San Andreas mega seísmo

The "actors" really stand the Premiere of this peace of trash². My son and daughter want to see it.... after 20minutes they begged me to switch it off. So this is my rating for the first 22minutes. And really there is no funny thing in this disaster of a film.

What level of production was this? P or L? I believe it's simply not worth time for writing nor reading much about all of the (negative) aspects of this title. But I'll put down the most obvious and eye hurting ones: story line (boring and predictive), "spec. effects" (repetitious and legging decades - effect of low budget for sure), acting (for most of the characters), realism (now, that's "the big one"!), camera and editing (both of the latter are director's and editor's faults, for scenes were wrongly shot, chosen and put), so forth so on. Seriously hurting... I believe the review title says it all. I can't find the motives for filming this reasonable enough, beside some seriously suspicious ones like time wasting. Finally, maybe the only good thing is the subject that should and could have been approached super-seriously (after many attempts, from which this is the very worst I've seen). And for those who logically ask why I watched it (and wrote this): 'cause I'm interested in the topic of Popular Catastrophism.

This is a D-Movie, really weak - not recommendable!

This movie is so horrible that it made me chuckle multiple times. The Tom Cruise clone was probably the best actor but that's not saying much. Overall I would've given it a 1 but it made me laugh.

Also the blond chick smiles too much.

When a siren goes off with a red flashing light, someone says "what's that?" and the reply is "an alarm" it doesn't bode well for the rest of the film. Sadly not even in the 'so bad it's good' category.