A Day of Violence

I dont understand the pitiful 1 star review? I'm no professional film critic and I either like or dislike films without it changing my life.

Darrens films are a low budget gore fest based on his passion for the genre including Italian 70s style film making.

When you have such a small budget and limited access to seasoned professionals you can only work with what you get.

The guys do a good job for their ability and I didnt expect anything else.

Watching sudden fury from 1998 in 2020 does look a bit dated and the acting was a bit ropey back then.

ADOV Is a much better quality picture with newer tech and the acting is a lot better.

Darren's films are no worse than the Rise of the foot soldier style franchise which use more seasoned pros and a bigger budget and I find them watchable even if the so called critics dont.

I enjoyed Blair witch 1st time round too not knowing was fake ;-)

People who watch Darren's 3 films need to appreciate what he is trying to achieve and respect the efforts of someone realising his dream and has something to be proud of.

Mitchell (Nick Rendell) is a hard man debt collector who thinks he's hit it big time when he stumbles across £100,000 while collecting a debt from addled drug dealer Hopper (Italian horror veteran Giovanni Lombardo Radice)

However, it turns out that the money belongs to his new boss, gangster Curtis Boswell (victor D Thorn) who promptly sends Mitchell to find his loot. So begins a nightmare for Mitchell, who must stay one step ahead of his crime colleagues if he wants to stay alive...

A Day Of Violence is nothing special trash, and I've no problem with trash per se- as long as it's entertaining, but unfortunately, it isn't. Shot on video, it has unconvincing performances from Victor Thorn as the rather well spoken crime boss, as well as clichéd hard men in black suits spouting pretty woeful dialogue. It has one or two nice gore scenes and director Darren Ward's heart is in the right place, as the film is nicely exploitative. It just isn't very good, and you won't really care what happens to the characters anyway.

A Highly disappointing and mediocre film, it's probably best watched drunk, or else not watched at all, because nobody's missing anything here at all.

There is nothing good to say about this movie. It's another pointless, pitiful and deeply unpleasant movie by Darren Ward. He has been making this type of thing for years and he hasn't improved since the truly awful Sudden Fury many years ago.

Its very very cheap. Production values are poor. The lighting is at times to dark to see what is going on and the sound makes it impossible to hear what is being said. However given the terrible level of acting and writing and directing involved this is probably not much of a loss.

There are some positive reviews here and on other sites which can only be by people connected to the movie as no-one could possibly find this to be a 10/10 movie.

Avoid.

Mitchell Parker lies dead on a morgue slab.

In life, 'Mitchell' served the low ranks of Debt Collectors, surrounded by all the filth and scum that the world had to offer. He thought his luck was in, when on a routine collection he stumbles across 100,000 in cash, hidden in the sofa of one of his clients.

dark and haunting past hangs over the head of 'Mitchell Parker', one that will lead him on a journey of redemption and ultimately sacrifice. Hunted by the gang whose Money he has stolen. He must evade capture and use the money to rid himself of his demons once and for all. Witness his last days of life.

Kind of a bad Brit flick that starts like a porn film. Lots of screaming, but little of interest goes on.

Take it or leave it. I don't think it really delivers.

Hilarious, raucous, hyper 'masculine' non-sense. Made for less than a DVD rental price but, ironically, not worth the price of entry. Credit for making it, less credit for the end product. The most savage, debasing element of this flaccid, severed member is it's understanding of Southampton's geography. Shirley High Street isn't that long.