Documental que dibuja un futuro optimista según la humanidad adopta nuevas tecnologías e innovaciones y se replantea cómo gestiona el agua.Documental que dibuja un futuro optimista según la humanidad adopta nuevas tecnologías e innovaciones y se replantea cómo gestiona el agua.Documental que dibuja un futuro optimista según la humanidad adopta nuevas tecnologías e innovaciones y se replantea cómo gestiona el agua.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio en total
Reseñas destacadas
I recently watched this documentary with my family and kids over the weekend. I was eager to see what Matt Damon had to say about water!! All of my family enjoyed the film and learned something new including my 8 and 9 year old kids who have just informed me they would like to work in water!
The solutions presented were the right mix of science and story and the film really broke down some of the challenges in the water industry.
I hope there will be a Brave Blue part 2 or a series where they will go more into detail about each of the different areas within this complex industry.
(Beth's story was without doubt my favourite!)
The solutions presented were the right mix of science and story and the film really broke down some of the challenges in the water industry.
I hope there will be a Brave Blue part 2 or a series where they will go more into detail about each of the different areas within this complex industry.
(Beth's story was without doubt my favourite!)
I was shocked by how badly this film was put together. From the way it's edited, to the choice of music (and how it's laid into the film), to the cheesy introduction shots of the contributors, the jump cuts and sound cuts (you literally hear the cuts during Matt Damon's interview), down to the way it's written: not just cheesy commentary, hyperboles, random links trying to stitch scenes together and things which are obviously been written without even looking at the film (There's a hilarious moment where the commentary says "this man is... etc etc..etc... " over the shot of the sky. We only see the "man" in question after a few seconds. That's film-making 101).
The most impressive vistas are actually stock shots (I even recognised some from the Shutterstock Library).
It is disjointed and confused, cheesy, one-sided and simplistic, but I suppose the core message is probably what counts here (and how they were able to get people like Matt Damon and Liam Neeson), which is also why I'm not giving it 1 star.
There are some interesting snippets here and there and however badly the film is made, it does paint a promising picture of how new technologies are helping us to manage, clean and re-use our water.
It's a shame that such an important message was only able to get such a bad piece of film-making. Even more astonishing that it currently has 7.3 on imdb.
Full of vaporware tech.
It was painful to watch.
So many contradictions between chapters.
The odd chapters was interesting just to see existing industrial complex but mostly awful.
And the narrative was just silly.
How is this 7+ stars.
Several testimonials, including some from some Hollywood celebrities, about their views and solutions on how to solve the global water crisis.
I never thought I would find a doc. about helping planet Earth and its population bad, until I saw this.
It is an absolute chaos, starting with inconsistencies about what is said by each interlocutor, to gross editing errors, like the images (it is at the level of hearing aid ads or telemarketing about smoothies machines) to the sound and the terrible choice of the soundtrack, but above all, for not giving us anything relevant to retain on such an important subject.
When dairy or meat production industries are not mentioned once, pretty much everything is said about the purpose of this "documentary".
Worth a few points for references to a couple of technologies that in the future may help solving the problem, but not right now.
I never thought I would find a doc. about helping planet Earth and its population bad, until I saw this.
It is an absolute chaos, starting with inconsistencies about what is said by each interlocutor, to gross editing errors, like the images (it is at the level of hearing aid ads or telemarketing about smoothies machines) to the sound and the terrible choice of the soundtrack, but above all, for not giving us anything relevant to retain on such an important subject.
When dairy or meat production industries are not mentioned once, pretty much everything is said about the purpose of this "documentary".
Worth a few points for references to a couple of technologies that in the future may help solving the problem, but not right now.
The film is ok. The technologies shown are interesting and inspire some hope in the survival of the humanity, but the simplest and maybe the most important solution was not even mentioned. Ok, home filters of the "grey" water waste can save several thousand liters of water per month, but let's have a look at another example. The production cycle of just one liter of milk requires around a thousand liters of water; one burger patty requires several thousands liters. Just by switching to an oat or soy milk and ditching beef (and preferably all the meat) you will save enormous amounts of water, hundreds of thousands liters per year just in your household. We need to think globally. Water is used not only in our taps, but for all the products which we buy and we eat.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 750.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración50 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta