Cuando el cuerpo de un hombre es descubierto en un estanque, su esposa se ve envuelta en un complejo juicio, lo que hace que la podcaster Alex y el equipo del Chronicle busquen respuestas en... Leer todoCuando el cuerpo de un hombre es descubierto en un estanque, su esposa se ve envuelta en un complejo juicio, lo que hace que la podcaster Alex y el equipo del Chronicle busquen respuestas en torno al inusual caso.Cuando el cuerpo de un hombre es descubierto en un estanque, su esposa se ve envuelta en un complejo juicio, lo que hace que la podcaster Alex y el equipo del Chronicle busquen respuestas en torno al inusual caso.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
David Parent
- Bailiff
- (as David Patrick Parent)
Reseñas destacadas
6/10 - still not the best, but a noteworthy upswing in the Chronicle Mysteries series
Like another reviewer, I wish Drew would pick up the pace a bit with Alex. The shy looks between them belong more to his daughter and prospective beau than to these two. Who are the ones in high school?
I agree with a different reviewer that going to trial with this woman was ridiculous. No DA would proceed with zero evidence beyond a contentious divorce and the prosecutor would have to provide what was known about time of death as one of the first things. So there would have been no reason for the neighbor's wife to be questioned such that she reveals that the accused returned later that night. And where was Alex in the weeks or even months (sometimes years) leading up to the trial? But a TV court drama has to go down to the wire so that the heroine walks into court and gives the defense what she needs minutes before time runs out. I was surprised that the writers did acknowledge the problem with introducing evidence without advising the prosecutor in advance. Even so, the defense attorney didn't follow proper procedure and should have know better. She says something that acknowledges that she's aware of the other suspects, so she also should have had to be notifying the prosecutor of that evidence as they uncovered it. The chaos that follows her last minute questions also should never have happened. That lawyer strikes me as not very good. And why wasn't the key page of "the book" saved into evidence rather than having to rely on a video of it? Failure to preserve evidence is a big no-no and that page definitely should have raised red flags.
The detective work was decent. Our heroes weren't even threatened by the police for interfering as in so many of these shows. I had no idea who did it.
Alex's mom and Drew's daughter provided small but interesting side stories.
As a whole, the movie wasn't a waste of time, but also not one of the better entries in this franchise. If the writers had tightened up some of the flaws in court procedure, it would have been less distracting.
I agree with a different reviewer that going to trial with this woman was ridiculous. No DA would proceed with zero evidence beyond a contentious divorce and the prosecutor would have to provide what was known about time of death as one of the first things. So there would have been no reason for the neighbor's wife to be questioned such that she reveals that the accused returned later that night. And where was Alex in the weeks or even months (sometimes years) leading up to the trial? But a TV court drama has to go down to the wire so that the heroine walks into court and gives the defense what she needs minutes before time runs out. I was surprised that the writers did acknowledge the problem with introducing evidence without advising the prosecutor in advance. Even so, the defense attorney didn't follow proper procedure and should have know better. She says something that acknowledges that she's aware of the other suspects, so she also should have had to be notifying the prosecutor of that evidence as they uncovered it. The chaos that follows her last minute questions also should never have happened. That lawyer strikes me as not very good. And why wasn't the key page of "the book" saved into evidence rather than having to rely on a video of it? Failure to preserve evidence is a big no-no and that page definitely should have raised red flags.
The detective work was decent. Our heroes weren't even threatened by the police for interfering as in so many of these shows. I had no idea who did it.
Alex's mom and Drew's daughter provided small but interesting side stories.
As a whole, the movie wasn't a waste of time, but also not one of the better entries in this franchise. If the writers had tightened up some of the flaws in court procedure, it would have been less distracting.
A TV murder mystery it may be but it leaves little to being an intriguing thriller of any sorts. I know it is just another cookie cutter story line made for TV but I just hate when I invest 90 minutes of my TV viewing time only to be disappointed in a dumb ending in how this particular murder mystery gets solved. They throw in a little romance between the two main characters as well.
No need for a spoiler alert because the spoiler is this entire made for TV murder mystery.
I give it a so-so 5 out of 10 IMDB rating.
No need for a spoiler alert because the spoiler is this entire made for TV murder mystery.
I give it a so-so 5 out of 10 IMDB rating.
Another Hallmark movie about Philadelphia...filmed in British Columbia, Canada. 😡
This was probably my favorite entry in the Chronicle Mysteries so far, but Aurora Teagarden, Hannah Swenson, and Mystery 101 continue to be my favorite mysteries series on Hallmark.
I do like the two lead actors and I appreciated the team of helpers they have circling around them. The pod cast is an interesting and modern touch. My least favorite part is the awkward re-enactments which seem a staple on the chronicle mystery series.
I am not sure if they are trying to build a live interest or not...but if they are this must be the slowest burn on the planet, because I am not feeling anything yet.
Also they are still toying with her staying or unpacking her boxes...I can see why the potential love interest is such a slow burn!?!?
For me these are still on the watch and delete list.
I do like the two lead actors and I appreciated the team of helpers they have circling around them. The pod cast is an interesting and modern touch. My least favorite part is the awkward re-enactments which seem a staple on the chronicle mystery series.
I am not sure if they are trying to build a live interest or not...but if they are this must be the slowest burn on the planet, because I am not feeling anything yet.
Also they are still toying with her staying or unpacking her boxes...I can see why the potential love interest is such a slow burn!?!?
For me these are still on the watch and delete list.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThis is the first of the "Chronicle Mysteries" series of movies in which Tegan Moss has a credited role. However, her photograph appeared in Los misterios del Chronicle: El hombre equivocado (2019) as Tara Thurman, the twin sister of Tim Reynolds, portrayed by Tegan's real life older brother, Jesse Moss.
- PifiasAround 29 minutes in when Alex is talking to Mrs. Burke at the golf course the sleeves of her draped over the shoulder sweater change in the way they are tied from shot to shot.
- ConexionesFollows Los misterios del Chronicle: Se busca (2019)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Хроники тайн: Глубокий омут
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- 9360 Mill St, Chilliwack, Columbia Británica, Canadá(Harrington Chronicle building exterior)
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta