Secretos en el hielo

They present the stories as a guessing game of sorts and posit some ridiculous theories before actually explaining what the actual facts are. They should just present the stories forthright.and add additional context and background instead of chewing up time with nonsense. The content is interesting enough but the presentation is awful.

Loved the show and the content. Things like this are right up my alley, mummies, mystery etc. One thing that made me write was juliethomson-17221 R review. She makes no sense and obviously holds some kind of grudge. We went back to see what she meant. No weird sounds, just excellent narrating. Don't pay attention to imaginary issues, watch and enjoy the show. R

I like the show, however, when Tyler Irving (a Science Reporter) said "these ones" in a sentence about the craters in the Witch's Hole I could not believe my hearing. Really Tyler. It's "this one" or "these".

Random "experts" weigh in with stilted reading of some terribly written pseudo exposition. It is written at about a grade 6 level and delivered woodenly by these people who couldn't act or voice-over a commercial for ass cream.

This is the exact same formula used by a multitude of shows like this in regular rotation on the History Channel, Cottage Life as infinitum. The only saving grace is the fact Andrew Gough hasn't popped his smarmy head up yet. And a fair bit of the topics really have nothing to do with ice or anything frozen in it. So once again, stretched out and overly dramatic topics explained by the world's worst actors.

The ENGLISH voice over narrator continually pronounced nuclear as nucular! It's like nails on a blackboard.