Godfather

I don't know why they changed very good original script changed so much and all character depth we seen in original version completely gone, they changed old chirufilm and didn't give good impact ,utterly waste in all side of the movie compared to original version only one character is justified in this film was ,the character played Vivek Oberoi did in original version ...that actor is good 👍👍 . VFX was very poor like cartoonish bomb blast , bike fires missile at a container lorry scene was very illlogical move from the film maker..Personallyy i don't recommend this movie ..sorry chiru sir ,sorry sallu bhai.

The story features good content and characters.

However, the screenplay suffers from being excessively slow-paced and lacking excitement.

Both the script and direction fail to match the quality of the original version.

Chiranjeevi is suitable for the role and delivers a commendable performance in many scenes, although some are not handled as effectively.

It would be unfair to compare Chiranjeevi to Mohanlal from the original film.

Sathya Dev also performs well in his role, although not as brilliantly as Vivek Oberoi.

Nayanthara follows her usual pattern of acting, similar to her previous films like "Tulasi," "Viswasam," and "Jayasimha." There's nothing new in her portrayal.

The on-screen pairing of Chiranjeevi and Nayanthara as brother and sister appears odd.

Salman Khan's role feels wasted, or rather, a good role is wasted on Salman.

The background score lifted from Vikram Veda is funny.

The cinematography is well-executed.

Editing seems to focus excessively on slow-motion sequences.

This film is not worth watching in theaters. It would be better to wait for its release on an OTT platform, especially if you haven't seen the original "Lucifer."

If you have seen the original movie Lucifer then you can compare that suspense level is very high in Lucifer compared to Godfather.

Poster and trailer already reveled that there is some relation between Chiranjeevi and Salmaan and while watching the movie you can guess there is some relation.

Salmaan's role is overexaggerated in the movie and the fight seens are overextended which shifts the audiance attendance to this side character.

Also the plotting of songs are not appropriate and seems like they are trying to fit in the songs for no reason.

Over all It is not worth watching. But the original movie Lucifer deserves a watch.

Mainly this whole part belongs to Mohanlal himself (Lucifer), with this movie it's like he slammed a giant sword into a mountain/ground with his acting skills. But i see that a Telugu moderate actor chiranjeevi took hold of this Godfather movie as a remake and thought that he would handle it well more than legendary Mohanlal did, I've seen the movie but i don't see chiranjeevi dominated the movie, it's far worse than expected he failed doing it. Even nayanathara performance is worse,i don't see any prodigy here because the acting levels of everyone are very low and the lead actor has failed to give his best. Original is better to watch again.

I have dared to watch the movie and got a lingering headache. Lucifer is 1000 times more fine movie than this cheap remake. If the director has just copied as is then it would've been better but it was worst after changing the story and background music is like a comedy tunes. Salman khan is the worst riding the bike as a one man army. I would suggest chiranjeevi to take a nap and rest, he looks like his rival mohan babu. Movies like Lucifer and Ayyappanum Koshiyum are masterpieces and tollywood is ruining them with remakes and trying to show the super hero roles for the main characters but forgetting that those characters are perfect as is and the content should not be altered. Learn from hollywood which does remake of international movies without spoiling the content (example : the man called ove is being remake by Tom Hanks with the name the man called otto). Learn from them and don't just blindly go with fan approval.