PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,9/10
2,8 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un examen de la investigación de la psiquiatra forense Dorothy Otnow Lewis, quien investigó la psicología de los asesinos.Un examen de la investigación de la psiquiatra forense Dorothy Otnow Lewis, quien investigó la psicología de los asesinos.Un examen de la investigación de la psiquiatra forense Dorothy Otnow Lewis, quien investigó la psicología de los asesinos.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Dorothy Otnow Lewis
- Self - Clinical Psychiatrist
- (as Dorothy Lewis)
Catherine Yeager
- Self - Clinical Psychologist
- (as Dr. Catherine Yeager)
Park Dietz
- Self - Forensic Psychiatrist
- (as Dr. Park Dietz)
Tom Brokaw
- Self - Host, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw
- (metraje de archivo)
Bill Clinton
- Self - Governor of Arkansas
- (metraje de archivo)
Thomas Coccuzzi
- Self - Defense Attorney for Arthur Shawcross
- (metraje de archivo)
Walt Disney
- Self - Animator
- (metraje de archivo)
- …
William Elledge
- Self - Convicted Murderer
- (metraje de archivo)
Henry Ford
- Self - Industrialist & Antisemite
- (metraje de archivo)
Joseph Paul Franklin
- Self - Convicted Murderer & Neo-Nazi Terrorist
- (metraje de archivo)
Charles Gibson
- Self - ABC News Anchor
- (metraje de archivo)
Joseph Goebbels
- Self - Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 - 1945
- (metraje de archivo)
Hermann Göring
- Self - President of the Reichstag, 1932 - 1945
- (metraje de archivo)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - Führer and Chancellor of Germany
- (metraje de archivo)
Joseph P. Kennedy
- Self - Kennedy Family Patriarch & Antisemite
- (metraje de archivo)
Reseñas destacadas
This documentary provided little insight into the study of the disassociative mind but rather highlighted Dr. Lewis's view of her most spectacular interactions with famous murderers. The documentary managed to turn a fascinating subject into a 😴.
On the subject dissosiative personality disorder, or the scapegoat to every ''eye for an eye''-fanaticand criminal court systen back in the medeval ages of 1980's and 1990's usa. beloved and hatred for her simple claim that noone is born evil, and that there are always an environmental or medical disorder behind every crime, the worse a crime, the more damaged the perputrator are.having an ethical code that says if your insane you cannot be punished to death by excecution, and that is a roaring cry that should be heard among the medical and justice superiors in every criminal court anywhere.
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
Purely an "anti death penalty" movie based on the notion that ALL murderers are brain damaged or have multiple personality/dissociative identity disorder. A lot of it is just pure BS based in nothing close to real science.
The topic is quite interesting, but about halfway through, I felt like it was getting repetitive. The same thing was being said in interview, just slightly different wording.
It's easy to start falling down the rabbit hole of whatever your life work is. I think Dorothy bridged some huge gaps in mental health and how that affects some people. Like the film said, killers are made, not born. However, to be in favor of halting death penalty cases so one can be researched (or do the researching) is very wrong. I feel this film focused on the humanity of the killer and ignored the victims. That's fine if you're doing research to understand the mind of a killer, but to want to take on the ethics of capital punishment goes too far. MANY people have really messed up childhoods and anyone reading this has experienced that or knows someone who did. They don't all start killing (and that's addressed in this film). But the death penalty isn't only about ridding humanity of a threat or to even be a deterrent for others. It's about getting justice for the victim(s) and the family(s) of the victim(s). It would be nice if life was free of horrible, terrible things like rape, murder, torture etc. Unfortunately, that's just a part of human nature that will never go away. Doing research and attempting to understand all facets of the human brain is fantastic - the more we know the better. However, the death penalty should be in place in EVERY STATE and used only for the worst of society who's crimes have been proved 100% - there's ZERO chance that a mistake has been made. Society needs that. To know that there is a punishment to fit the crime.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder, is a highly controversial diagnosis, with many arguments against it being anything more than an iatrogenic disorder -- in other words, caused by the therapy/therapist itself. Most notable amongst these arguments is that unlike other psychological disorders, DID is not observed outside of treatment with certain select clinicians, all of whom already believe in DID. What has been observed across all clinicians and researchers, however, are examples of confirmation bias, persuasive interview techniques, demand characteristics, and the oftentimes overwhelming urge to please demonstrated by patients in general. In addition, early North American works (DID is an overwhelmingly American disorder, yet another point of contention for the pro/anti-DID debate) which are seen as having started the DID diagnosis trend have been debunked in recent years as primarily fictitious stories, written to sell books. As controversial as the diagnosis of DID is, many feel that there may be some degree of negligence on the part of the producer(s), the director, and the film company as a whole for not employing a disclaimer as well as affording equal time to opposing expert viewpoints.
- ConexionesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 777: Mank + The Queen's Gambit (2020)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Crazy, Not Insane?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 59 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta