Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA group of urbex enthusiasts travel to the backwoods of Appalachia to capture footage of abandoned houses, when they unwittingly become the subjects of a much darker video - made by a differ... Leer todoA group of urbex enthusiasts travel to the backwoods of Appalachia to capture footage of abandoned houses, when they unwittingly become the subjects of a much darker video - made by a different kind of "enthusiast".A group of urbex enthusiasts travel to the backwoods of Appalachia to capture footage of abandoned houses, when they unwittingly become the subjects of a much darker video - made by a different kind of "enthusiast".
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
Kind of a good idea / premise but they blew it. Boring and not scary. What a bunch of jerks!
Barely got through this thing. Should be a cool concept: group of "urban explorers" who know each other through social media team up to explore some creepy woods to find out what happened to the protagonist's brother. The only reason this isn't a one is because parts of the opening sequence are cool. All downhill from there. Main guy CANNOT act and the supporting cast isn't better. Why is there a ghost psychic in this? Why don't these idiots just call the cops based on the opening video? I am from this area and there are legit creepy spots like this, but it could have been so much better.
As someone who explores abandoned buildings, I love watching movies about the hobby, as they are rarely ever realistic and provide a nice laugh. Red Woods is one such film.
The premise is cool: a group of people embark on a days-long trek into the woods to check out some abandoned houses and begin to find some strange things: a bloody mattress and a forgotten cemetery. The cinematography is gorgeous; they have some professional cameras, stabilizers, and a drone. The effects are pretty good and it's clear they spent some money on things.
The problem is everything else. The editing cuts bizarrely mid-sentence multiple times and it seems several scenes of plot are just missing altogether. The last half of the film becomes nearly incomprehensible. There are way too many characters and no one acts remotely like a normal human being would.
For example: the bodies. Both groups find dead bodies in these abandoned homes yet don't bother to tell each other and are joking about it less than a minute later.
Then that night for some reason one character attacks another and a random man shows up and tells a scary story to which NOBODY questions why he is there other than someone whispering 'who is he?'
The next day someone, I didn't even know who, disappeared. Then our characters find some cliche hillbilly's and murder them in self defense, which again doesn't bother them.
There is also a VERY confusing subplot about a "first team" that left beforehand they are going to meet up with and two of the group possibly being some sort of x-files type government agents.
I can only imagine that writer/director Nicholas Danko watched a lot of the popular urbex videos with clickbait titles such as "found bodies!" "Secret test lab!" Etc and based this all on that.
Found footage movies are meant to suspend our disbelief more so than a regular film, essentially telling the viewer 'hey, this is real' but literally nothing in Red Woods would make someone believe that. In addition to the previously mentioned issues, the acting by just about everyone comes off as kids in a high school play. The psychic girl, Jack (referred to as Jax in one scene by everyone) is the only one that shows some minor talent, and her friend is passable. The woodsman explorer guy, Cross is so horrible in his 'breakdown' scene after falling on a body that it gives new meaning to the word 'stilted'
Red Woods should have been a simple, fun setup but Danko is unable to tell a coherent story. Slick production levels alone do not make it watchable either.
The premise is cool: a group of people embark on a days-long trek into the woods to check out some abandoned houses and begin to find some strange things: a bloody mattress and a forgotten cemetery. The cinematography is gorgeous; they have some professional cameras, stabilizers, and a drone. The effects are pretty good and it's clear they spent some money on things.
The problem is everything else. The editing cuts bizarrely mid-sentence multiple times and it seems several scenes of plot are just missing altogether. The last half of the film becomes nearly incomprehensible. There are way too many characters and no one acts remotely like a normal human being would.
For example: the bodies. Both groups find dead bodies in these abandoned homes yet don't bother to tell each other and are joking about it less than a minute later.
Then that night for some reason one character attacks another and a random man shows up and tells a scary story to which NOBODY questions why he is there other than someone whispering 'who is he?'
The next day someone, I didn't even know who, disappeared. Then our characters find some cliche hillbilly's and murder them in self defense, which again doesn't bother them.
There is also a VERY confusing subplot about a "first team" that left beforehand they are going to meet up with and two of the group possibly being some sort of x-files type government agents.
I can only imagine that writer/director Nicholas Danko watched a lot of the popular urbex videos with clickbait titles such as "found bodies!" "Secret test lab!" Etc and based this all on that.
Found footage movies are meant to suspend our disbelief more so than a regular film, essentially telling the viewer 'hey, this is real' but literally nothing in Red Woods would make someone believe that. In addition to the previously mentioned issues, the acting by just about everyone comes off as kids in a high school play. The psychic girl, Jack (referred to as Jax in one scene by everyone) is the only one that shows some minor talent, and her friend is passable. The woodsman explorer guy, Cross is so horrible in his 'breakdown' scene after falling on a body that it gives new meaning to the word 'stilted'
Red Woods should have been a simple, fun setup but Danko is unable to tell a coherent story. Slick production levels alone do not make it watchable either.
Absolutely terrible...bad script that made no sense, with probably the worst actors I've ever seen.
But it failed.
The covered bridge seen early in the movie I believe was at McConnell's Mill State Park in Butler County PA. I've walked the trails there and I've walked across that bridge. It's a beautiful area but also dangerous.
I thought the camera work was awful. The entire movie is blurred and slightly pixelated.
None of the actors stand out.
There were some good moments in this movie but they were too few and far between and hard to see.
Disappointing.
The covered bridge seen early in the movie I believe was at McConnell's Mill State Park in Butler County PA. I've walked the trails there and I've walked across that bridge. It's a beautiful area but also dangerous.
I thought the camera work was awful. The entire movie is blurred and slightly pixelated.
None of the actors stand out.
There were some good moments in this movie but they were too few and far between and hard to see.
Disappointing.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesWriter/Director Nick Danko used local actors for this movie, wanting to keep the authentic feel of the film.
- PifiasAfter knocking out the backwoods man, Cross' knuckles are nor bruised or cut, but clearly have large red circles of equal size drawn on them.
- Banda sonoraPaper Town
written by Josh Shapiro, Nicole Moultos
performed by Rocket Loves Blue
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Red Woods?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta