400 Bullets

"One cold winter night in Afghanistan is about to get a whole lot worse for Rana Rae, a Gurkha soldier left to guard a British military outpost, when Captain Noah Brandt arrives looking for refuge from a group of rogue special ops and a cell of heavily armed Taliban. The two soldiers must fight for their lives as they attempt to call for backup before the rogue squad, led by the backstabbing Sergeant Bartlett, can hunt them down to retrieve a case of missile guidance chips that Noah intercepted. But Bartlett and his men do not count on Rana, whose ferocious Gurkha training makes him a force to be reckoned with. " Okay, that is the overview... there is a lack of common sense that derails this plot.

The good guys are fighting the bad guys and they only have 400 bullets. Right... They are in an important advanced outpost with tanks, armored vehicles, humvees and lots of equipment but somehow the only two soldiers left there have no ammo. The action is enough for the four stars. Watch once, and don't look back.

Ok so they only have 400 bullets and start running out of bullets then its down to 1 bullet.

But yet every one they killed was arm to the teeth with hand guns, rifles, bullets yet they just step over the bodys that had weapons and bullets? Lol! At that point i got mad att the movie...

Its not even B action movie, its W for waste of time and Z for zero quality.

Thought i would give this a chance as it had a whole bunch of British actors, boy was I disappointed. Scipt was acted out and written as if it were an end of term production at junior school. The first shoot out I saw consisted of a one sided battle. After that each line was of script was individually read out, mandatory pause, then a response, no feelings or attempt at making it feel real. Total waste of time like many of the other C class movies being tossed out there right now.

I saved it on rating 7.6/10 and next day I watched few minutes and I got mad why 7.6? Checked again rating droped already lol.