Dashcam

The movie is max 1 hr 19 mins and the first 20 mins is unbearable; consisting of literal human feces, obnoxious and constant singing, not to mention a super unlikable main character. Instead of being horror, the movie tries to make you squirm from needles, etc, and did I mention feces. Waste of time. Don't bother. Super obnoxious movie. I can't imagine how anyone greenlit this to go into production.

While Rob Savage managed to deliver a spooky zoom horror film with Host - his second feature unfortunately does not deliver as much.

A big part of that is the fact that the protagonist is utterly horrible to watch. Considering the fact that the actress is not so different to the character she plays, it's not really fun watching her on screen. If the film had been able to elevate this through a great and engaging script, it might have saved this film, but sadly it didn't - so it doesn't.

Is Annie Hardy like her character in the movie? If so, dearie me. One of the most repulsive characters i've witnessed, Dashcam is woeful and has no redeeming features whatsoever. Avoid at all costs.

Annie Hardy is fed up of the COVID restrictions in The States, so she travels to spend time with her old college friend, Stretch. After falling out with Stretch, Annie pinches Stretch's car, and picks up a sick woman named Angela.

This was like stepping back in time about twenty years or so, when all manner of Blair Witch rip offs came out, it almost gave me a sense of nostalgia.

The film itself, may have been better if Annie had been done away with my Angela as soon as she stepped into the car, a shame all she did was mess herself.

The aforementioned mess is the exact word I'd use for this film, it's shockingly bad, I can see they'd aimed for a sort of comedy horror, but it just failed, largely because Annie was such an obnoxious idiot, hopefully she's a lot calmer in real life.

I just renewed my Sky subscription, and this was the first movie I watched, heaven help us.

Too irritating for words.

3/10.

For those who are unaware, I adore found footage features and there are mainly two reasons behind my fondness for this sub-genre. For one, with its shaky, grainy footage; the whole set-up kind of gives you an unadulterated, authentic feel, a touch of realism that you typically are deprived of in the case of a conventional film. And two, with its POV perspective, these films effortlessly make you a part of their experience, they make you feel like you are in it, partaking like the actors on-screen.

Now, the only downside is that each one of those aforementioned characteristics can only shine to its brightest when they are properly supervised and under a controlled environment. There are certain limitations, and specific boundaries, as a filmmaker, needs to abide by. If somebody crosses that limit, the whole set-up could collapse at any given moment. And I'm afraid, that's exactly what happened in this case.

Too much grain and too much shake spoiled my scope for any enjoyment. Despite some intriguing ideas and a handful of shocks and surprises; Half the time, I found myself squinting my eyes hard to try to make some sense of what was happening. Believe me, I have seen plenty of found footage in my life, but none of them got on my nerves as this one did. The unsophisticatedness of the imageries just put me off and took me out of the experience.

And to add to my misery, there was barely any context, any backstory given for the supernatural things that takes place. As for the characters, one of the wackiest, unlikable sets of personalities I have ever withstood in a movie. I don't care if that was deliberate or not, I just couldn't care less for any of these individuals and that's a shame.