PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
3,5/10
14 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
John Wood dejó los pedazos de una civilización destrozada para regresar a sus raíces en el bosque después de que una pandemia de virus azotara al mundo.John Wood dejó los pedazos de una civilización destrozada para regresar a sus raíces en el bosque después de que una pandemia de virus azotara al mundo.John Wood dejó los pedazos de una civilización destrozada para regresar a sus raíces en el bosque después de que una pandemia de virus azotara al mundo.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Kamil Lemie
- Jorge
- (as Kamil Lemieszewski)
Reseñas destacadas
Honestly, you have to ask yourself how and why this was made. It's awful on every front. There are no real actors, the script is just terrible. One person wrote in another review "just because you can produce and star in a movie doesn't mean you should." That describes this.
It's supposed to be some end of world type situation where he's living in the woods and a lady comes across his path. The dialog is pretty awful and with their lack of acting skills, it's very hard to get through. You will have to fast forward to get through this mess. Then some bad guys come and there's some terrible fight scenes, they had to be making this up as they went along.
The main guy, who's name is above the title on the poster, it dreadfully awful. The name above the title on the poster is done with big name actors to get people to want to see the movie. There's no one who saw this poster and said "wow, I've got to see that!"
The guy has zero acting skills. He is buffed, clearly spending way more time on his body than his acting. But if you look at his credits, it's all "shorts" (which means it's just him and his buddies making short "films" on his camera) and "uncredited" which is an extra (which literally anyone can do). He has hardlyl any real credits. So why the name above the title? I guess to impress his mom because that's the only person who'd be impressed.
Rarely do I give a one star for something but this one deserves it. Any of the "ten star" reviews you see that rave about this were from people who worked on it. Notice how many other 'reviews' they have.
AVOID.
It's supposed to be some end of world type situation where he's living in the woods and a lady comes across his path. The dialog is pretty awful and with their lack of acting skills, it's very hard to get through. You will have to fast forward to get through this mess. Then some bad guys come and there's some terrible fight scenes, they had to be making this up as they went along.
The main guy, who's name is above the title on the poster, it dreadfully awful. The name above the title on the poster is done with big name actors to get people to want to see the movie. There's no one who saw this poster and said "wow, I've got to see that!"
The guy has zero acting skills. He is buffed, clearly spending way more time on his body than his acting. But if you look at his credits, it's all "shorts" (which means it's just him and his buddies making short "films" on his camera) and "uncredited" which is an extra (which literally anyone can do). He has hardlyl any real credits. So why the name above the title? I guess to impress his mom because that's the only person who'd be impressed.
Rarely do I give a one star for something but this one deserves it. Any of the "ten star" reviews you see that rave about this were from people who worked on it. Notice how many other 'reviews' they have.
AVOID.
The premise was good. The idea made sense. The acting on the other hand... if the movie actually has anyone that wasn't wooden, and could actually carry the movie, or even emote without looking like they crapped their pants it would have been watchable. Sadly, that is not the case. Even the nudity isn't worth the it.
There is a film saying that's it's so bad, it's good, like Roadhouse, which is a classic by the way.
Yes every actor has to start somewhere and I got thinking that if Daniel Stisen, sorry if my spelling is wrong, got the money to act in a better film then he could be a really good action star but this movie was beyond bad.
The acting was awful, no stars for that at all.
The fight scenes and yes there were many some good but mostly done in an amateur way.
When Daniel has lines to say and he tries to talk like a cross between Eastwood and Statham and the background music playing you can barely hear him speak.
This movie is on for just about 90 minutes and I struggled to stay the course.
Do yourself a favour and go past this one.
It's so bad, it's not even good.
Yes every actor has to start somewhere and I got thinking that if Daniel Stisen, sorry if my spelling is wrong, got the money to act in a better film then he could be a really good action star but this movie was beyond bad.
The acting was awful, no stars for that at all.
The fight scenes and yes there were many some good but mostly done in an amateur way.
When Daniel has lines to say and he tries to talk like a cross between Eastwood and Statham and the background music playing you can barely hear him speak.
This movie is on for just about 90 minutes and I struggled to stay the course.
Do yourself a favour and go past this one.
It's so bad, it's not even good.
What an absolute sham of a movie. The fact this is rated above a 5 baffles me. It was atrocious acting, bad violence, and full of more cheesy one liners than an actual script. It looked like I filmed it on my iPhone at time. Just plain pathetic.
This movie is so bad even the nudity is rubbish!!!!
Suck the personality, characters and story out of a movie and what you have left is Last Man Down.
Arnie would not want this guy to 'Get to the chopper'!
Suck the personality, characters and story out of a movie and what you have left is Last Man Down.
Arnie would not want this guy to 'Get to the chopper'!
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesLocations in and around military museums were used as sets for large parts of the movie. A naval museum and an aviation museum.
- PifiasWhen John extracts the bullet, there is a tracker on it, but there is no way that bullet would go down a barrel with any accuracy.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Last Man Down?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta