Un viaje a territorios inexplorados y prohibidos a través de tres historias enredadas en el espacio y el tiempo.Un viaje a territorios inexplorados y prohibidos a través de tres historias enredadas en el espacio y el tiempo.Un viaje a territorios inexplorados y prohibidos a través de tres historias enredadas en el espacio y el tiempo.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
If you're looking for a constant jumpscares fest, this is not for you. Books of Blood delivers a slow burn anthology with decent acting. Some of the stories are a little drawn out and could've done with some trimming. The pacing is where this movie suffers but it is definitely worth watching.
This is a collection of some nice scary stories. I liked the acting in general. Special effects, background music, and sound effects were awesome. In summary, if you are searching for a good quality scary movie, I recommend watching this movie.
Ok let's get this out the way first. The Books of Blood by Barker have never been equalled since publication.
They are also almost impossible to translate into film. Most of their horror derives from an existential terror of something beyond our understanding.
From the grisly horror of "Rawhead Rex" to the sublime "In the Hills, the Cities" all of the separate stories spin us around in search of a tether we never find.
This is a pretty good adaptation of a series of books that defy translation into something as safe as cinema.
There are moments of horror and some dread. I can feel Barker behind it but it just can't reproduce the terrible beauty if the writing. Nothing ever did. Hellraiser was close because Barker was still in that mindset when he directed it.
This is good. The Miles sequence is the most faithful if transposed and altered. But i enjoyed it and just want to read the stories again.
Do yourself a favor. Go find them and read them too. It's quite an experience. Good luck
Nothing new horror wise. However, the first story goes on and on and is not well acted and takes up over half the film. The second story is much better acted and scripted, Anna Friel should have played the lead in the first story as Britt Robertson is not a strong enough actor, but that's the least of the problems. The problem is you need to watch to get the twist at the end and most will give up, I almost did but was too lethargic. As for the story running through well it is there just to link so it is what it is.
In the end, after nothing has really happened you realize you've wasted over an hour and a half for a nice twist but is it really worth it?
NO
This is the first time ive seen mysophonia referenced in a film. Both my husband and i experience it; him with mouth noises and me with water noises, and it was a realistic portrayal of how overwhelming it can be. This anthology was an unexpected find and I'm glad we gave it a go. The actings great, the stories are engaging and varied and it wasn't predictable. I know clive barkers books are visceral and complex and I certainly understand why some fans would feel short changed, but it's worth taking a look
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesBooks of Blood adapts Clive Barker's framing device story from his "Book of Blood" but also includes brand new stories written for this film that Barker was involved in creating.
- PifiasMary says Miles died at 7 years old, but the dates on his gravestone span less than 6 years.
- Banda sonoraDeep Six
Performed by Marilyn Manson
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Books of Blood?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración
- 1h 47min(107 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta