The Territory

The Territory is visually striking, with polished cinematography and high production value, yet it ultimately feels like a soulless spectacle. It relies on familiar Western tropes; beauty shots, expert interviews, aestheticized destruction, and pushy sound design that dictates emotion. Even with Indigenous camera participation, most of the film, around 70%, still reflects an outsider gaze.

The narrative feels fragmented, as if the filmmaker parachutes in for beautiful shots rather than building a complete, lived in story.

The film ends abruptly, as if unsure of its direction, leaving me feeling abandoned as a viewer. I wanted to truly know the Indigenous people, but the film only skims the surface, never letting us into their lives beyond brief fragments.

Perfectly packaged for Western funders, festivals, and their echo chamber of validation, the film checks every expected box; Indigenous struggle, climate change, Amazon deforestation, while fitting neatly into a digestible format.

A more meaningful approach would involve deeper research and longer immersion, creating a film that reflects the community's ways of seeing and relating to their land. This does not mean handing authorship to untrained individuals; it means using cinematic craft to express a worldview rather than bending that worldview into a pre existing festival friendly arc.

Honeyland demonstrates this alternative. With a fraction of the budget, it achieves intimacy and cultural authenticity without interviews, explanatory devices, or spectacle. It invites viewers to inhabit its characters' rhythms rather than observe them from afar.

The filmmakers clearly have noble intentions and technical skill, yet the result feels designed to satisfy the Western gaze, a polished product made for festivals and funders, validated by the same systems that continue to gatekeep Indigenous storytellers. For all its urgency, it reinforces the very power structures that reward impact driven statement films while sidelining authentic Indigenous voices.

Originally premiered at the 2022 Sundance Film Festival and is the World Cinema Documentary Competition selection. I originally got tickets for this screening back at the festival but I got to busy at the end of the day to watch this so I skipped it. After finding another festival that had this online, I gave it a second shot.

This is a documentary about a land dispute between Brazilian farmers and the indigenous community. Where the farmers are trying to seize a protected area of the Amazon rainforest. There, a young Indigenous leader and his mentor must fight back in defense of the land and an uncontacted group living deep within the forest. It is very well shot throughout of the documentary and because of the presentation, it really felt more like a cinematic experience then an actual documentary. Some of the best points are that they got to listen both sides without being one sided and allowing interesting conversations to be in play. There are some really terrifying and frustrating moments that helped to make the realism of the situation feel relevant and consistent.

Some problems are the pacing as it did drag a little at times in the second act.

The documentary is 80 something minutes long but it did feel a little more then 80s minutes at times. The musical soundtrack does feels a little cheesy at times but it didn't ruin the whole experience for me. Besides these small gripes, it's a pretty good documentary about the deforestation and problems in the Brazilian world and it's a must watch at least once in a lifetime.

Rating: B.

About a small tribe protecting their land against invaders. They filmed for years as the political climate changed in Brazil, and the COVID changed the trajectory of their fight. You can see pictures or read about the distraction of the Amazon, but nothing compares to a documentary to give you the full picture. Incredible and moving work from everyone involved. Captures some crazy moments and young people who step up in a time of need. Reminiscent of the American west and manifest destiny, but this time the indigenous are fighting back with more than bows and arrows. They have drones and social media show the world what is happing to theirs.

The Territory has a good heart, and one can see why foundations and festivals fall for it. Indigenous rights, deforestation, climate change, the producers pulling in (one set of - the agreed-upon, correct set of) subjects as collaborators (to hell with the others). Boxes get checked, an echo chamber is built. What is lost in all that is the need to tell a cohesive, engaging narrative with simply understood facts. Confusion reigns, except that the bad guys are horrible people and the good guys are saints.

So much untold effort and resources go into making a documentary, and watching this it's hard not to appreciate that. But how about we support actual great filmmaking, not feeding poorly conceived righteous indignation. Good starting point for making the argument: "Darwin's Nightmare" and "Honeyland," two masterful documentaries interweaving environmentalism and story.