Añade un argumento en tu idiomaJason Sutherland wants to prove that such things as Bigfoot exist, but he doesn't want to kill one to do so. He and others come up with a non-lethal way to verify their existence but a pro-k... Leer todoJason Sutherland wants to prove that such things as Bigfoot exist, but he doesn't want to kill one to do so. He and others come up with a non-lethal way to verify their existence but a pro-kill advocate tries to beat them to the punch.Jason Sutherland wants to prove that such things as Bigfoot exist, but he doesn't want to kill one to do so. He and others come up with a non-lethal way to verify their existence but a pro-kill advocate tries to beat them to the punch.
DeAnna Driscoll
- Stephanie
- (as Deanna Driscoll)
Reseñas destacadas
This movie was awesome. The storyline was great, actors did a good job portraying their characters and I liked the ending. It's a believable story. Scott always produces good films but this one is one of his best. I love all the scenery shown in the movie as you really get a feel for how difficult the terrain can be trying to study these creatures. I also liked how people characters were open minded about the possibility bigfoot exists it really added to the movie. Id put this up there with Willow Creek and Exists. It's definitely worth the watch especially if you like more believable movies about bigfoot.
The thing which kills Unverified before it can even really get going is not the lack of budget, or even the quality of the actors, but the pacing.
The film, which we will be generous enough to refer it to as, opens with a long spell of a realtor driving to a house. But wait! There is a gate in the driveway. We see her get out of her car, open the gate. Get back in her car and drive through the gate. Get out of her car again close the gate. Drive on. This is not how cinematic narrative is supposed to be (unless Someone was being paid by the minute to produce this, in which case, fine lol).
And this is pretty typical of the pacing of the whole film. It's not so much amateurish, because amateur can infer some level of enthusiasm, as just not really watchable.
I very rarely rate anything below 3 but I must put this in that category as a warning to anybody against making the mistake of watching it for an evening of entertainment.
The film, which we will be generous enough to refer it to as, opens with a long spell of a realtor driving to a house. But wait! There is a gate in the driveway. We see her get out of her car, open the gate. Get back in her car and drive through the gate. Get out of her car again close the gate. Drive on. This is not how cinematic narrative is supposed to be (unless Someone was being paid by the minute to produce this, in which case, fine lol).
And this is pretty typical of the pacing of the whole film. It's not so much amateurish, because amateur can infer some level of enthusiasm, as just not really watchable.
I very rarely rate anything below 3 but I must put this in that category as a warning to anybody against making the mistake of watching it for an evening of entertainment.
My husband and I just finished watching Unverified. I'm not easy to please but this movie was surprisingly good. You have to have a brain a bit bigger than that of a gnat (unlike the first reviewer) to appreciate how the story unfolded. It's not like watching paint dry. At first I was REALLY skeptical as to whether we'd turn it off in the first 5 minutes but we were both glad we watched it all the way through. I didn't recognize any of the actors but they were all really good and really believable. All in all, we both enjoyed the movie. I also told my husband that I was so happy that it kept me interested rather than looking at the clock wondering when it would be over. Go in with an open mind. If you have a short attention span, find something else to watch. Know your shortcomings and move on, otherwise just sit back and enjoy the movie.
There are not a lot of movies that I seriously dislike but I'm not going to lie, I seriously dislike this one.
It was a massive pain to get through this. I like to think in my 30 years on this earth I've seen a lot of movies and seen a lot of bad (and good) movies so I am a good judge of films and sometimes even I swing and miss.
I just saw a couple reviews raving about this and I did not read all the reviews. And no one knows better than I not to go by "reviews" in IMDB when it comes to deciding if you should see a movie.
A guy wants to prove there is a bigfoot. He doesn't want to hurt Bigfoot but other people do. And that's the story.
Yikes.
And you know what's a good judge of if a movie is bad or not? Check out the photos on IMDB for the movie. This one is the perfect example. A guy looking around. A lady in her car looking through the mirror. Some people at dinner. A bunch of nothing. That's what you want to represent your movie? Why not show a wall or perhaps a sidewalk or a book? I mean, I'm no expert on making movies or promoting movies but you'd think you'd want photos that people are going to look at and go "I need to see this."
I am not smart. That should have been the sign that this was tedious to get through.
So yes, I did not like this movie. Not an interesting story or well made. And you know what I miss from something like this? A Bigfoot. At least give me that.
It was a massive pain to get through this. I like to think in my 30 years on this earth I've seen a lot of movies and seen a lot of bad (and good) movies so I am a good judge of films and sometimes even I swing and miss.
I just saw a couple reviews raving about this and I did not read all the reviews. And no one knows better than I not to go by "reviews" in IMDB when it comes to deciding if you should see a movie.
A guy wants to prove there is a bigfoot. He doesn't want to hurt Bigfoot but other people do. And that's the story.
Yikes.
And you know what's a good judge of if a movie is bad or not? Check out the photos on IMDB for the movie. This one is the perfect example. A guy looking around. A lady in her car looking through the mirror. Some people at dinner. A bunch of nothing. That's what you want to represent your movie? Why not show a wall or perhaps a sidewalk or a book? I mean, I'm no expert on making movies or promoting movies but you'd think you'd want photos that people are going to look at and go "I need to see this."
I am not smart. That should have been the sign that this was tedious to get through.
So yes, I did not like this movie. Not an interesting story or well made. And you know what I miss from something like this? A Bigfoot. At least give me that.
I had a lot of fun watching it with a group of friends. The film sparked some good conversations about how far some people will go to prove the existence of unverified animals. The movie builds in intensity throughout, and I couldn't tell what was going to happen until the very end. I also appreciated the realistic attitude towards the unverified creature, more scientific than slapdash. No cliché shock tactics, which seem to be common in monster movies. It was refreshing to not have to look at far fetched overdone CGI images. The movie had a more rugged and real feel to it and I loved the scenery.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta