Añade un argumento en tu idiomaTwo college friends take a journey home. One of them makes a mistake that may tear a family apart. Sometimes there are no second chances, sometimes there are no mulligans.Two college friends take a journey home. One of them makes a mistake that may tear a family apart. Sometimes there are no second chances, sometimes there are no mulligans.Two college friends take a journey home. One of them makes a mistake that may tear a family apart. Sometimes there are no second chances, sometimes there are no mulligans.
- Director/a
- Guionista
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 4 premios y 2 nominaciones en total
- Tyler Davidson
- (as Derek James)
- Gramma
- (as Anne Chaland)
- Marty
- (as Tom Orr-Loney)
- Jackie
- (as KimberleyClarke)
- Jim
- (as Ken Mayes)
- Erin
- (as McKenzie Ryan)
- Director/a
- Guionista
- Todo el reparto y equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Reseñas destacadas
Jumpy storytelling without logic
The biggest problem with this film, as I see it, is that even though (most of the time) I understand what it is that the filmmaker aim for - it's just very poorly executed. There isn't enough flesh on the bones for things to make sense. It's as if whoever wrote the script knows WHAT the characters need to do, but not WHY. For example, in one of the early scenes, the son of the family makes a big song and dance about how his friend should cover up when he's drying off after a swim. A few scenes later (after the friend has come out to him), the son questions why the friend is covering up (after a shower) when he's normally not shy. Rather than saying, "Because you told me to in no uncertain terms," it turns into an argument about whether the friend's coming out has changed things between them. And this is exactly my problem with this film: even though I understand why they argue and I think the question of what changes when someone comes out is valid, it's as if the filmmaker had to rush to explicitly make that point rather than allowing the audience to see for itself.
In this respect, the film is shallow. I don't see that whoever wrote it actually understands what the characters go through and why they act the way they do.
If you're not bothered about what motivates characters, then you might still get some enjoyment out of this film.
A story worth telling!
Interesting Premise
Does it succeed on its own as a gripping and well-produced story? Yes and no. There are problems with continuity from scene to scene and timing in general that interfere with the viewer's ability to stay on course by way of identifying with the main characters, in spite of generally excellent acting in the separate episodes comprising a more or less believable plot.
I liked the casting with the single exception of the writer's inclusion of himself as Chase Rousseau -- somewhat long in the tooth for a college kid. He was also quite wooden (no pun) in scenes with both the buddy and the dad.
How does it all end? How do stories of this kind usually end? To the extent that this one prepares the viewer for a unique catharsis the answer to that question will be revealed and the viewer will be satisfied. A solid seven of ten in my book.
Worst casting ever
Totally predictable but good
The story was totally predictable from beginning to end. I was always one step ahead. Also there's a little sister (Grace Viskovic) who's too cute and intelligent for anyone her age. Still I loved this. It was written by David (who is openly gay himself) and he perfectly caught the feelings and emotions of a gay man coming out to his friends. The acting is exceptional. David, Gill and Baynham are all good but Payne is just great. He has a very hard role to play and he pulls it off. Also the movie just looks gorgeous. They shot it in a small town in Canada and the scenery was just breath-taking. Also there's a few very hot man on man kissing scenes! So it is totally predictable but beautifully done and acted. I give it an 8.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesCharlie David is actually a left-handed golfer but golfed right for the film to appear to be a bad golfer.
- PifiasWhen the boys were painting the fence, when one of them was painting the middle of the fence, it kept quavering, as if it was made out of balsa wood. No fence would have been made of that type of wood.
- Citas
Tyler Davidson: I love you, man, you know, like... like a brother... Not, like, you know...
Chase Rousseau: Yeah, I know. No sword fights.
Tyler Davidson: Right.
Chase Rousseau: I love you, too.
Tyler Davidson: Maybe we can find a more macho way of saying it. You know, something a little more manly.
Chase Rousseau: Go Steelers?
Tyler Davidson: Yeah. Go Steelers is good. I like that. I love that. Let's use that from now on. Go Steelers. Wow, I never said "I love you" to a guy before.
Chase Rousseau: Yeah, me, neither.
Tyler Davidson: Good talk.
- Créditos adicionalesThere's a quick scene after the credits.
Selecciones populares
- How long is Mulligans?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Mul.li.gans
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 800.000 CAD (estimación)
- Duración
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1






