PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,5/10
6 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un grupo de amigos alquila una casa inteligente para pasar un fin de semana de fiesta. Más tarde, empiezan a darse cuenta de que Margaux, el avanzado sistema de inteligencia artificial de la... Leer todoUn grupo de amigos alquila una casa inteligente para pasar un fin de semana de fiesta. Más tarde, empiezan a darse cuenta de que Margaux, el avanzado sistema de inteligencia artificial de la casa, tiene siniestros planes para ellos.Un grupo de amigos alquila una casa inteligente para pasar un fin de semana de fiesta. Más tarde, empiezan a darse cuenta de que Margaux, el avanzado sistema de inteligencia artificial de la casa, tiene siniestros planes para ellos.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 3 nominaciones en total
Reseñas destacadas
A litany of putrefied cinematic sins, sloppily contained in a thin polymer skin:
Lawnmower man eat your heart out (this filmgives instructions).
- Inane story
- Cardboard acting
- Self indulgent slo-mo interstitial sequence
- Infuriating dialogue
- Terrible effects
- Anachronistic technology with no explanation
- Strange scoring choices
- Deranged casting/geriatric 20-somethings
- Technobabble
- Non-existent cast chemistry
- Molecule-thin disposable stereotyped characters
- Redundant plot devices
- Inconsistent character behaviours
- Painfully unrewarding predictability
- Trying sooo hard for that 'R', not deserving it
Lawnmower man eat your heart out (this filmgives instructions).
Wooden cast of young nobodies with typical stereotypical set of boring personalities, the stoner, the jock, the nerd, the nasty girl you know the formula, lame and boring social media people. Don't insult your own intelligence and save precious time of your life that you will not get back. This is total garbage, watching paint dry is more entertaining than Margaux and the sfx are so cheap and nasty a giant curtain used to make the water room look futuristic is just laughable. CGI from the 80's cracked me up think Terminator Liquid Metal guy. Possibly my biggest mistake this decade was to watch part of this.
Not Terrible, but not great either. The concept is interesting and the production is pretty good, some of the effects weren't great but they were passable. The acting for the most part was decent.
This film feels like a dress rehearsal of the movie, it has all the right elements and you get the idea and feel for it but it's just not quite all there.
The kills, again, are respectable but it doesn't quite hit the spot.
It's not amateurish but it's not quite big league. There are a lot of horror movies that are bad, this isn't one of them but again, it's not great. It's not scary but it could've been, it has the all elements but misses the mark. Watch it but don't expect much from it.
This film feels like a dress rehearsal of the movie, it has all the right elements and you get the idea and feel for it but it's just not quite all there.
The kills, again, are respectable but it doesn't quite hit the spot.
It's not amateurish but it's not quite big league. There are a lot of horror movies that are bad, this isn't one of them but again, it's not great. It's not scary but it could've been, it has the all elements but misses the mark. Watch it but don't expect much from it.
Someone saw the episode of 'The Simpsons' where the Ultrahouse 3000, played by Pierce Brosnan, turns evil...and tries to kill everyone.
This is just that, ramped up to 100, in movie form...but ironically, The Simpsons' episode was only 20 minutes long, but it was still way better than this.
This had no real storyline, or character development. Full of clichés. Mediocre acting and TERRIBLE cgi!
It could almost be classed as a comedy. Awful pacing...and a horrible ending.
It did have some awesome kill scenes though!
Really starting to get annoyed with this new 600-character minimum that IMDB has implemented recently.
So even when a film has absolutely nothing worthy of talking about, we still have to stretch a review to fit the limit. Counter-productive in my opinion...as it means that a lot of reviews will be full of gibberish, just to get the numbers up!
This is just that, ramped up to 100, in movie form...but ironically, The Simpsons' episode was only 20 minutes long, but it was still way better than this.
This had no real storyline, or character development. Full of clichés. Mediocre acting and TERRIBLE cgi!
It could almost be classed as a comedy. Awful pacing...and a horrible ending.
It did have some awesome kill scenes though!
Really starting to get annoyed with this new 600-character minimum that IMDB has implemented recently.
So even when a film has absolutely nothing worthy of talking about, we still have to stretch a review to fit the limit. Counter-productive in my opinion...as it means that a lot of reviews will be full of gibberish, just to get the numbers up!
As I had the opportunity to watch the 2022 horror / thriller "Margaux", of course I opted to do so. Sure, I had not even heard about this movie from writers Chris Beyrooty, Chris Sivertson and Nick Waters prior to watching it. But I found the synopsis to be alluring.
And now having watched it, I have to say that this movie was definitely unique. Yeah, there were parts of the storyline and script that had appeal, and the movie was watchable enough for what it turned out to be. But if you step back and look at the things that goes on throughout the movie objectively, then it just makes zero sense and the whole concept is actually not a great thing. But hey, the movie made for a semi-adequate viewing experience, so there was that.
So many things that happened throughout the movie were ludicrous, and why would someone create a house with the ability to kill people, or even have a ceiling that can slide all the way down to the floor? And so many other things just didn't make any logical sense if you think about it.
The acting in the movie was fairly good, taking into consideration the limitations imposed by the script. It was a relatively small cast ensemble, so the actors and actresses had to perform all the more convincingly to carry the movie. And they did that well enough. I was only familiar with actors Richard Harmon and Lochlyn Munro.
Visually then "Margaux" was enjoyable enough. The special effects in the movie were good and helped to distract from the ludicrous concept holes of the storyline.
"Margaux" is the type of movie that you watch once, then shelf it and never return to it a second time.
My rating of director Steven C. Miller's 2022 movie "Margaux" lands on a bland five out of ten stars.
And now having watched it, I have to say that this movie was definitely unique. Yeah, there were parts of the storyline and script that had appeal, and the movie was watchable enough for what it turned out to be. But if you step back and look at the things that goes on throughout the movie objectively, then it just makes zero sense and the whole concept is actually not a great thing. But hey, the movie made for a semi-adequate viewing experience, so there was that.
So many things that happened throughout the movie were ludicrous, and why would someone create a house with the ability to kill people, or even have a ceiling that can slide all the way down to the floor? And so many other things just didn't make any logical sense if you think about it.
The acting in the movie was fairly good, taking into consideration the limitations imposed by the script. It was a relatively small cast ensemble, so the actors and actresses had to perform all the more convincingly to carry the movie. And they did that well enough. I was only familiar with actors Richard Harmon and Lochlyn Munro.
Visually then "Margaux" was enjoyable enough. The special effects in the movie were good and helped to distract from the ludicrous concept holes of the storyline.
"Margaux" is the type of movie that you watch once, then shelf it and never return to it a second time.
My rating of director Steven C. Miller's 2022 movie "Margaux" lands on a bland five out of ten stars.
¿Sabías que...?
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Margaux?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- 驚魂派對
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 44 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta