PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,4/10
7,4 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Sigue a un famoso cazarrecompensas que se encuentra con su enemigo jurado, un jugador profesional y forajido que había enviado a prisión años antes.Sigue a un famoso cazarrecompensas que se encuentra con su enemigo jurado, un jugador profesional y forajido que había enviado a prisión años antes.Sigue a un famoso cazarrecompensas que se encuentra con su enemigo jurado, un jugador profesional y forajido que había enviado a prisión años antes.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio y 3 nominaciones en total
Luis Chávez
- Esteban Romero
- (as Luis Chavez)
J.D. Garfield
- Luis Andrade
- (as JD Garfield)
Reseñas destacadas
I read the poor reviews, and I think I saw a different movie. Either that, or those who don't like Westerns because . . . They're Westerns, decided to vent their frustrations after junk like Batgirl, The 4400 remake, the Bros flick, and the other Hollywood trendy junk people don't want fell flat. Who knows?
This is Walter Hill being Walter Hill. Gritty, realistic, devoid of Technicolor fluff. The landscape is unpleasant, uninviting, because that's what it is in this area of the southwest. People are living on the hard edge, because there isn't much else.
This tale, in the mold of The Professionals and The Wild Bunch, is not in the same category as The Undefeated. There's no sweetness and light, just the reality people of this era faced.
The acting is fine, the script is good, and the directing, that's Walter Hill. My only knock on this one, the same lighting and filtering used in the exteriors was applied to the interior shots in a way that's noticeable. That's not something one should notice.
This is Walter Hill being Walter Hill. Gritty, realistic, devoid of Technicolor fluff. The landscape is unpleasant, uninviting, because that's what it is in this area of the southwest. People are living on the hard edge, because there isn't much else.
This tale, in the mold of The Professionals and The Wild Bunch, is not in the same category as The Undefeated. There's no sweetness and light, just the reality people of this era faced.
The acting is fine, the script is good, and the directing, that's Walter Hill. My only knock on this one, the same lighting and filtering used in the exteriors was applied to the interior shots in a way that's noticeable. That's not something one should notice.
With all the cheap B westerns lately, finally a decent one comes along.
The cast is superb. You can't beat Christoph Waltz. He does a great job as the bounty hunter. Rachel Brosnahan played her part as a strong female character. I really liked seeing Willem Dafoe in a new movie.
It has a good story. Complements to the writer, director and casting agency. The movie was entertaining to watch.
It didn't have that big Hollywood feel but I enjoyed it very much.
Coming from 50 years of watching a lot of westerns.
I'm afraid after the mishap with Alex Baldwins movie "Rust", we may never see another decent western.
The cast is superb. You can't beat Christoph Waltz. He does a great job as the bounty hunter. Rachel Brosnahan played her part as a strong female character. I really liked seeing Willem Dafoe in a new movie.
It has a good story. Complements to the writer, director and casting agency. The movie was entertaining to watch.
It didn't have that big Hollywood feel but I enjoyed it very much.
Coming from 50 years of watching a lot of westerns.
I'm afraid after the mishap with Alex Baldwins movie "Rust", we may never see another decent western.
Walter Hill is back with a solid old school western.
Unfortunately, films of this type are no longer made, today we are invaded by the rubbish of Marvel, by dozens of useless and pathetic reboots and remakes and in fact this film ignored by most of the public lobotomized by the great empty and soulless blockbusters.
Hill, on the other hand, packs an exquisitely retro, dark and funny film at the right point with a wonderful cast, above all obviously the always immense Christoph Waltz who plays a character very similar to the one he played in Django Unchained, but also Willem Dafoe and the beautiful and talented Rachel Brosnahan give some really good performances.
A film that goes straight to its purpose without getting lost in chatter, without lasting 3 hours (which today seems mandatory), but the usual hour and forty-five as it used to be.
My advice is not to waste time with yet another Creed, with Top Gun 2 or with the cinecomics rubbish, but rather watch this solid film, which is certainly not a masterpiece, but it is undoubtedly a very good film, better than 90% of the trash that Hollywood produces today.
Unfortunately, films of this type are no longer made, today we are invaded by the rubbish of Marvel, by dozens of useless and pathetic reboots and remakes and in fact this film ignored by most of the public lobotomized by the great empty and soulless blockbusters.
Hill, on the other hand, packs an exquisitely retro, dark and funny film at the right point with a wonderful cast, above all obviously the always immense Christoph Waltz who plays a character very similar to the one he played in Django Unchained, but also Willem Dafoe and the beautiful and talented Rachel Brosnahan give some really good performances.
A film that goes straight to its purpose without getting lost in chatter, without lasting 3 hours (which today seems mandatory), but the usual hour and forty-five as it used to be.
My advice is not to waste time with yet another Creed, with Top Gun 2 or with the cinecomics rubbish, but rather watch this solid film, which is certainly not a masterpiece, but it is undoubtedly a very good film, better than 90% of the trash that Hollywood produces today.
Terrific director, with a star cast of actors, I was really waiting for this movie to be released and my expectations were pretty high. What a disappointment...
The bad: the first thing I noticed was that the photography was average (at best). Almost tv quality (low level). THAT I am not used to when watching Walter Hill movies which usually have got terrific technical details. Not this time around. Even the sound score sounded average. Bummer.
But even worse the acting performances by Cristophter Waltz and Willem Dafoe were bland. As if they were speed reading their lines without any real gusto.
This looks pretty much like a Corona era movie that has been recently released and has suffered from production and money problems, because I really get the feel this movie was somehow rushed. Bummer.
The bad: the first thing I noticed was that the photography was average (at best). Almost tv quality (low level). THAT I am not used to when watching Walter Hill movies which usually have got terrific technical details. Not this time around. Even the sound score sounded average. Bummer.
But even worse the acting performances by Cristophter Waltz and Willem Dafoe were bland. As if they were speed reading their lines without any real gusto.
This looks pretty much like a Corona era movie that has been recently released and has suffered from production and money problems, because I really get the feel this movie was somehow rushed. Bummer.
I'd start by saying Waltz, Dafoe, Bratt and the others are great actors. All did a great job with what they had here. Problem is, not sure what they had here.
The scenes were a bit choppy and kept waiting for a tv commercial to play between them.
Pretty sure I nodded off at one point and missed some, but it made no difference.
This was a western, I think, but not one I'd recommend for western movie watchers. The actors are top notch but just couldn't save it.
I would have tried for a spaghetti western vibe over this 50s American tv series type. The scenes with Waltz and Dafoe were good but the writing, no sir, I didn't like it.
It was simply too elementary. Ah well, better luck next time.
The scenes were a bit choppy and kept waiting for a tv commercial to play between them.
Pretty sure I nodded off at one point and missed some, but it made no difference.
This was a western, I think, but not one I'd recommend for western movie watchers. The actors are top notch but just couldn't save it.
I would have tried for a spaghetti western vibe over this 50s American tv series type. The scenes with Waltz and Dafoe were good but the writing, no sir, I didn't like it.
It was simply too elementary. Ah well, better luck next time.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesMatt Harris wrote this screenplay, originally titled "Moon of Popping Trees", in 2000. It won the Nicholl Fellowship in Screenwriting in 2002. However, he was unable to sell it, and it languished until his first produced screenplay, El estornino (2021), renewed interest in it. Director Walter Hill changed the title and rewrote it extensively.
- PifiasAt the 1:30:30 mark, when the riders on horseback is splitting up, the first rider to go towards the left has a walkie talkie or mic battery pack clearly visible on his left rear hip. Electronic devices wasn't around during the period portrayed by the movie.
- Citas
Max Borlund: I don't like being lied to and I don't like being used.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Dead for a Dollar?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Dead for a Dollar
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 81.403 US$
- Duración
- 1h 47min(107 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.55 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta