PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,9/10
12 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
El hijo del abogado Dhillon, Jass, está enamorado de Meet, pero sus hermanos se pelean con el abogado. Debido a esto, rechaza la mano de Meet en matrimonio. Sin otra opción, Jass teje un pla... Leer todoEl hijo del abogado Dhillon, Jass, está enamorado de Meet, pero sus hermanos se pelean con el abogado. Debido a esto, rechaza la mano de Meet en matrimonio. Sin otra opción, Jass teje un plan de locos para proponerle matrimonio a su amigo.El hijo del abogado Dhillon, Jass, está enamorado de Meet, pero sus hermanos se pelean con el abogado. Debido a esto, rechaza la mano de Meet en matrimonio. Sin otra opción, Jass teje un plan de locos para proponerle matrimonio a su amigo.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
It wasn't a family content..
It's rubbish..
They should have listed that it's not to watch with families..
Expected more respectful and sensible humour..
How could someone call their wife as their friends wife..
It's all rubbish..
Having a kid in the movie does not mean it's suitable for families with kids.
Good on the team for trying to make it a good movie but sadly it didn't work out In future they should take viewers feedback on consideration and make a better movie than this..also don't wana have carry on jatta 4..haha How many time can we waste time and money.. Spend your money wisely..lol.
Good on the team for trying to make it a good movie but sadly it didn't work out In future they should take viewers feedback on consideration and make a better movie than this..also don't wana have carry on jatta 4..haha How many time can we waste time and money.. Spend your money wisely..lol.
Its definitely not 10/10 neither 2/10. Its a 5 number movie.
Its a very average movie just like COJ2.
Songs amd locations are nice. Movie started well but then became routine stuff. One horror scene/ section had pathetic actings and dialogues.
On the other hand, some reviewers were saying that its same likenold then i donot agree as they used new writing in the movie.
It could have been made into a very good movie but smeep kang is a very average director. His first installment was copied thorougly from a gujarati movie, unless u all dont know about it. Since then he has nothing new for punjabi audience.
Actors acted well but when the script and dialogues are weak, you can't much.
Its a very average movie just like COJ2.
Songs amd locations are nice. Movie started well but then became routine stuff. One horror scene/ section had pathetic actings and dialogues.
On the other hand, some reviewers were saying that its same likenold then i donot agree as they used new writing in the movie.
It could have been made into a very good movie but smeep kang is a very average director. His first installment was copied thorougly from a gujarati movie, unless u all dont know about it. Since then he has nothing new for punjabi audience.
Actors acted well but when the script and dialogues are weak, you can't much.
I just want to ask the director of the movie one question, why? WHY was there a need to make such a nonsensical and worthless movie??
This movie proves that the directors and writers are only grown up physically but they forgot to apply their brains during its making. This "disaster" is filled with far-deviated comedy timings, third class dialogues and pointless stories.
Movie starts with the title song, followed by some laughters during first few scenes. But after that, it keeps getting worse and laughters turns into long yawns.
I just have humble requests to film makers to stop making disaster films just for the sake of business. Also, another request for audience, please dont watch this movie and save your hard-earned money.
This movie proves that the directors and writers are only grown up physically but they forgot to apply their brains during its making. This "disaster" is filled with far-deviated comedy timings, third class dialogues and pointless stories.
Movie starts with the title song, followed by some laughters during first few scenes. But after that, it keeps getting worse and laughters turns into long yawns.
I just have humble requests to film makers to stop making disaster films just for the sake of business. Also, another request for audience, please dont watch this movie and save your hard-earned money.
"Carry On Jatta 3" falls short of the comedic brilliance of its predecessor, taking what was once a good comedy and transforming it into a forced and underwhelming sequel. The film struggles to capture the charm and originality that made the original movie a hit.
One of the major letdowns of "Carry On Jatta 3" is the lead actress's performance, which is marred by her worst facial expressions. These lackluster expressions fail to convey the humor and emotions necessary for an engaging comedy. It's unfortunate that the film's comedic potential is hindered by such a crucial aspect of the lead actress's portrayal.
Furthermore, the humor feels forced throughout the movie, as if the filmmakers were desperately trying to replicate the success of the previous installments. The jokes often fall flat, lacking the natural wit and comedic timing that made the original film so enjoyable. Instead of delivering genuine laughs, the forced comedy feels contrived and uninspired.
Additionally, "Carry On Jatta 3" fails to bring anything new or innovative to the table, relying heavily on recycled ideas and predictable plotlines. The lack of originality further contributes to the overall disappointment of the film.
In conclusion, "Carry On Jatta 3" is a wasted opportunity that tarnishes the name of comedy and fails to live up to the charm and brilliance of its predecessors. The forced humor, coupled with the lead actress's poor facial expressions, makes this sequel a regrettable experience for fans of the original. It's best to approach this film with lowered expectations and a willingness to overlook its shortcomings.
One of the major letdowns of "Carry On Jatta 3" is the lead actress's performance, which is marred by her worst facial expressions. These lackluster expressions fail to convey the humor and emotions necessary for an engaging comedy. It's unfortunate that the film's comedic potential is hindered by such a crucial aspect of the lead actress's portrayal.
Furthermore, the humor feels forced throughout the movie, as if the filmmakers were desperately trying to replicate the success of the previous installments. The jokes often fall flat, lacking the natural wit and comedic timing that made the original film so enjoyable. Instead of delivering genuine laughs, the forced comedy feels contrived and uninspired.
Additionally, "Carry On Jatta 3" fails to bring anything new or innovative to the table, relying heavily on recycled ideas and predictable plotlines. The lack of originality further contributes to the overall disappointment of the film.
In conclusion, "Carry On Jatta 3" is a wasted opportunity that tarnishes the name of comedy and fails to live up to the charm and brilliance of its predecessors. The forced humor, coupled with the lead actress's poor facial expressions, makes this sequel a regrettable experience for fans of the original. It's best to approach this film with lowered expectations and a willingness to overlook its shortcomings.
Worst Punjabi movie ever made no sense at all
No character development not fun at all.
Please save your money guys useless movie .sonam bajwa not utilise properly .bn sharam not involved in the movie at all..so cringest movie of all time.
Carry on jatta 1 was much better..from this stupid movie. Gippy Grewal overacting ruin the movie for me senseless movie .only time waste money waste .. jaswinder bhala performance was good also karmjit was also good bhinu dhillon was not used properly. Kang was the worst director overall movie is 3/10......i don't know how people were saying positive about it.
Please save your money guys useless movie .sonam bajwa not utilise properly .bn sharam not involved in the movie at all..so cringest movie of all time.
Carry on jatta 1 was much better..from this stupid movie. Gippy Grewal overacting ruin the movie for me senseless movie .only time waste money waste .. jaswinder bhala performance was good also karmjit was also good bhinu dhillon was not used properly. Kang was the worst director overall movie is 3/10......i don't know how people were saying positive about it.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe scene where the lead characters are walking on the pipe between two buildings is copied from the movie Ishq (1997).
- ConexionesFollows Carry on Jatta (2012)
- Banda sonoraBura Haal
Performed by Atif Aslam
Written by Sagar
Music by Jaani
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Carry on Jatta 3?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 150.000.000 INR (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 3.353.522 US$
- Duración
- 2h 16min(136 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta