Old Man
- 2022
- 1h 37min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,9/10
3,7 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un excursionista perdido en la profundidad del bosque, se encuentra con la cabaña de un errático anciano. Lo que inicia como una conversación cordial, pronto se vuelve en una situación pelig... Leer todoUn excursionista perdido en la profundidad del bosque, se encuentra con la cabaña de un errático anciano. Lo que inicia como una conversación cordial, pronto se vuelve en una situación peligrosa.Un excursionista perdido en la profundidad del bosque, se encuentra con la cabaña de un errático anciano. Lo que inicia como una conversación cordial, pronto se vuelve en una situación peligrosa.
- Premios
- 1 premio en total
Reseñas destacadas
No pun intended - if you like or even love Stephen Lang ... well I do not need to convince you. If not, this may be able to convince you to to love him - his performance is everything! Yes there is the script (with a twist or two on your way or rather the movies way) ... but it is how he delivers whatever they give him.
That said, we do realize something is off from the get go. But what is it? Maybe you will surprised, maybe you can guess way before I did, where it goes with it. Maybe the new character late in the game will throw you off, maybe it won't ... there is a lot of factors that have to work for you, to like the movie. One is the pace - the other your patience with the performance - which is excellent of course, but might not be something that floats your boat ... just saying.
That said, we do realize something is off from the get go. But what is it? Maybe you will surprised, maybe you can guess way before I did, where it goes with it. Maybe the new character late in the game will throw you off, maybe it won't ... there is a lot of factors that have to work for you, to like the movie. One is the pace - the other your patience with the performance - which is excellent of course, but might not be something that floats your boat ... just saying.
This is like a stage play.
Stephen Lang was great, pace was good and the story was interesting enough to make me invested. Not for a second i felt bored and there is a twist i didn't see it coming. However, i can't recommend it. Just because the twist was unexpected, it doesn't mean that i liked it. Story was not illogical or dumb but still, some things didn't make much sense. The ending was kinda chaotic. Zero explanations given about Rascal, the cabin and what is this all about. I could overlook those details, a certain amount of ambiguity is not always a bad thing, but i can't get over the fact that the victimizer was more likeable than the victim. Thus, i didn't enjoy the ending, it was sad and not cathartic.
In any case, this is not a bad movie, and if you love dialogue driven drama/mystery movies, maybe you will like it more than me.
Stephen Lang was great, pace was good and the story was interesting enough to make me invested. Not for a second i felt bored and there is a twist i didn't see it coming. However, i can't recommend it. Just because the twist was unexpected, it doesn't mean that i liked it. Story was not illogical or dumb but still, some things didn't make much sense. The ending was kinda chaotic. Zero explanations given about Rascal, the cabin and what is this all about. I could overlook those details, a certain amount of ambiguity is not always a bad thing, but i can't get over the fact that the victimizer was more likeable than the victim. Thus, i didn't enjoy the ending, it was sad and not cathartic.
In any case, this is not a bad movie, and if you love dialogue driven drama/mystery movies, maybe you will like it more than me.
I was completely unaware of this movie. But it was mainly the handsome poster that made me curious about the story. So I set it up totally without a trailer or any prior knowledge.
The film starts in a hut and that is where it takes place for 90%.
You quickly get the feeling that you are not watching a movie, but a play.
Stephen Lang's acting is very clever and believable. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of Marc Senter (who also co-produces this film).
As for the story, it is very easy to guess what is actually going on and the "twist" can't really be called a twist.
It feels like a missed opportunity, unfortunately.
5/10 for Stephen Lang's acting performance.
The film starts in a hut and that is where it takes place for 90%.
You quickly get the feeling that you are not watching a movie, but a play.
Stephen Lang's acting is very clever and believable. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of Marc Senter (who also co-produces this film).
As for the story, it is very easy to guess what is actually going on and the "twist" can't really be called a twist.
It feels like a missed opportunity, unfortunately.
5/10 for Stephen Lang's acting performance.
This movie captured my attention from the start. Right away I started asking questions about what was happening and why. The old man, who is played by Stephen Lang, was an enigma and I wanted to know more about him and who Raskel was. Not long after the start of the story another man shows up at the old man's door claiming to be lost and in need of help, but the old man is paranoid and scares the heck out of him. The two characters get to know each other for most of the movie and the whole time I'm mesmerized and thinking that one of the two characters is going to kill the other, but which one? During that time I was really enjoying the movie, enough to give it a 8 or maybe a 9 out of 10, but then the big reveal happened and I didn't really like what happened. It brought my rating down to a 7. I thought the story was told very well. I thought the acting was really good. I liked pretty much everything about the production, direction, writing, sound, basically all the technical aspect of the movie were done really well, but that ending just wasn't satisfying at all. I would still recommend that people give this movie a watch, if not just for the story being told so well, but also because Stephen Lang is so captivating to watch in this movie.
Being a subtle fan of Lucky Mcgee, I envisioned something very different, as I was walking in knowing very little and also avoided trailers.
It's presented like a play. In other words, a one room, mostly 2 person venture. No real surprises but it has somewhat of a payoff that some might see coming, as I did, heading into the third act.
With that said, it's glacially slow at times---but I felt the dialogue was the glue that helped the weakish script hold up and may also have helped with the ending as well.
Violence and horror are pretty much surprisingly subdued---was more of a thriller in my opinion. Stephen Lang absolutely delivers the good as does Mcgee's intent---it just may be overlooked by some that get frustrated with the pacing.
6/10.
It's presented like a play. In other words, a one room, mostly 2 person venture. No real surprises but it has somewhat of a payoff that some might see coming, as I did, heading into the third act.
With that said, it's glacially slow at times---but I felt the dialogue was the glue that helped the weakish script hold up and may also have helped with the ending as well.
Violence and horror are pretty much surprisingly subdued---was more of a thriller in my opinion. Stephen Lang absolutely delivers the good as does Mcgee's intent---it just may be overlooked by some that get frustrated with the pacing.
6/10.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe script was originally written as a stage play.
- Banda sonoraBack of the Water
Performed by AJ Lambert with Joe Kraemer
Words and Music by AJ Lambert and Joe Kraemer
Produced by AJ Lambert, Lucky McKee, and Joe Kraemer
Published by Spindlekix Music (BMI) and Mary Had A Lambert Music (ASCAP)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Old Man?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 425.113 US$
- Duración
- 1h 37min(97 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta