Why?

For a film with at least some of the cast you might actually of heard of this is a very forgettable flick writing this review 10 minutes after watching it and can't remember a single characters name! Nowhere near a 10 rating but watchable on a free stream!

So bad its a joke i would give this a miss.

Bad acting all the way.

What is Lance Henriksen doing these days taking bit parts in ordure like this?

Every movie he seems to star in is of the utterly worst quality and it is not as if he is not still a great actor but the other reviewers are entirely correct, I should have paid attention.

Acting is not that bad but it is a realllllllyyyyyy boring stalk and slash with no story whatsoever or even a single interesting kill!

Very poor 2 hatchets on my horror scale!

It's a bad movie.

Even if we consider that it is an indie, low budget movie, that is not enough to justify the bad quality of the story or the terrible (terrible, terrible) acting. I can forgive the bad effects, but that's it.

Also, it's not scary at all. It's predictable, boring... not even in a funny way.

The only good comments must be from someone related to the actors or director or such.

It's good that it's short... so you didn't waste a lot of time in it.

Before I watch any flick (or movie, using the latter term for what is worth watching) I check IMDB scores, looking carefully at the lowest scores as they are usually the most honest. Here we have a lot of 10's and high praises associated with those, all given in one month...these are clearly an the result of a pity party attempting to pump up the score for this atrocity. Go with the lowest scores; those are the honest ones. If it weren't for the fake 10's I might have given this a generous "3" but the pathetic attempt to deceive the audience made me drop the score to a "1".