Añade un argumento en tu idiomaClip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.Clip show featuring remarkable, terrifying and unexplained camera footage. With first-hand accounts from those who captured the images and analysis from experts.
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
This show depends on totally ignorant people. Simple physics could explain 70% of the so-called "unexplained". How on earth are people this stupid now? You have two guys running around with a tape recorder and a camera. One guys say "oh! I think I just saw something" but there is no recording or photo. So? I'm supposed to believe these guys? No!! Just cancel this garbage.
The Parapsychologist who likes to find even the most obscure possibility, as a debunk for phenomena, especially repeative phenomena, is simply in denial. One example he used to white wash all Orbs is that the only happen on digital format cameras. That isn't true first of all, I've seen many orb photos on film except the exposures are usually longer and one would see trails instead. Even if it were true, different formats see different ranges or types of phenomena, even instruments in the same venue. For example, an AM radio won't de-modulate a FM signal or vice-versa, and there are many examples of what a particular device can "see". He as a self proclaimed scientist should know that. I use multiple instruments, not because any of them are ineffective, but because they all have limits to what they are designed to sense.
In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.
In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.
Susan Slaughter does not add anything to the show and sometimes says what I think distracts. She does not appear to be experienced and yet is allowed to discuss issues about which she appears to know nothing about.
I caught this about a couple years after I'd been watching "Paranormal Caught On Camera". What I like is their clips are longer than on PCOC. Not sure why the other show trims them, and also less blurry, which PCOC does on purpose. The show has interesting clips, some that have never made it on PCOC.
Does anyone know where the headless woman in a dress walking in the intro credits come from? I have yet to see that clip presented! It looks like a fake, a video-shop, perhaps from the Philippines.
I have a strong aversion to the British accents (all of them!) and I find them grating on my nerves like fingernails on a blackboard. (I can say this, because everyone else thinks they're fine!) They have way too many hosts talking with a British accent. It sounds pretentious. Me, I have to mute them whenever they talk like that, it physically hurts me, it's that bad.
Sandy Ladkar is a breath of fresh air in comparison. She has a lovely French accent and she brings a touch of French class to the show. She has a genuine perspective, she's not reaching to make herself sound interesting, she's simply speaking her honest opinion. She is very well dressed, but not overtly so: the Parisian casual chic, which is classy, subdued, discreet and doesn't overpower anyone else. I wonder if she broadcasts on Zoom from her town of Angers or if she was filming in USA?
I looked her up and she has a witchy boutique in France and has published several books on her experiences with the paranormal. She deserves her own show, or to spend more time oncamera here. (How does an unmarried French woman end up with an Indian name like "Ladkar"?)
I wish they would bring Sandy Ladkar to PCOC, she's sorely needed there. (Maybe get rid of Rachel Evans?) It seems that Susan Slaughter copied her entire look, that was funny, but she improved considerably on her former incarnation. They both look great actually.
Just wish they would make more of these. Tired of the marathon repeats with no new shows in sight. Come on: in 2022, with everyone having cameras and a lot of people having experiences, they should submit stuff fast. I did but it never made either show.
Please get rid of Joy Harris (I think that's her name) the dark redhead with long hair wearing black. Her voice and accent are horrible, can't stand them!
If you've never had paranormal stuff in your life, you'll scoff at this. Those of us who know, it's addictive as we want to find out more about what happened to us. A solid 9/10 from me.
Does anyone know where the headless woman in a dress walking in the intro credits come from? I have yet to see that clip presented! It looks like a fake, a video-shop, perhaps from the Philippines.
I have a strong aversion to the British accents (all of them!) and I find them grating on my nerves like fingernails on a blackboard. (I can say this, because everyone else thinks they're fine!) They have way too many hosts talking with a British accent. It sounds pretentious. Me, I have to mute them whenever they talk like that, it physically hurts me, it's that bad.
Sandy Ladkar is a breath of fresh air in comparison. She has a lovely French accent and she brings a touch of French class to the show. She has a genuine perspective, she's not reaching to make herself sound interesting, she's simply speaking her honest opinion. She is very well dressed, but not overtly so: the Parisian casual chic, which is classy, subdued, discreet and doesn't overpower anyone else. I wonder if she broadcasts on Zoom from her town of Angers or if she was filming in USA?
I looked her up and she has a witchy boutique in France and has published several books on her experiences with the paranormal. She deserves her own show, or to spend more time oncamera here. (How does an unmarried French woman end up with an Indian name like "Ladkar"?)
I wish they would bring Sandy Ladkar to PCOC, she's sorely needed there. (Maybe get rid of Rachel Evans?) It seems that Susan Slaughter copied her entire look, that was funny, but she improved considerably on her former incarnation. They both look great actually.
Just wish they would make more of these. Tired of the marathon repeats with no new shows in sight. Come on: in 2022, with everyone having cameras and a lot of people having experiences, they should submit stuff fast. I did but it never made either show.
Please get rid of Joy Harris (I think that's her name) the dark redhead with long hair wearing black. Her voice and accent are horrible, can't stand them!
If you've never had paranormal stuff in your life, you'll scoff at this. Those of us who know, it's addictive as we want to find out more about what happened to us. A solid 9/10 from me.
So, this is a great place to view some decently done fakes. There are a couple that might be genuine. They even have a skeptical analyst to make you think these are being critically assessed. Most are easy to spot how they were faked. Where I called it quits was in season 3, where they have the vids from this Hispanic guy named Frank at a hotel room. There is a part where he is in front of the mirror and a towel on the sink counter gets pulled off. Very obviously there is a string on the towel attached to his hand that is just outside of view. You can SEE IT! All these analysts that have been semi credible are excusing his giggles and saying how it's such a great example of paranormal caught on film. GAG. I know these are all junk shows, but some part of me always hopes to see something credible. Not on this crappy show folks. Keep looking.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesShows way more footage than Testigos de lo paranormal (2019). For example, in UFOs in the Forest, Sightings by the Sea and Demon in a Box (2021), the Canada man being pursued by his box of "Canneberges" cereal shows way more instances of the box moving on the kitchen counter towards him, whereas PCOC only showed the final instance, and repeated that over and over again. (Audiences have counted over a dozen times for a clip to be repeated on that show, while their "experts" comment.) Also, this show doesn't seem to blur audience-submitted paranormal videos beyond 80p, which is the norm at PCOC, their 'sister' show.
- PifiasIn one segment, they showed a woman afflicted with some sort of psychopathy, possibly dementia praecox, and who decided to marry her life-size zombie doll in her backyard. This had absolutely nothing unexplained whatsoever and nothing paranormal. This show isn't about pathology yet it went on interviewing the woman with an abnormal fixation for one of her dolls. (This rather belonged on TLC, right along with the hoarders' shows.)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Unexplained: Caught on Camera have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta