a slight tightening up of the exposition parts, but all in all well worth watching.
is it worth seeing yes. but bear in mind this is not a lord of the rings style film, nor is this die hard 1600.
there is a lot of dialog and a lot of religious references. this is a dark fantasy film with a touch of horror, aiming to reveal Kane's hitherto unknown origins.
if you like to support good independent films go see it if all your interested in is mindless action..... do what you will.
high, full of goblins elves and knights in shining amour.
low, a fantasy world without all the classical elements no elves no fairies no blazing swords,
and dark, born from madman's nightmares and populated with them dark place dark worlds and a serious take on the genre.
Kane falls into the latter,
for a low budget film its certainly well done, the character is fairly close to the story's, the props and costumes are reasonably accurate.
the fighting direction is also true to the character no frivolous swashbuckling here lethal moves to great effect.
Kane was not some marvelesque hero wasting motion and energy in his strikes, as one character in a story put it "he is the most lethal swordsmen I've ever seen". (paraphrased).
some parts of it could have been handled better the ending or a slight tightening up of the exposition parts, but all in all well worth watching.
is it worth seeing yes. but bear in mind this is not a lord of the rings style film, nor is this die hard 1600.
there is a lot of dialog and a lot of religious references. this is a dark fantasy film with a touch of horror, aiming to reveal Kane's hitherto unknown origins.
if you like to support good independent films go see it if all your interested in is mindless action..... do what you will.
Solomon Kane I'll start by pointing out that in no way is SK a copy of Van Helsing, the media and certain unaware people have been comparing the two just due to the characters clothing resemblance like the big hat, well Solomon Kane has been wearing the big hat since he was created in 1928 as stories written in weird tales, where as the 2004 movie van helsing was the first time the character had been portrayed wearing the big hat and being a monster hunter rather than just the killer of count Dracula, if anything the 04 VH movie copied Solomon Kane, anyway moving on to the review:
I was excited about seeing this since i'm a big movie fan and enjoy reading books i was waiting with anticipation for the release, the movie started strong with a impressive fight sequence and good special effects,there was none of the shaky camera action scenes which i find ruin any action movie when you can't see whats happening, everything from the props to visuals made it a very dark and almost creepy atmosphere, although i would class it as a action/fantasy there was elements of horror thrown in too, during the middle of the film the action slows for a while but that just gave me time to appreciate the performance given by James purefoy, other than resident evil i'd never really seen him in anything but i will defend his performance as Solomon Kane since i don't think anyone else could have played the part as confidently as him, supporting cast wise they mostly perform well.
There was a few continuity issues with the fact that Solomon never seemed to run out of single shot pistols and even if he'd thrown one at someone or something he always had both a sword and dagger but along with a few other things i must say that i did enjoy watching this and if you're a fan of the genre then i recommend a watch.
over all i give Solomon Kane 7 out of 10
I was excited about seeing this since i'm a big movie fan and enjoy reading books i was waiting with anticipation for the release, the movie started strong with a impressive fight sequence and good special effects,there was none of the shaky camera action scenes which i find ruin any action movie when you can't see whats happening, everything from the props to visuals made it a very dark and almost creepy atmosphere, although i would class it as a action/fantasy there was elements of horror thrown in too, during the middle of the film the action slows for a while but that just gave me time to appreciate the performance given by James purefoy, other than resident evil i'd never really seen him in anything but i will defend his performance as Solomon Kane since i don't think anyone else could have played the part as confidently as him, supporting cast wise they mostly perform well.
There was a few continuity issues with the fact that Solomon never seemed to run out of single shot pistols and even if he'd thrown one at someone or something he always had both a sword and dagger but along with a few other things i must say that i did enjoy watching this and if you're a fan of the genre then i recommend a watch.
over all i give Solomon Kane 7 out of 10
If you took the time to find it, then you wont be disappointed with this solid, old fashioned sword and sorcery movie.
The tales of Solomon Kane have been around longer than most, the character first appearing in mass market print back in the late twenties, but they've not been filmed. Many others, borrowing from it have been filmed so you will be quite familiar with the twists and turns having seen them elsewhere. The saving grace here is that it's all done quite well. James Purefoy is every part the tortured warrior and it's good to see Max Von Sydow and the legend that is Pete Poslethwaite up on the big screen. It's a creepy, dark movie at times and the extra effort they've put into the set design and cinematography really helps to set the scene. The story nips along to a satisfying conclusion. The fight choreography is very well done and FX are good as well.
The tales of Solomon Kane have been around longer than most, the character first appearing in mass market print back in the late twenties, but they've not been filmed. Many others, borrowing from it have been filmed so you will be quite familiar with the twists and turns having seen them elsewhere. The saving grace here is that it's all done quite well. James Purefoy is every part the tortured warrior and it's good to see Max Von Sydow and the legend that is Pete Poslethwaite up on the big screen. It's a creepy, dark movie at times and the extra effort they've put into the set design and cinematography really helps to set the scene. The story nips along to a satisfying conclusion. The fight choreography is very well done and FX are good as well.
a character. with a coherent story who reflects his transformation. fragments of a form of Middle Age - social aspects, people, sufferance. a vulnerable hero. fantasy. and fight scenes who are parts not axis for film. for the fans of genre or for simple viewer, Solomon Kane is different by many other films from the same genre of the last decade. because the story is not a pretext for the statue of the lead character. because the black and white are mixed in inspired manner to give a fantasy precise dose of realism. because the historical references - the Dutch costume of Solomon Kane , first - are good points for a seductive story about a mission and about noble duty. so, an interesting film.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesTo prepare for the role of Solomon Kane, James Purefoy read the entire oeuvre of Robert E. Howard as well as researching extensively the lifestyle and attitudes of Puritans.
- Pifias(at around 1 min) In the film, ships are shown flying the British Union Jack flag with the caption "North Africa: 1600". However, the first variant of the Union Jack (the one shown) wasn't used until 1606, with the current version of the flag not seen until 1801.
- Citas
Solomon Kane: If I kill you, I am bound for hell. It is a price I shall gladly pay.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Chiến Binh Thế Kỷ
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 45.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 19.652.185 US$
- Duración
- 1h 44min(104 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta