Caída en picado: El caso contra Boeing
La cineasta Rory Kennedy, nominada al Óscar, destapa la negligencia y la codicia empresarial que provocaron dos accidentes de aviones Boeing MAX 737 en tan solo cinco meses.La cineasta Rory Kennedy, nominada al Óscar, destapa la negligencia y la codicia empresarial que provocaron dos accidentes de aviones Boeing MAX 737 en tan solo cinco meses.La cineasta Rory Kennedy, nominada al Óscar, destapa la negligencia y la codicia empresarial que provocaron dos accidentes de aviones Boeing MAX 737 en tan solo cinco meses.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
Reseñas destacadas
In every single big corporation, especially after merges, there's literally not about a product you build, but about ... charts for shareholders.
Maybe ... if you are a corporate like Boeing, and if somebody dies, then maybe a CEO, maybe all of the shareholders should be questioned because it's actually them who are responsible. One by one. Not Boeing company. It's them. First shareholder, second, third, CEO etc.
Many companies lost it's reputation because of shareholders greed. It's so unfair that they have absolutely no responsibility. All they do is taking money, and actually ruining company values from inside, for the sake of their own profit.
In every newspaper there shouldn't be: boeing this, boeing that. Maybe if every newspaper would mention specifically shareholders by name, maybe this would change something. Public opinion would have chance to "meet" them. All the hate is targeted at Boeing, but it's NOT boeing. It's the people behind. They have name. They are human beings. Not giving documents fast enough is not Boeing. It's specific people. Name, by name.
I read a lot about this. One of the greatest articles is from a guy who was both a pilot and a software engineer. In short - what Boeing did with this 737max plane was that, they tried to fix hardware issues (plane they designed badly), with software. This plane should never fly.
The only thing that seems strange to me is the way they picture FAA as just another victim. Several stories from the time covered in depth the nuances of their relationship and the leeway FAA provided Boeing in these certification matters. The reluctance of FAA to ground planes is a sign of that. Some even argue this was the FAA acting to protect Boeing commercially instead of caring for US passengers safety.
¿Sabías que...?
- PifiasAt 1:10:25, Andy Pasztor can be seen writing "Pilots at the conbtrol" briefly, before "conbtrol" is auto-corrected to "control".
- Citas
Andy Pasztor: In addition to Congress trying to get to the bottom of this, the families of the victims really took this on as a personal issue. They felt that there needed to be some explanation of how two planes could have crashed within such a short period of time.
- ConexionesFeatured in Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Boeing (2024)
Selecciones populares
- How long is Downfall: The Case Against Boeing?Con tecnología de Alexa
- Could the programmer of the MCASS system - the cause of the crash be partly at blame for the crash?
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Untitled Boeing 737 Max/Rory Kennedy Project
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos(initial Boeing HQ and center of operations)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 29 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido