PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,6/10
602
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Karen y su marido se mudan a Washington. Pronto Karen conoce a Lisa, su encantadora vecina, y entablan amistad. Pero la relación no tardará en experimentar una serie de trágicos acontecimien... Leer todoKaren y su marido se mudan a Washington. Pronto Karen conoce a Lisa, su encantadora vecina, y entablan amistad. Pero la relación no tardará en experimentar una serie de trágicos acontecimientos.Karen y su marido se mudan a Washington. Pronto Karen conoce a Lisa, su encantadora vecina, y entablan amistad. Pero la relación no tardará en experimentar una serie de trágicos acontecimientos.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio en total
David James Lewis
- Alan
- (as David Lewis)
Hannah Zirke
- Allie
- (as Hannah J Zirke)
Thomas Wayne Hum
- Jury Foreman
- (as Thomas Hum)
Reseñas destacadas
I've seen a lot of Lifetime movies. They are hit and miss. "The Neighbor in the Window" is somewhere in the middle. It was an okay watch. It's just that there was nothing that special about it. The cast is fine. They all do a nice job. It's just that material isn't that hot. I don't want to bash this movie because I did kind of like it. It's that I wanted more than I got.
That was the brief description from experts at the end of the movie about the different kinds of stalkers and how they behave. That was somewhat interesting. Other than that, it was just another typical Lifetime movie with a typical (meaning, predictable) plot.
Oh, and just to nitpick another review here - "lady's" is possessive, not plural.
Oh, and just to nitpick another review here - "lady's" is possessive, not plural.
Karen (Jamie-Lynn Sigler) and her family relocate to Washington for her husband's new job and falls in love with her new house which has large, impressive windows. However, this new dream life quickly morphs into a nightmare when the looming presence of her neighbor, Lisa (Jenn Lyon), is all that cascades into those large panes of glass.
At first, Lisa seems like a promising friend. But soon, Karen begins catching her in bizarre lies and copycat behavior. Karen confides in Lisa that she lost a baby, so Lisa immediately makes up a story that she also lost a child - even buying an identical version of the necklace Karen wears to commemorate her lost child. Lisa lies about various health conditions, claiming she had lupus and cancer. She even copies Karen's car, her clothes and her desire to become a real estate agent.
Then, when Karen grows uncomfortable with Lisa's behavior, Lisa's tactics escalate. Lisa phones in false complaints that Karen is neglecting her son in an attempt to have him removed from her care. She even files for a restraining order against Karen that means Karen can't even hang out in her own backyard without violating it.
In the most dramatic move of all, she falsely accuses Karen of trying to mow her down with her car. This leads to a trial where Karen could have been convicted with attempted murder due to Lisa's lies and fabricated victimization. Instead, it results in her acquittal.
There's no murder for a change in this Lifetime thriller based on a real story. The subject around 'False victims' is interesting. I never heard of it so it prompted me to read about. Who says Lifetime thrillers isn't informative! It's quite watchable and intriguing, however the plot gets a bit thin towards the end and the court scene should have had more punch. The actress who plays the 'false victim' was very good and quite sinister.
At first, Lisa seems like a promising friend. But soon, Karen begins catching her in bizarre lies and copycat behavior. Karen confides in Lisa that she lost a baby, so Lisa immediately makes up a story that she also lost a child - even buying an identical version of the necklace Karen wears to commemorate her lost child. Lisa lies about various health conditions, claiming she had lupus and cancer. She even copies Karen's car, her clothes and her desire to become a real estate agent.
Then, when Karen grows uncomfortable with Lisa's behavior, Lisa's tactics escalate. Lisa phones in false complaints that Karen is neglecting her son in an attempt to have him removed from her care. She even files for a restraining order against Karen that means Karen can't even hang out in her own backyard without violating it.
In the most dramatic move of all, she falsely accuses Karen of trying to mow her down with her car. This leads to a trial where Karen could have been convicted with attempted murder due to Lisa's lies and fabricated victimization. Instead, it results in her acquittal.
There's no murder for a change in this Lifetime thriller based on a real story. The subject around 'False victims' is interesting. I never heard of it so it prompted me to read about. Who says Lifetime thrillers isn't informative! It's quite watchable and intriguing, however the plot gets a bit thin towards the end and the court scene should have had more punch. The actress who plays the 'false victim' was very good and quite sinister.
I'm a huge fan of Lifetime movies, and I'm willing to give movies such as these a lot of leeway when it comes to deviation from reality - but this was just too much to bear.
The Sopranos fan favorite Jamie-Lynn Sigler stars as the harried housewife who just moved into the clique-y neighborhood.
Without recounting all the missteps by Sigler throughout the movie, let's just cut to the chase - the attempted murder charge.
This community must have a very efficient "speedy trial" provision, because in most localities, an attempted MURDER trial can take a year or two to go to trial, not a a week or two.
And APPARENTLY the only evidence gathered for this murder trial is simply what we the viewers know sitting in our comfy chair at home.
They could have subpoenaed the reluctant curly haired neighbor. They could have tracked down the string of prior neighbors who went through the same thing. Where's all the video footage from the neighbors who ironically all set up surveillance systems all throughout the neighborhood very recently.
And when the psychotic neighbor finally takes the stand, her critical "intense grilling" by the defense lawyer consists of 2-3 soft questions over literally about 90 seconds. "No further questions, your Honor". Really?
And you would think the authorities took the victim daughter's eyewitness statement AT THE SCENE or down at the police station - and they wouldn't even had brought charges in the first place. It certainly wouldn't be coming out FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME AT TRIAL.
This was an ok but super-annoying watch - and only satisfying if you're a Sigler fan or you like seeing lying conniving neighbors get their comeuppance.
The Sopranos fan favorite Jamie-Lynn Sigler stars as the harried housewife who just moved into the clique-y neighborhood.
Without recounting all the missteps by Sigler throughout the movie, let's just cut to the chase - the attempted murder charge.
This community must have a very efficient "speedy trial" provision, because in most localities, an attempted MURDER trial can take a year or two to go to trial, not a a week or two.
And APPARENTLY the only evidence gathered for this murder trial is simply what we the viewers know sitting in our comfy chair at home.
They could have subpoenaed the reluctant curly haired neighbor. They could have tracked down the string of prior neighbors who went through the same thing. Where's all the video footage from the neighbors who ironically all set up surveillance systems all throughout the neighborhood very recently.
And when the psychotic neighbor finally takes the stand, her critical "intense grilling" by the defense lawyer consists of 2-3 soft questions over literally about 90 seconds. "No further questions, your Honor". Really?
And you would think the authorities took the victim daughter's eyewitness statement AT THE SCENE or down at the police station - and they wouldn't even had brought charges in the first place. It certainly wouldn't be coming out FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME AT TRIAL.
This was an ok but super-annoying watch - and only satisfying if you're a Sigler fan or you like seeing lying conniving neighbors get their comeuppance.
I loved this movie right up until the last 20 minutes. I couldn't wait to see how it ended but was very disappointed. And yes, as another reviewer said, our legal system does not work the way the movie portrayed. It was laughable.
¿Sabías que...?
- PifiasRestraining orders in Washington state begin as Temporary orders where as there is typically a ten to fourteen day order enforced before both parties have the opportunity in court regarding a permanent order (typically 1 or 2 years in duration) and its issuance. A judge would never issue a permanent order knowing both neighbors homes buttress each other or their children attend the same school. The order would typically be twenty feet or so and have no verbal contact. The plot holes in this movie only serve to make it believable in move reality but certainly nothing like this happens in real life.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Neighbor in the Window
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Dorothy Peacock Elementary School, Langley, Columbia Británica, Canadá(sign on building)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta