Añade un argumento en tu idiomaFollows a joyful search for truth behind popular automotive myths, to try to answer the biggest questions on every car fan's mind.Follows a joyful search for truth behind popular automotive myths, to try to answer the biggest questions on every car fan's mind.Follows a joyful search for truth behind popular automotive myths, to try to answer the biggest questions on every car fan's mind.
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
I like the show. It's fun it will probably keep getting better... But the woman is unwatchable. If she is talking you'll have to fast forward. Don't watch live.
In general the show is entertaining, however In one episode they spent the whole effort making 3D print vans, chopping vans and testing aerodynamics. A shorter more aerodynamic van existed from 1995-1999 then got a slight bend at the windshield for 1999-2006 before it was part of what bankrupted Pontiac out of existence. People buy full size vans because they need the full size for both cargo and people (enclosed!) google 1997 Pontiac transport and you will see an aerodynamic "mini" van ... that no one wanted. The 2.7% gas savings (highway only!) was not worth the sacrifice in ... why they got a van in the first place !!! It's about function not form and fuel economy. And of the day, people and cargo don't get moved in FIATS !!!!!
Had to check this out since I loved the original Mythbusters series, but it was disappointing to where I haven't been able to watch an episode for more than a few minutes. I'm somewhat into cars, but there are too many irritations to hold my interest. Watching the over-decorated girl (Faye?) overact and feign interest as she's instructed about birds in episode 5 was agonizing.
Classic Mythbusters was great entertainment. Likable stars answering questions many people have, like what happens when a gun goes off in an airplane. In a typical episode they would have two teams pursuing two myths. The chemistry and natural acting ability, coupled with creative solutions to everyday questions, made the show fun to watch.
This reboot is not exactly great entertainment. It features likable stars, including Tory from the original Mythbusters, but the questions they are answering are questions few people have. Did the Fast and Furious 8 turbo hack work as depicted? I saw the movie, am a car guy, and never gave that a second thought. Would the car from the 1960s cartoon the Flintstones work? Uh, it's a cartoon. Not exactly a myth.
While likable individually, there is no chemistry between the cast members. The presentation is the main lead, who is clearly knowledgeable, telling the other two what to do. It would be like Grant telling Kari and Tory what to do. Gone is the group creativity of the original show. Worse, the script demands frequent emotional responses to banal things. It all feels forced, all the more so because the cast aren't likely to win any acting awards.
Since they have a small cast, there is one myth per episode. This slows the show down. Most of the runtime is watching three people doing manual labor and pretending to be amazed/scared/shocked at not much. Not exactly thrilling.
Overall the show is passable, especially if you're into cars, but the similarities to the original Mythbusters is largely limited to Tory, the announcer, and the show name.
This reboot is not exactly great entertainment. It features likable stars, including Tory from the original Mythbusters, but the questions they are answering are questions few people have. Did the Fast and Furious 8 turbo hack work as depicted? I saw the movie, am a car guy, and never gave that a second thought. Would the car from the 1960s cartoon the Flintstones work? Uh, it's a cartoon. Not exactly a myth.
While likable individually, there is no chemistry between the cast members. The presentation is the main lead, who is clearly knowledgeable, telling the other two what to do. It would be like Grant telling Kari and Tory what to do. Gone is the group creativity of the original show. Worse, the script demands frequent emotional responses to banal things. It all feels forced, all the more so because the cast aren't likely to win any acting awards.
Since they have a small cast, there is one myth per episode. This slows the show down. Most of the runtime is watching three people doing manual labor and pretending to be amazed/scared/shocked at not much. Not exactly thrilling.
Overall the show is passable, especially if you're into cars, but the similarities to the original Mythbusters is largely limited to Tory, the announcer, and the show name.
I have watched every episode of the original and every released episode of this version. Pros: the familiar narrator is great.
Cons: the cast has no chemistry. On their own they seem interesting, but together it feels forced and they over explain every concept to each other. Bisi comes off as condescending.
They need a new director, lose the feigned excitement and inflection, and stop explaining every detail like they are teaching it to toddlers.
Cons: the cast has no chemistry. On their own they seem interesting, but together it feels forced and they over explain every concept to each other. Bisi comes off as condescending.
They need a new director, lose the feigned excitement and inflection, and stop explaining every detail like they are teaching it to toddlers.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Motor MythBusters have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta