Rebel Moon (Parte uno): La niña del fuego
Título original: Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
Una joven busca guerreros de otros planetas para luchar contra los ejércitos tiránicos que aterrorizan a su pacífica colonia.Una joven busca guerreros de otros planetas para luchar contra los ejércitos tiránicos que aterrorizan a su pacífica colonia.Una joven busca guerreros de otros planetas para luchar contra los ejércitos tiránicos que aterrorizan a su pacífica colonia.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 2 premios y 4 nominaciones en total
Reseñas destacadas
What's worse than a movie that shamelessly plagiarizes elements from other sci-fi or fantasy products? A movie that does all this and fails to even build a world in which you feel interest and curiosity in finding out how the story will evolve. However, if the terrible world-building is Rebel Moon's biggest flaw, it certainly cannot be said that everything else is able to compensate for the extremely poor script. Direction, visual effects, photography, costumes are all so aseptic and unmemorable that it is guaranteed that nothing of this movie will remain forged in people's minds for years to come, as movies and TV series have been able to do like which Rebel Moon would pretentiously love to place itself.
Hello,
Like evreyone who reads this (sorry i'm french and yes I hated Raygun), finally we have Zach Snyder. I saw his first cut and was unimpressed (hated the first version, too disney like for me).
But, his director's cut, the decription and details of the characters has finally caught up to me. I mean, we did not have any ulteriors or superiors motives for any characters and it was a pain in the neck. But with the director's cut, finally we can relate. Regarding the "violent" scene, finally we left Disney and went for a more "gore" approach (everyone has its limit). Personnaly, it wasn't gore enough knowing Snyder past work. However, the character evolution was spot on. Basically, watch the director's cut, it is so much better than the original one.
Like evreyone who reads this (sorry i'm french and yes I hated Raygun), finally we have Zach Snyder. I saw his first cut and was unimpressed (hated the first version, too disney like for me).
But, his director's cut, the decription and details of the characters has finally caught up to me. I mean, we did not have any ulteriors or superiors motives for any characters and it was a pain in the neck. But with the director's cut, finally we can relate. Regarding the "violent" scene, finally we left Disney and went for a more "gore" approach (everyone has its limit). Personnaly, it wasn't gore enough knowing Snyder past work. However, the character evolution was spot on. Basically, watch the director's cut, it is so much better than the original one.
It is all over the place. No character connection. Vulgar scenes to force emotions. Weird cheap cocktail of Star Wars and Dune. Felt like fan-made university project with a multi-million budget that was only spend on slow motion CGI scenes. I doubt that the extended edition will have more movie magic since this one already fails in every sense.
Not even the world-building or the design felt worth watching since it felt like the characters were in costumes rather than authentic dresses. No scene composition gave the feeling of a profound world with deep history.
Too many unoriginal ideas that were thrown together with the hope of "Let's hope it will be the next movie success".
I wouldn't say that the actors were weak, rather the error or lack of writers in the writing process of the movie show how important dialogue, character building arcs and real emotional value are in movies rather than gross tasteless blood baths, torture, explosions and one-dimensional characters.
Not even the world-building or the design felt worth watching since it felt like the characters were in costumes rather than authentic dresses. No scene composition gave the feeling of a profound world with deep history.
Too many unoriginal ideas that were thrown together with the hope of "Let's hope it will be the next movie success".
I wouldn't say that the actors were weak, rather the error or lack of writers in the writing process of the movie show how important dialogue, character building arcs and real emotional value are in movies rather than gross tasteless blood baths, torture, explosions and one-dimensional characters.
A test of the degree of imagination shown in a sci-fi film is whether it could equally have been done as a cowboy movie. "Rebel Moon Pt. 1" could have, and the movie would have been "The Magnificent Seven" (1960, 2016, 1998-2000 as a TV series, or indeed "Seven Samurai" of 1954), because the plot is err.... identical. And I expect the plot of the second half will be identical too. So if you have ever seen any of those and a spaceship taking off, you don't need to see this movie (OK, some of the spaceship imagery is very good). But I have to wonder whether anyone was actually paid for "writing" the script :-)
I wanted this to be good so badly. Like really badly.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesZack Snyder first conceived this as a Star Wars movie, and pitched it to Lucasfilm shortly after it was bought by Disney in 2012, but it never got off the ground.
- PifiasThe shape of the floating platform on Gondival [at 1:52:00] changes depending on where it is viewed from. When Noble lands on it, and later Kora (and all shots from above, and of their fight) it is octagonal, or eight-sided - i.e. five edges are often in the shot, two of which are parallel; but in all the shots from underneath (as when Kora falls over the edge) it is shown as hexagonal, or six-sided; however it cannot be both.
- Versiones alternativasOn August 2nd, 2024, Netflix released an R-rated director's cut of the film, titled Rebel Moon - Part One: Chalice of Blood. This version runs for 205 minutes (3h 25m) and features more violence, language and sexuality which were removed from A Child of Fire.
- Banda sonoraThunderous
Written and Performed by Diego Stocco
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Rebel Moon (Capítulo uno): El cáliz de sangre
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 90.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración
- 2h 13min(133 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta