Mumbai Saga

This movie is kind of an absolute nonsense. I mean why it was needed even? Already we have 4 films like that why this one and that to bad one? Acting looks quite impressive but the storyline, the set is bad.

Generic Premise. Same old Mumbai Gangster movie that we have watched a million times before. The script is not coherent and the edits are scrappy. The acting from John is a bit over the top. Prateik Babbar is ok and has performed decently but the hairstyle and look chosen for him makes him look funny. . Rohit Roy does a brilliant job with his expressions but the hairstyle, make up and costumes make him look like a buffoon. Gone is the era for such gangster movies.

Bollywood is losing its value with movies like this. Bad sound mixing, the colour grading is unpleasant. Overdramatic shots with bad action scenes. The story is extremely copied from other movies. The script and sceeenplay is terrible. The only reason someone should watch it is because they have run out of movies to watch. 3/10 for the starcast and car stunts.

Overall good movie..... It's nice to watch.... But Daya Nayak and Bala saheeb are somehow wrongly described

Motive is understood as the reason or story behind the commission of an offence. Amartya (John Abraham) meets Murali (Suneil Shetty) only to learn the way to rule Mumbai. The meeting and subsequent killings clarify what Amartya's motive is, also it artistically portrays how regional gangsters work by forming the intention to kill (mens rea) at the spur of the moment.

The film takes an adrenaline rushing turn, when Inspector Vijay Savarkar (Emraan Hashmi) interferes to accost Amartya only as per a diktat- clearly portraying the constant rustle between duties and orders. Finally, the juxtaposing of illegality and government power is sincerely weaved towards the end of the film.