PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,4/10
2,5 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una secuela de la exitosa película británica.Una secuela de la exitosa película británica.Una secuela de la exitosa película británica.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
I wasn't the biggest fan of the first movie, watchable but boring... Maybe a 4 or 5 out of 10; but my partner liked it and there wasn't much to choose from at the cinema this weekend so I reluctantly agreed to go with him. I entered the theatre with low expectations...
Boy was I pleasantly surprised! Yes, it's not blockbuster movie, nor worthy of an Oscar (most Oscar winners are overrated guff anyway) and a couple of the supporting cast members are very poor in regards to their acting talent.
BUUUTTTT overall it's enjoyable, heart warming and you leave with a smile on your face.
Worth a watch for sure, and believable or not, it is actually a true story.
Boy was I pleasantly surprised! Yes, it's not blockbuster movie, nor worthy of an Oscar (most Oscar winners are overrated guff anyway) and a couple of the supporting cast members are very poor in regards to their acting talent.
BUUUTTTT overall it's enjoyable, heart warming and you leave with a smile on your face.
Worth a watch for sure, and believable or not, it is actually a true story.
I loved the first one, I'm 35 and it's not my genre of music or movie but I loved it, was one of the last I watched with my uncle before he passed.
I think either people are desperate to point score or it was written in to every contract for British film and tv that they have to acknowledge all this PC rubbish of this generation who want change without any work or changing themselves to be better people. It was so unnecessary in so many ways, I heard audible groans in the audience, people are so sick of it. It's creating a theme of good people hating on something that should be good, anyway it added to nothing and took some of the magic away.
The storyline was pointless really, they've aged a bit and now the guy thinks they're past it so won't give them a new deal, there's acknowledgment of a death In the group and a forced love angle where the couple had no chemistry. Plus an angle where a fisherman hates a farmer because I guess that's a thing. There was no magic, no natural innocence or excitement , it felt unnecessary, uninteresting and uninspired.
The thing is now there's so many remakes, sequels or spin offs I'm not sure the film industry can actually make as many top tier films.
The acting was alright, pretty bland, bar 2 or 3 the names you won't remember, some don't even speak! The Glastonbury stuff was awfully filmed and executed. Then there's the last song, dear god I just felt ashamed thinking of some group of imbeciles sitting patting themselves on the back for calling the final song "union of different colours" even though they sing the lyric as "kinds"
I don't understand why they think forcing it into everything will fix the ignorant, they're a bad kinda people who won't be taught easily.
The film lacked what made the first a solid 8.5/9. Music was good, that's the only thing stopping it from going to a 2.
I think either people are desperate to point score or it was written in to every contract for British film and tv that they have to acknowledge all this PC rubbish of this generation who want change without any work or changing themselves to be better people. It was so unnecessary in so many ways, I heard audible groans in the audience, people are so sick of it. It's creating a theme of good people hating on something that should be good, anyway it added to nothing and took some of the magic away.
The storyline was pointless really, they've aged a bit and now the guy thinks they're past it so won't give them a new deal, there's acknowledgment of a death In the group and a forced love angle where the couple had no chemistry. Plus an angle where a fisherman hates a farmer because I guess that's a thing. There was no magic, no natural innocence or excitement , it felt unnecessary, uninteresting and uninspired.
The thing is now there's so many remakes, sequels or spin offs I'm not sure the film industry can actually make as many top tier films.
The acting was alright, pretty bland, bar 2 or 3 the names you won't remember, some don't even speak! The Glastonbury stuff was awfully filmed and executed. Then there's the last song, dear god I just felt ashamed thinking of some group of imbeciles sitting patting themselves on the back for calling the final song "union of different colours" even though they sing the lyric as "kinds"
I don't understand why they think forcing it into everything will fix the ignorant, they're a bad kinda people who won't be taught easily.
The film lacked what made the first a solid 8.5/9. Music was good, that's the only thing stopping it from going to a 2.
I think this film knows it's audience and caters to them well. It is almost like comfort food in a movie.
It's just a bit of a shame the script wasn't a bit better. Everything is just so predictable throughout the film and there seem to be plenty of storylines that don't really go anywhere.
It's just a bit of a shame the script wasn't a bit better. Everything is just so predictable throughout the film and there seem to be plenty of storylines that don't really go anywhere.
I really enjoyed the first movie and though this one was as good maybe a even better . The main characters were excellent and you really felt a good connection to them and story , a good mixture of fun , tears and feel good . A great watch.
As with most new to the shelf productions this one is no different and has to contain whatever the current social engineering is.
The funny thing is that they were banging on about all the old band mates not being politically correct enough, and breaching women's rights by stereotyping them, when all along this movie is stereotyping Cornish people so it's a bit rich!
Apart from that it was barely watchable, with a cameo by Chris Evans and cringe-worthy scenes from the Island Records bash and main stage at Glasto.. I wouldn't recommend this film to anybody who cares anything about Cornwall or sea shanties!
The funny thing is that they were banging on about all the old band mates not being politically correct enough, and breaching women's rights by stereotyping them, when all along this movie is stereotyping Cornish people so it's a bit rich!
Apart from that it was barely watchable, with a cameo by Chris Evans and cringe-worthy scenes from the Island Records bash and main stage at Glasto.. I wouldn't recommend this film to anybody who cares anything about Cornwall or sea shanties!
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe sea shanty song ''Bound for South Australia'' was heard in the original 'Fisherman's Friends' (2019) film which was set and filmed in Port Isaac in Cornwall, England. The Yorke Peninsula in South Australia has a strong Cornish lineage and has strong connections with Cornwall through its Cornish culture, legacy and heritage.
- Créditos adicionalesDuring the end credits, scenes of the real Fisherman's Friends are shown in their van on the way to Glastonbury Festival to sing.
- ConexionesFollows Música a bordo (2019)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Fisherman's Friends: One and All?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Fisherman's Friends 2
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Port Isaac, Cornwall, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(The village and harbour where most of film is based)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 4.788.511 US$
- Duración
- 1h 51min(111 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta